Model Answer
0 min readIntroduction
Political Science, traditionally focused on normative questions and institutional descriptions, underwent a significant transformation in the 20th century with the emergence of the behavioural approach. This shift, largely post-World War II, stemmed from a dissatisfaction with the descriptive and speculative nature of traditional political thought. The behavioural revolution, as it’s often called, sought to make the study of politics more scientific by focusing on observable and measurable political behaviour. It aimed to move beyond ‘what ought to be’ to ‘what is’, employing empirical methods borrowed from the social sciences like psychology, sociology, and statistics.
The Rise of Behaviouralism: A Reaction to Traditionalism
Prior to the behavioural approach, Political Science was dominated by institutionalism and legalism. Scholars focused on the formal structures of government – constitutions, laws, and institutions – and often engaged in normative analysis, prescribing how political systems *should* function. This approach was criticized for being ahistorical, lacking empirical rigor, and failing to explain actual political phenomena. The limitations of traditional approaches became particularly apparent in the context of the rise of totalitarian regimes and the complexities of modern political systems.
Key Features of the Behavioural Approach
- Empirical Focus: Behaviouralists emphasized the study of observable political behaviour – individual and group actions – rather than abstract political ideas.
- Methodological Rigor: The approach advocated for the use of scientific methods, including quantitative techniques like statistical analysis, surveys, and experiments.
- Value-Free Research: Behaviouralists aimed for objectivity and sought to minimize the influence of personal values and biases in their research.
- Interdisciplinary Approach: The behavioural approach drew heavily from other social sciences, particularly psychology, sociology, and economics, to understand political behaviour.
- Generalization and Theory Building: The goal was to develop generalizable theories about political behaviour that could be applied across different contexts.
Prominent Behaviouralists and their Contributions
Several scholars played a pivotal role in the development of the behavioural approach. Robert Dahl, in his work “The Modern Political System” (1967), applied behavioural techniques to the study of power and decision-making in New Haven. David Easton, with his “Systems Analysis”, proposed a model of political systems as input-output systems, focusing on the processes of political socialization, decision-making, and policy implementation. Gabriel Almond contributed significantly to comparative politics through his work on political culture and political socialization. Harold Lasswell, known for his work on propaganda and political communication, emphasized the psychological aspects of political behaviour.
Methods Employed by Behaviouralists
- Survey Research: Large-scale surveys were used to gather data on public opinion, voting behaviour, and political attitudes.
- Statistical Analysis: Quantitative data was analyzed using statistical techniques to identify patterns and relationships.
- Content Analysis: The systematic analysis of political texts, speeches, and media content was used to understand political communication and ideology.
- Case Studies: In-depth studies of specific political events or phenomena were conducted to provide detailed insights.
- Experiments: Controlled experiments were used to test hypotheses about political behaviour.
Criticisms of the Behavioural Approach
Despite its contributions, the behavioural approach faced several criticisms:
- Overemphasis on Method: Critics argued that behaviouralists became overly focused on methodology at the expense of substantive political questions.
- Neglect of Normative Concerns: The emphasis on value-free research was seen as neglecting the ethical and normative dimensions of politics.
- Limited Scope: The focus on observable behaviour was criticized for ignoring the role of ideas, values, and institutions in shaping political outcomes.
- Difficulty in Generalization: The complexity of political phenomena made it difficult to develop generalizable theories.
- Ecological Fallacy: Drawing inferences about individuals based on aggregate data was a common pitfall.
The Post-Behavioural Era
By the 1970s, the behavioural approach began to decline in prominence, giving way to post-behaviouralism. Post-behaviouralists, while acknowledging the value of behavioural methods, argued for a more integrated approach that combined empirical analysis with normative considerations and a focus on social relevance. Scholars like David Held advocated for a ‘critical’ approach to political science, emphasizing the importance of understanding power relations and social inequalities.
Conclusion
The behavioural approach fundamentally reshaped the study of Political Science, introducing scientific rigor and empirical methods. While it faced legitimate criticisms regarding its limitations and potential biases, its legacy remains significant. It laid the groundwork for modern political science research and continues to influence the field today. The shift towards post-behaviouralism demonstrates a continuing evolution in the discipline, seeking to balance methodological sophistication with a commitment to addressing pressing political and social challenges.
Answer Length
This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.