UPSC MainsGENERAL-STUDIES-PAPER-II202515 Marks250 Words
हिंदी में पढ़ें
Q16.

Inequality in the ownership pattern of resources is one of the major causes of poverty. Discuss in the context of 'paradox of poverty'.

How to Approach

The answer should begin by defining the 'paradox of poverty' and establishing the direct link between unequal resource ownership and poverty. The body will delve into various forms of resource inequality (land, capital, human, natural resources) and explain how each perpetuates poverty, illustrating with Indian examples. It should also incorporate recent statistics and government initiatives to address these disparities. The conclusion will summarize the arguments and offer a way forward with policy recommendations.

Model Answer

0 min read

Introduction

The 'paradox of poverty' refers to the perplexing phenomenon where poverty persists and often deepens despite a nation's substantial economic growth and abundant resources. India, a rapidly growing economy with vast human and natural wealth, exemplifies this paradox, where millions remain in deprivation amidst increasing prosperity. At the core of this paradox lies the profound inequality in the ownership and control of resources. When a small segment of the population disproportionately controls essential assets like land, capital, and access to opportunities, it creates structural barriers that prevent the benefits of economic development from reaching the majority, thereby perpetuating a cycle of poverty.

Understanding the Paradox of Poverty and Resource Inequality

The paradox of poverty highlights that poverty is not merely a consequence of resource scarcity, but often a result of their skewed distribution and access. In a country like India, despite significant progress in poverty reduction (multidimensional poverty reduced from 55.1% to 16.4% between 2005-2021), the widening gap in resource ownership continues to exacerbate this paradox.

How Inequality in Resource Ownership Causes Poverty

Unequal ownership patterns create systemic disadvantages that trap individuals and communities in poverty. This manifests across various types of resources:
  • Land and Agricultural Inequality: In a predominantly agrarian society, land is a primary productive asset and a source of livelihood.
    • Concentration: A small rural elite often owns the majority of fertile land, while a large population remains landless or possesses fragmented, unviable plots. This limits agricultural livelihoods and the ability to use land as collateral for loans, restricting investment and perpetuating poverty.
    • Historical Injustices: Legacies like the Zamindari system and caste-based exclusion have historically prevented marginalized communities from owning land, leading to intergenerational poverty. While land reforms were initiated, their implementation has been uneven.
  • Capital and Financial Assets: Access to capital is crucial for entrepreneurship, investment, and economic mobility.
    • Exclusion: Poor households often lack access to formal credit and financial services, forcing them to rely on informal, high-interest loans. This hinders their ability to start businesses, invest in education, or cope with economic shocks.
    • Wealth Concentration: The concentration of financial wealth means that the rich can accumulate more through investments, while the poor are denied similar opportunities.
  • Natural Resources (Minerals, Forests, Water): Regions rich in natural resources often exhibit the highest levels of poverty.
    • Resource Curse: Local populations, particularly tribal communities, are frequently displaced from their ancestral lands and forests due to mining or infrastructure projects without adequate compensation or rehabilitation. The wealth generated often benefits private corporations and external entities, leaving local communities impoverished and disempowered.
    • Environmental Degradation: Exploitation of natural resources can lead to environmental degradation, further impacting the livelihoods of those dependent on these resources.
  • Human Capital and Social Resources: This includes access to quality education, healthcare, and skill development.
    • Unequal Access: Affluent families can afford premier education and healthcare, ensuring better opportunities and capabilities for their children. The poor, reliant on underfunded public systems, face capability deprivation, limiting their employability and future earnings.
    • Digital Divide: Unequal access to digital infrastructure and technology further widens the gap in opportunities, especially in an increasingly digital economy.
  • Social and Institutional Inequality:
    • Caste and Gender Bias: Social hierarchies and discrimination based on caste and gender continue to restrict access to resources, education, and employment opportunities for marginalized groups. For instance, women's land ownership remains low, limiting their economic agency.
    • Elite Capture: Political influence often allows vested interests to shape policies that favor them, undermining the effectiveness of welfare schemes intended for the poor.

Government Initiatives and Their Impact

The Indian government has implemented several measures to address resource inequality and poverty:

Land Reforms: Abolition of intermediaries (Zamindari system), tenancy reforms, and land ceiling acts aimed at redistributing land and securing tenure for cultivators. While early reforms showed positive impacts on income growth and capital accumulation, their effectiveness has declined over time due to implementation challenges.

Financial Inclusion: Schemes like the Pradhan Mantri Jan Dhan Yojana (PMJDY) aim to provide banking services to the unbanked, while Pradhan Mantri MUDRA Yojana (PMMY) facilitates collateral-free loans for micro-enterprises.

Skill Development: Programs like Pradhan Mantri Kaushal Vikas Yojana (PMKVY) seek to enhance employability, especially for marginalized youth.

Social Safety Nets: Schemes like the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) provide a legal guarantee for 100 days of wage employment, while the National Social Assistance Programme (NSAP) offers social security benefits.

Property Rights: The SVAMITVA Scheme provides property cards to rural households, aiming to formalize land ownership and facilitate access to credit.

Conclusion

The paradox of poverty in resource-rich nations like India is intrinsically linked to the unequal ownership patterns of critical resources. While economic growth is essential, its benefits often fail to 'trickle down' due to structural inequalities in land, capital, natural, and human resources. Addressing this requires not just growth-centric policies, but also robust redistributive measures, effective implementation of land reforms, inclusive financial strategies, equitable access to quality education and healthcare, and strengthening property rights for the vulnerable. Ultimately, combating poverty necessitates a holistic approach that ensures equitable access to resources, fostering inclusive growth and preventing wealth concentration from perpetuating deprivation.

Answer Length

This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.

Additional Resources

Key Definitions

Paradox of Poverty
The phenomenon where poverty persists and can even worsen within a country or region that possesses abundant natural resources and/or experiences significant economic growth. It highlights that poverty is often a structural issue related to unequal distribution and access to resources, rather than a lack of resources itself.
Resource Curse
The paradox that countries or regions with an abundance of natural resources tend to have less economic growth, democracy, and worse development outcomes than countries with fewer natural resources. This is often due to mismanagement, corruption, conflict over resources, and the neglect of other economic sectors, leading to poverty among local populations.

Key Statistics

According to the World Inequality Database (2022-23), the top 1% of the Indian population controlled 22.6% of the national income and 40.1% of the nation's wealth, marking historically unprecedented levels of wealth concentration.

Source: World Inequality Database, 2022-23

The Oxfam report "Survival of the Richest: The India Story" highlights that India's richest 1% own more than 40% of the country's total wealth, while the bottom 50% hold just 3%.

Source: Oxfam International, "Survival of the Richest: The India Story" report

Examples

Land Inequality in Rural India

In rural India, the top 10% of farmers own approximately 60% of the cultivable land, while the bottom 50% own merely 2.3%. This severe land concentration limits the productivity and income potential for a vast number of small and marginal farmers, trapping them in poverty despite the agricultural potential of the nation.

Mineral-rich states and Poverty

States like Jharkhand, Chhattisgarh, and Odisha are rich in mineral resources such as coal and iron ore. Despite significant mining activities and the wealth generated, these states continue to have high poverty rates, particularly among tribal communities who often face displacement and loss of livelihood without adequate compensation, exemplifying the 'resource curse'.

Frequently Asked Questions

What role do historical factors play in current resource inequality in India?

Historical factors such as the colonial legacy and the Zamindari system led to highly skewed land ownership patterns. Post-independence land reforms aimed to correct this but faced implementation challenges. Additionally, traditional social hierarchies like the caste system historically restricted access to resources, perpetuating disadvantages across generations.

Topics Covered

Social JusticeIndian EconomyResource OwnershipInequalityPovertyParadox of Poverty