UPSC MainsGeneral Studies Paper IConstitutionPractice question

Realisation of Part IV Constitutional Objectives

To what extent justice has been brought to the goals and objectives of Part-IV of the Constitution?

To what extent~250 words2 min readmedium
Attempt it first, timed · optional

Write the answer on paper, as in the exam. Start the timer, keep to the word target.

00:00/ 11 min · 250 words

Done writing? Photograph the sheet and see how it scores against this model answer, with feedback on what to fix.

Upload your answer sheet

How to approach

Introduce Part IV of the Constitution (Directive Principles of State Policy) and its core objective of securing socio-economic justice. Evaluate key successes across socio-economic, legal, and democratic spheres using constitutional articles and data, followed by persistent gaps and challenges. Conclude by highlighting the synthesis of fundamental rights and directive principles in establishing a welfare state.

Model answer

310 words

Introduction

Part IV of the Constitution (Articles 36 to 51) enshrines the Directive Principles of State Policy (DPSPs), laying down the blueprint for a social and economic democracy. Although explicitly declared non-justiciable under Article 37, these principles are fundamental in the governance of the country, guiding the state toward establishing an egalitarian welfare state.

Successes in Delivering Justice

  • Socio-Economic Justice (Articles 39 & 47): Agrarian land reforms dismantled feudal systems, while welfare legislations such as the National Food Security Act (NFSA) operationalised Article 47. Notably, NITI Aayog (2023) estimates that approximately 24.8 crore Indians exited multidimensional poverty over a nine-year period.
  • Legal and Gender Equity (Articles 39A & 42): The Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 established NALSA to ensure justice is not denied due to economic barriers, providing free legal aid to over 44 lakh beneficiaries between 2022 and 2025. Additionally, the Maternity Benefit Act and the Equal Remuneration Act have advanced workplace gender justice.
  • Democratic Decentralisation (Article 40): The 73rd and 74th Constitutional Amendment Acts institutionalised local self-governance across rural and urban local bodies, realizing the Gandhian vision of village swaraj.

Persistent Gaps and Limitations

  • Economic Disparity (Article 39(c)): Despite the constitutional mandate to prevent the concentration of wealth and means of production to the common detriment, wealth and income inequalities remain elevated.
  • Informal Sector Vulnerabilities (Article 43): A substantial portion of the unorganised workforce still lacks access to a guaranteed living wage, formal contracts, and comprehensive social security nets.
  • Socio-Cultural Dilemmas (Article 44): The mandate to secure a Uniform Civil Code (UCC) remains largely unfulfilled at the national level due to diverse socio-cultural and political sensitivities.

Conclusion

While resource constraints and state capacity have historically limited complete fulfillment, legislative enactments and judicial interpretation have increasingly elevated several directive principles into enforceable rights—such as early childhood care transforming into the Right to Education under Article 21A—advancing India toward comprehensive socio-economic justice.

Key facts to remember

definition
Directive Principles of State Policy (DPSPs)

Non-justiciable guidelines contained in Part IV (Articles 36-51) of the Indian Constitution that direct the state to secure a social order for the promotion of the welfare of the people.

statistic

According to NITI Aayog, an estimated 24.8 crore Indians escaped multidimensional poverty over a period of nine years.

NITI Aayog (2023)
statistic

Over 44 lakh beneficiaries received free legal aid through the National Legal Services Authority (NALSA) between 2022 and 2025.

NALSA

Frequently asked questions

Why are DPSPs non-justiciable under Article 37?

The framers of the Constitution recognized that newly independent India lacked the financial and institutional capacity to make socio-economic rights immediately enforceable by courts, entrusting their implementation to state policy and legislative action over time.