UPSC MainsGeneral Studies Paper IEthicsPractice question

Determinants of Ethical Behaviour in Individuals

What are the significant determinants of ethical behaviour? Do these determinants promote or hinder ethical behaviour in individuals? Explain with examples.

Explain~250 words3 min readmedium
Attempt it first, timed · optional

Write the answer on paper, as in the exam. Start the timer, keep to the word target.

00:00/ 11 min · 250 words

Done writing? Photograph the sheet and see how it scores against this model answer, with feedback on what to fix.

Upload your answer sheet

How to approach

Begin by defining ethical behaviour and introducing the key internal and external determinants. Analyze how each determinant functions as a double-edged sword—both promoting and hindering moral conduct—substantiating with historical, social, and legal examples. Conclude by emphasizing the necessity of individual conscience and constitutional morality in transcending cultural biases.

Model answer

443 words

Introduction

Ethical behaviour refers to human conduct that conforms to established principles of right and wrong, justice, and fairness. It is shaped by a confluence of internal forces (conscience, individual moral reasoning) and external institutions (family, religion, peer groups, legal frameworks). These determinants do not act monolithically; rather, they serve as a double-edged sword, capable of either elevating moral conduct or rationalising misconduct.

Significant Determinants and Their Dual Influence

Human behaviour is influenced by primary socialising agents, institutional frameworks, and cognitive mechanisms. Each determinant exerts both positive and negative pressures on individual morality.

1. Family and Primary Socialisation

  • How it promotes ethical behaviour: The family instils foundational virtues such as empathy, truthfulness, and altruism during formative childhood. For example, Mahatma Gandhi attributed his lifelong adherence to non-violence and truth largely to the devout character and moral discipline of his mother, Putlibai.
  • How it hinders ethical behaviour: Families can transmit intergenerational parochial prejudices, reinforcing patriarchy, caste endogamy, and justification of dowry demands under the guise of custom and family prestige.

2. Religion and Cultural Traditions

  • How it promotes ethical behaviour: Faith systems provide codified frameworks of duty, benevolence, and compassion. For instance, the Buddhist principle of Karuna (compassion), the Sikh institution of Seva (selfless service), and Ashoka's Rock Edict XII promoting mutual religious tolerance and harmony foster active social morality.
  • How it hinders ethical behaviour: Religious dogmatism and scriptural misinterpretation historically sanctioned social evils such as Sati, untouchability, honour killings, and sectarian violence, subordinating universal human dignity to dogma.

3. Law and State Apparatus

  • How it promotes ethical behaviour: Legal structures establish a baseline of accountability through codified constitutional morality. For example, Articles 14, 15, and 17 of the Indian Constitution legally prohibit discrimination and untouchability, transforming social consciousness toward equality.
  • How it hinders ethical behaviour: An unjust legal framework can compel or normalise gross human rights violations. Historical examples include the Nuremberg Laws in Nazi Germany and the Apartheid legislation in South Africa, where state laws legally compelled citizens to enact discriminatory and inhumane policies.

4. Conscience versus Peer Pressure

  • How it promotes ethical behaviour: An awakened conscience enables individuals to challenge social orthodoxy and resist wrongful majoritarian norms. For example, Raja Ram Mohan Roy defied orthodoxy to advocate for women's rights and the abolition of Sati.
  • How it hinders ethical behaviour: Peer pressure, herd mentality, and institutional groupthink often silence moral doubts, leading individuals to normalise systemic corruption, ragging in universities, or bureaucratic indifference.

Conclusion

Determinants reflect the ambient norms of a given era and society, meaning external structures alone cannot guarantee righteous action. Sustaining genuine ethical behaviour demands continuous moral reasoning, critical education, and alignment with constitutional morality to transcend prevailing societal biases.

Key facts to remember

definition
Determinants of Ethics

The internal factors (conscience, values, beliefs) and external institutions (family, education, religion, law, society) that influence, prescribe, and shape human moral decisions.

example
Ashoka's Rock Edict XII

King Ashoka inscribed Rock Edict XII to promote religious toleration and mutual respect among different sects, illustrating religion and governance as positive drivers of public morality.

example
Nuremberg Laws (1935)

Nazi legislation institutionalised racial discrimination and persecution, illustrating how an unjust legal system can actively hinder moral behaviour by codifying human rights abuses.

Frequently asked questions

Can law alone ensure ethical behaviour in society?

No. While law establishes external deterrence and minimum behavioural standards, it cannot regulate inner motives or conscience. Genuine ethical behaviour requires internalised values and moral reasoning.