UPSC MainsGeneral Studies Paper IIndian PolityPractice question

Decline in Health of Parliamentary Functioning in India

The decline in the health of Parliamentary functioning, weakening its role as a key pillar of democracy. Discuss and analyse.

DiscussAnalyse~250 words2 min readmedium
Attempt it first, timed · optional

Write the answer on paper, as in the exam. Start the timer, keep to the word target.

00:00/ 11 min · 250 words

Done writing? Photograph the sheet and see how it scores against this model answer, with feedback on what to fix.

Upload your answer sheet

How to approach

Introduce Parliament's constitutional role under Article 79 as the supreme deliberative body and anchor of representative democracy. Examine the key indicators and structural causes behind the decline in legislative scrutiny and debate, using relevant data. Conclude with constructive institutional reforms recommended by committees like the NCRWC to restore legislative vitality.

Model answer

300 words

Introduction

Parliament is the institutional anchor of India's representative democracy under Article 79 of the Constitution. However, structural shifts and procedural decay have significantly undermined its deliberative health. The 17th Lok Sabha recorded only 274 sittings—the lowest-ever for a full five-year term—highlighting the growing decline in legislative engagement and institutional accountability.

Indicators and Causes of Parliamentary Decline

  • Bypassing Legislative Scrutiny: According to PRS Legislative Research, only 16% of bills in the 17th Lok Sabha were referred to Parliamentary Standing Committees for detailed examination, marking a steep fall from 71% in the 15th Lok Sabha. Furthermore, over 35% of bills were passed with under an hour of debate, severely eroding institutional checks and balances over executive action.
  • Disruption as an Opposition Tactic: Routine disruptions, continuous sloganeering, and tactical adjournments have increasingly replaced substantive debate. Frequent stalling of the Question Hour dismantles a primary mechanism of executive accountability, accompanied by unprecedented mass suspensions of over 200 Members of Parliament in the 17th Lok Sabha.
  • Erosion of Individual Agency via Anti-Defection: The Tenth Schedule (Anti-Defection Law) mandates strict compliance with party whips on all legislative matters. This stifles intra-party dissent and independence, effectively reducing legislators to voting blocs unable to articulate distinct constituency-level concerns.
  • Institutional Partisanship and Dilution of Norms: The prolonged vacancy in the office of the Deputy Speaker throughout the 17th Lok Sabha undermined the spirit of Article 93 and bipartisan traditions. Additionally, the frequent recourse to the 'guillotine' to pass budgetary demands without adequate discussion deprives public finances of parliamentary oversight.

Conclusion

A weakened legislature risks degenerating into an executive-driven body and inviting unnecessary judicial overreach. Restoring parliamentary vitality requires institutionalising a statutory minimum of 100 sitting days annually as recommended by the NCRWC, making committee referrals compulsory for substantial legislation, and limiting the anti-defection whip strictly to confidence and money motions.

Key facts to remember

statistic

Only 16% of bills introduced during the 17th Lok Sabha were referred to Parliamentary Standing Committees, compared to 71% in the 15th Lok Sabha and 27% in the 16th Lok Sabha.

PRS Legislative Research
statistic

The 17th Lok Sabha sat for only 274 days across its five-year tenure, recording the lowest number of sitting days for any full-term Lok Sabha since independence.

PRS Legislative Research
definition
Guillotine in Parliament

A procedural device used during the passage of the budget where undiscussed demands for grants are grouped together and put to vote without further debate when the allotted time expires.

Frequently asked questions

What did the NCRWC recommend to improve parliamentary sittings?

The National Commission to Review the Working of the Constitution (NCRWC) recommended a mandatory minimum threshold of 100 sittings per year for the Lok Sabha and 90 sittings for the Rajya Sabha to restore adequate legislative scrutiny.