UPSC MainsGeneral Studies Paper IInternational RelationsPractice question

Collateral Impact of Great Power Rivalries

"When two elephants fight, it is the grass that gets trampled." Discuss with reference to contemporary global geopolitics, economic conflicts, and environmental challenges.

Discuss~250 words3 min readmedium
Attempt it first, timed · optional

Write the answer on paper, as in the exam. Start the timer, keep to the word target.

00:00/ 11 min · 250 words

Done writing? Photograph the sheet and see how it scores against this model answer, with feedback on what to fix.

Upload your answer sheet

How to approach

Begin by contextualising the African proverb, explaining how major power contestations inflict disproportionate collateral damage on smaller and developing nations. Elaborate on the three dimensions specified in the prompt: geopolitical shocks, economic disruptions, and environmental inequities, supported by concrete global examples. Conclude with a forward-looking perspective on reformed multilateralism, South-South solidarity, and strategic autonomy.

Model answer

459 words

Introduction

The ancient African proverb 'when two elephants fight, it is the grass that gets trampled' highlights how great-power collisions generate severe, asymmetric collateral damage for vulnerable states, societies, and ecosystems that lack agency in the dispute. In an increasingly multipolar yet polarized international order, systemic rivalries among hegemons impose heavy externalities on the Global South across political, economic, and ecological dimensions.

Geopolitical Shocks and Regional Destabilisation

Major power rivalries directly imperil the sovereignty, food security, and diplomatic autonomy of developing nations across multiple theatres:

  • Food and Fertilizer Crises: The Russia-NATO confrontation over Ukraine severely impeded Black Sea agricultural exports, triggering acute wheat and fertilizer shortages and worsening famine across the Horn of Africa.
  • Polarisation of Regional Frameworks: Intensified US-China competition in the Indo-Pacific threatens the long-standing consensus on ASEAN centrality, putting immense diplomatic and military pressure on Southeast Asian and Pacific Island nations to abandon non-alignment and take sides in competing security architectures.
  • Proxy Conflicts: Competing spheres of influence among regional and global powers in West Asia and Africa have prolonged internal unrest and displacement in nations like Sudan, Yemen, and Syria.

Economic Conflicts and Weaponised Interdependence

Geoeconomic fragmentation and trade friction between global superpowers have weakened developing economies reliant on stable markets and open trade:

  • Supply Chain Fragmentation: US-China tariff escalations, tech export controls, and industrial protectionism fragment critical semiconductor, mineral, and technological supply chains, imposing elevated transition costs on emerging markets.
  • Monetary Shocks and Debt Distress: Unilateral sanctions regimes, trade blockades, and synchronized interest rate hikes driven by advanced economies have imported inflation and dried up external credit, accelerating sovereign debt defaults in economies like Sri Lanka and Ghana.
  • Vulnerability to Coercion: Global South nations frequently face secondary sanctions or loss of preferential market access when attempting to trade with states sanctioned by global financial powers.

Environmental Injustices and Stalled Climate Action

The failure of global superpowers to cooperate has directly compromised the ecological survival of low-emitting nations:

  • Emissions Disparity: The United States and China collectively generate over 40% of global annual greenhouse gas emissions, yet geopolitical mistrust repeatedly delays high-ambition multilateral mitigation targets.
  • Existential Threats to SIDS: Small Island Developing States (SIDS) and low-lying coastal populations endure intensifying tropical cyclones, sea-level rise, and ecological degradation despite contributing negligibly to historical emissions.
  • Climate Finance Deficits: Superpower friction stymies equitable climate adaptation financing. Financial commitments to the Loss and Damage Fund remain under 0.2% of the estimated $400 billion required annually by developing countries.

Conclusion

To safeguard their sovereignty and sustainable development, nations of the Global South must resist zero-sum alliances and institutionalise collective bargaining. Leveraging platforms such as the expanded BRICS, the G20, and the African Union, developing countries can advance reformed multilateralism, uphold strategic autonomy, and demand equitable global governance that protects the vulnerable from great-power crossfire.

Key facts to remember

definition
Weaponised Interdependence

The strategic exploitation of centralized hub-and-spoke networks in global trade, finance, or information by powerful states to exert geopolitical leverage and coerce other actors.

statistic

The United States and China together account for more than 40 percent of total global greenhouse gas emissions.

statistic

Initial pledges to the UN Loss and Damage Fund stood at roughly $780 million, falling far short of the estimated $400 billion needed annually by developing nations.

example
Horn of Africa Food Insecurity

Blockages along the Black Sea grain corridor during the Russia-NATO proxy conflict caused a severe wheat and fertilizer supply disruption across East Africa.

Frequently asked questions

How does great power rivalry hinder multilateral climate action?

Geopolitical contestation leads superpowers to prioritize national industrial dominance and strategic competition over binding mitigation commitments, stalling collaborative climate transfers and underfunding global adaptation mechanisms.