Introduction
India's federal architecture, enshrined in Article 246 and the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution, balances national integrity with regional autonomy across a three-tier governance system. While the framework provides distinct legislative, administrative, and financial jurisdictions, operational frictions continually test the equilibrium among the Union, States, and local bodies.
Union-State Relations: Key Issues and Challenges
The operational balance between the Centre and the States encounters several constitutional, administrative, and fiscal strains:
- Executive Friction and the Role of Governors: Discretionary powers exercised by Governors during government formation, hung assemblies, and the reservation of state bills for presidential assent have frequently strained intergovernmental trust. The Supreme Court in S.R. Bommai v. Union of India (mandating floor tests to verify legislative majority) and B.P. Singhal v. Union of India (prohibiting arbitrary removal of Governors) placed critical judicial checks on executive overreach.
- Institutional Deficit: Intergovernmental dispute resolution mechanisms under Article 263 remain underutilised. The Punchhi Commission recommended revitalising the Inter-State Council (ISC) by making it a vibrant forum for consensus-building and proposing the transfer of its secretariat to the Rajya Sabha to ensure institutional neutrality.
- Fiscal Asymmetry: A structural vertical imbalance exists, wherein States incur approximately 60% of total developmental expenditure while generating only about 40% of public revenue. This imbalance is compounded by the Centre's increasing reliance on cesses and surcharges—accounting for nearly 14% of Gross Tax Revenue in FY 2024-25—which are excluded from the divisible tax pool and diminish the effective tax devolution mandated at 41% by the Fifteenth Finance Commission.
Devolution of Power and Finance to Local Governments
Despite constitutional status conferred by the 73rd and 74th Constitutional Amendment Acts, decentralised governance faces systemic bottlenecks:
- Functional and Administrative Stagnation: State governments have been hesitant to devolve all 29 subjects under the Eleventh Schedule and 18 subjects under the Twelfth Schedule. Moreover, parallel bureaucratic structures and state parastatal bodies often supersede Panchayati Raj Institutions (PRIs) and Urban Local Bodies (ULBs), weakening grassroots self-governance.
- Financial Paralysis and Dependency: According to the Reserve Bank of India's Report on Municipal and Local Finances, own-source revenue mobilization remains critically low, with PRIs depending on upper-tier grants for roughly 95% of their total revenue. Weak property tax collection and irregular constitution of State Finance Commissions (SFCs) further deprive local bodies of predictable and autonomous financial resources.
Conclusion
Strengthening cooperative federalism requires operationalising constitutional consultative forums like an empowered Inter-State Council, rationalising the proliferation of non-shareable cesses, and enforcing regular State Finance Commission recommendations. Only by pairing functional devolution with robust local financial autonomy can India realise an effective bottom-up democratic governance model.