Dalvoy Logo
Dalvoy
UPSC MainsGeneral Studies Paper IIIndian PolityPractice question

Role of Parliamentary Committees in Legislative Quality

Critically examine how parliamentary committees enhance the efficiency and quality of legislative work in the Parliament.

Critically examine~250 words3 min readmedium
Attempt it first, timed · optional

Write the answer on paper, as in the exam. Start the timer, keep to the word target.

00:00/ 11 min · 250 words

Done writing? Photograph the sheet and see how it scores against this model answer, with feedback on what to fix.

Upload your answer sheet

How to approach

Begin by contextualizing parliamentary committees within the constitutional framework of Articles 105 and 118(1). Next, analyze how they improve efficiency, consensus, and legislative quality, followed by critical challenges such as declining referrals, non-binding recommendations, and resource deficits. Conclude with institutional reforms like mandatory referrals and dedicated research support.

Model answer

408 words

Introduction

Parliamentary committees, rooted in Article 105 regarding privileges and constituted under Article 118(1) through rules of procedure, function as miniature legislatures. They bridge plenary constraints of floor time, technical expertise, and political polarization to ensure thorough scrutiny of legislative and executive actions.

Enhancing Efficiency and Legislative Quality

Parliamentary committees serve as vital deliberative mechanisms that deepen parliamentary democracy in several key ways:

  • Non-Partisan Scrutiny: Operating in-camera, committees deliberate away from public posturing, media scrutiny, and the immediate coercion of the party whip under the Tenth Schedule, fostering genuine cross-party consensus on contentious clauses.
  • Multi-Stakeholder Consultation: Committees remedy executive-drafting deficits by accepting technical memoranda and taking oral evidence from domain experts, civil society, and industry stakeholders, resulting in more robust legislation.
  • Statutory Interpretation: In Kalpana Mehta v. Union of India (2018), the Supreme Court ruled that parliamentary standing committee reports serve as admissible external aids for interpreting legislative intent without breaching parliamentary privilege.
  • Floor Time Optimization: Departmentally Related Standing Committees (DRSCs) perform granular line-by-line scrutiny of voluminous Demands for Grants and technical bills, preventing legislative bottlenecks and saving precious plenary floor time.

Critical Concerns and Institutional Dilution

Despite their design, several operational and systemic limitations curb the effective functioning of committees:

  • Circumvention and Declining Referrals: Routine deliberative scrutiny has eroded significantly. According to data from PRS Legislative Research, the proportion of bills referred to committees fell sharply from 71% in the 15th Lok Sabha to 27% in the 16th Lok Sabha, and further down to approximately 16% in the 17th Lok Sabha.
  • Advisory Stature: Recommendations are purely advisory and non-binding. Governments frequently reject suggested modifications or bypass scrutiny entirely by classifying bills as Money Bills or invoking guillotine closures without tabling detailed Action Taken Reports (ATRs).
  • Capacity and Tenure Deficits: The standard one-year tenure for members disrupts institutional memory and policy specialization. Furthermore, committees lack independent, institutional research secretariats comparable to the US Congressional Research Service.

Way Forward

To revitalize legislative oversight, committee referral should be institutionalized as a mandatory step for all major substantive bills, mirroring the UK House of Commons Public Bill Committees. Additionally, as recommended by the National Commission to Review the Working of the Constitution (NCRWC), standing committees should be equipped with permanent, specialized research cadres and extended member tenures.

Conclusion

Strengthening parliamentary committees is essential to revive Parliament's primary role as a deliberative institution rather than a mere law-clearing body. Ensuring institutionalized referrals and technical autonomy will uphold legislative rigor, transparency, and executive accountability.

Key facts to remember

case study
Kalpana Mehta v. Union of India (2018)

The Supreme Court held that parliamentary standing committee reports are admissible as external aids to ascertain legislative intent and historical background under Section 57 of the Indian Evidence Act, without infringing upon parliamentary privilege under Article 105.

statistic

The percentage of bills referred to parliamentary committees plummeted from 71% in the 15th Lok Sabha (2009–2014) to 27% in the 16th Lok Sabha and roughly 16% in the 17th Lok Sabha.

— PRS Legislative Research
scheme
Departmentally Related Standing Committees (DRSCs)

Introduced in 1993, these 24 cross-party committees scrutinize ministry-specific Demands for Grants, examine bills referred to them, and review annual ministry reports to secure executive accountability.

Frequently asked questions

Why are parliamentary committee proceedings conducted in camera?

In-camera proceedings permit members of parliament to engage in candid, objective deliberations free from party whips and public posturing, facilitating cross-party consensus on contentious policies.

← All questions on this topic (197)