Introduction
Drawing constitutional authority from Articles 105 (powers and privileges of Parliament) and 118(1) (rules of procedure), Parliamentary Committees function as a 'miniature Parliament'. By mirroring the proportional party composition of the legislature, they enable detailed, multi-party scrutiny away from populist rhetoric and floor interruptions.
Role as an Instrument of Legislative Accountability
- Non-Partisan Scrutiny: The 24 Departmentally Related Standing Committees (DRSCs), established in 1993, meticulously examine legislative bills, annual ministry reports, and budgetary Demands for Grants in an environment sheltered from public glare and partisan posturing.
- Financial Oversight: Key financial bodies like the Public Accounts Committee (PAC), the Estimates Committee, and the Committee on Public Undertakings act as post-mortem watchdogs of executive expenditure, ensuring adherence to parliamentary appropriations.
- Stakeholder and Expert Consultation: Committees bridge the gap between civil society and policymakers by integrating testimonies from external specialists and citizens before legislative measures are enacted, as demonstrated by the Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) on the Data Protection Bill.
Evaluation of Structural and Operational Constraints
- Declining Legislative Referrals: A marked reduction in the proportion of proposed legislation sent for committee vetting weakens institutional oversight. Data indicates a sharp decline from 71% of bills referred during the 15th Lok Sabha to just 16% in the 17th Lok Sabha.
- Circumventing Committee Vetting: The tactical classification of legislative measures as 'Money Bills' and the frequent suspension of business to pass legislation amid pandemonium often bypass parliamentary committee review altogether.
- Structural and Resource Limitations: The standard one-year tenure for committee members disrupts institutional memory and discourages domain specialisation, further exacerbated by inadequate independent research and technical secretariats.
- Advisory Authority: Recommendations produced by parliamentary panels are purely advisory and non-binding, leaving the executive with wide discretion on implementation.
Conclusion
To restore the efficacy of parliamentary committees as bulwarks of accountability, institutionalising the mandatory referral of substantive bills—as recommended by the National Commission to Review the Working of the Constitution (NCRWC)—alongside longer tenures and dedicated research support, is vital for safeguarding democratic checks and balances.