UPSC MainsSociology (Optional)Indian SocietyPractice question

Durkheim's View on Religion in Contemporary Society

Explain Durkheim's view on religion in contemporary society.

Explain~250 words3 min readmedium
Attempt it first, timed · optional

Write the answer on paper, as in the exam. Start the timer, keep to the word target.

00:00/ 11 min · 250 words

Done writing? Photograph the sheet and see how it scores against this model answer, with feedback on what to fix.

Upload your answer sheet

How to approach

Begin by establishing Émile Durkheim's functional definition of religion and his assertion that the sacred is an indispensable social reality. Detail the transition of religion in modernity through the secularisation of traditional dogma, the rise of the 'cult of the individual', and civic collective rituals. Conclude with a critical evaluation highlighting contemporary religious revivalism and deprivatisation.

Model answer

483 words

Introduction

In sociological thought, Émile Durkheim conceptualised religion not through supernatural beliefs or theological doctrines, but functionally as a unified system of beliefs and practices relative to sacred things that unites adherents into a moral community. In analyzing contemporary society, Durkheim posited that while the institutional authority and traditional dogmas of church-based religions decline under modernisation, the fundamental social necessity of the sacred and moral integration remains permanent.

Decline of Traditional Dogma and the Secularisation Process

Durkheim observed that scientific rationalism, intellectualisation, and the expanding division of labour progressively undermine ecclesiastical hegemony and traditional cosmological explanations. He famously captured this transitional disjunction by noting that "the old gods are dead, and others are not yet born." However, this does not herald the death of religion itself, but rather the obsolescence of outdated religious forms.

The 'Cult of the Individual' as Modern Sacredness

As modern societies transition from mechanical solidarity to organic solidarity, individual differentiation increases. In response, society requires a shared moral anchor that respects this pluralism:

  • The Human Person as Sacred: In Individualism and the Intellectuals (1898), Durkheim argued that the human individual becomes the supreme collective representation and object of reverence.
  • Institutionalised Human Rights: Not to be confused with egoistic utilitarianism, this 'cult of the individual' sanctifies universal human rights, individual dignity, and social justice as the overarching moral consensus binding differentiated modern individuals together.

Secular Rituals and Modern Civil Religion

Durkheim maintained that society periodically requires collective gatherings to revitalize shared values and moral energies:

  • Collective Effervescence in Secular Spheres: Secular events such as national commemorations, patriotic assemblies, and constitutional holidays generate collective effervescence, renewing feelings of solidarity without invoking the supernatural.
  • Prefiguring Civil Religion: This thesis directly informed Robert Bellah's subsequent sociological formulation of 'civil religion', wherein national symbols, founding narratives, and civic ideals function as functional equivalents of traditional religious systems.

Moral Lag and the Risk of Anomie

Durkheim cautioned that rapid socio-economic change could outpace the creation of new civic morality. The hiatus between decaying ecclesiastical moral frameworks and nascent civic institutions engenders normative deregulation, moral vacuum, and anomie, frequently manifesting as heightened egoism and modern pathologies.

Critical Evaluation in the Contemporary Context

While Durkheim accurately foresaw the sacralisation of human rights and secular civic institutions, his consensus-driven functionalism exhibits distinct limitations:

  • Deprivatisation of Religion: As sociologist José Casanova argued, traditional religions have not simply dissolved into private secular morality; instead, they have re-entered public and political spheres across the world.
  • Conflict and Fundamentalism: Durkheim underemphasized religion's capacity to serve as a catalyst for sectarian polarization, religious resurgence, and fundamentalist conflict rather than social cohesion.

Conclusion

Durkheim's analysis demonstrated that religion is an evolving social imperative rather than an archaic relic destined for complete erasure. Although contemporary religious fundamentalism and political resurgence challenge his evolutionary assumptions of civic sublimation, his insight that modern democratic societies depend upon a shared sacred consensus—crystallised in human rights and civic solidarity—remains profoundly relevant.

Key facts to remember

quote
"The old gods are dead, and others are not yet born."
Émile Durkheim on Modernity's Moral Transition
definition
Cult of the Individual

A concept formulated by Émile Durkheim where the human person, individual autonomy, and universal human rights become the sacred objects of reverence and the collective moral consensus in modern organic societies.

example
Civil Religion and National Commemorations

Sociologist Robert Bellah built on Durkheim's ideas to illustrate how modern nation-states use national days, constitutional anthems, and monuments to generate collective effervescence and reinforce social solidarity without supernatural dogmas.

Frequently asked questions

Did Durkheim believe religion would disappear completely in modern societies?

No. Durkheim argued that religion is an eternal social requirement. While traditional theologies and church doctrines decline under secularisation, society creates functional substitutes and secular sacred symbols, such as civic rituals and universal human rights.