UPSC MainsECONOMICS-PAPER-II201115 Marks150 Words
हिंदी में पढ़ें
Q12.

Write on second-generation economic reforms in India.

How to Approach

This question requires a focused answer on the second-generation economic reforms in India, differentiating them from the first wave of reforms initiated in 1991. The answer should highlight the areas of focus – industrial sector liberalization, financial sector reforms, fiscal consolidation, and infrastructure development. A chronological approach, outlining the key reforms within each area, is recommended. Mentioning the committees and policies associated with these reforms will add value. Structure: Introduction, Body (divided into sectors), and Conclusion.

Model Answer

0 min read

Introduction

The first generation of economic reforms in India, initiated in 1991, primarily focused on stabilization and liberalization – dismantling the License Raj, opening up to foreign investment, and initiating trade liberalization. However, these reforms were insufficient to address deeper structural issues hindering sustained economic growth. Consequently, the mid-1990s witnessed the launch of second-generation economic reforms, aimed at enhancing efficiency, productivity, and competitiveness across various sectors. These reforms moved beyond mere liberalization to focus on strengthening institutions, improving governance, and fostering a more dynamic and resilient economy.

Second Generation Economic Reforms in India

The second-generation reforms, largely implemented during the governments of P.V. Narasimha Rao, Atal Bihari Vajpayee, and Manmohan Singh, built upon the foundation laid by the 1991 reforms. They addressed critical areas requiring deeper structural changes.

1. Industrial Sector Liberalization

  • Dismantling of Industrial Licensing: Further reduction in the number of industries requiring licenses, promoting ease of doing business.
  • Liberalization of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI): Increased FDI limits in various sectors, attracting foreign capital and technology. The cap on FDI in insurance was raised to 26% in 1999.
  • Public Sector Reforms: Disinvestment in Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs) to improve efficiency and reduce the fiscal burden. The National Renewal Fund (NRF) was established in 1993 to facilitate the restructuring of PSUs.
  • Small Scale Industries (SSI) Deregulation: Increased investment limits for SSIs and simplified procedures.

2. Financial Sector Reforms

  • Banking Sector Reforms: Implementation of the Narasimham Committee recommendations (1998) focusing on recapitalization of banks, strengthening supervision, and improving prudential norms.
  • Interest Rate Liberalization: Gradual deregulation of interest rates, allowing banks greater flexibility in pricing loans.
  • Development of Capital Markets: Strengthening of SEBI (Securities and Exchange Board of India) and reforms in stock market regulations to promote transparency and investor protection.
  • Insurance Sector Liberalization: Opening up the insurance sector to private players in 2000, increasing competition and insurance penetration.

3. Fiscal Consolidation

  • Fiscal Responsibility Act (FRA), 2003: Enacted to ensure fiscal discipline and reduce the fiscal deficit. The FRA set targets for reducing the fiscal deficit and revenue deficit.
  • Tax Reforms: Simplification of the tax system, reduction in tax rates, and broadening of the tax base. Introduction of the Modified Value Added Tax (MODVAT) in 1986, a precursor to GST.
  • Subsidies Rationalization: Efforts to reduce inefficient subsidies, particularly in the fertilizer and power sectors.

4. Infrastructure Development

  • Private Participation in Infrastructure: Encouraging private sector investment in infrastructure projects through Build-Operate-Transfer (BOT) and other Public-Private Partnership (PPP) models.
  • National Highways Development Project (NHDP): Launched in 1998 to improve the quality and connectivity of national highways.
  • Power Sector Reforms: Attempts to restructure state electricity boards and promote private sector participation in power generation and distribution. The Electricity Act, 2003, aimed to address issues in the power sector.

These reforms were not without challenges. Implementation faced resistance from vested interests, bureaucratic hurdles, and political constraints. The pace of reforms varied across sectors, and some areas, like labour law reforms, remained largely unaddressed.

Conclusion

The second-generation economic reforms were crucial in consolidating the gains of the 1991 reforms and laying the foundation for higher economic growth. While these reforms addressed several structural weaknesses, challenges remain in areas like infrastructure development, fiscal management, and labour market flexibility. Continued reforms, focusing on improving governance, enhancing human capital, and promoting innovation, are essential for sustaining India’s economic momentum and achieving inclusive growth in the long run.

Answer Length

This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.

Additional Resources

Key Definitions

Fiscal Deficit
The difference between the government’s total expenditure and its total revenue, excluding borrowings. It indicates the amount of money the government needs to borrow to finance its spending.
Prudential Norms
Standards and regulations designed to ensure the safety and soundness of financial institutions, typically relating to capital adequacy, asset classification, and risk management.

Key Statistics

India's fiscal deficit as a percentage of GDP decreased from 6.8% in 2003-04 (post-FRA implementation) to 3.4% in 2017-18 (pre-pandemic).

Source: Reserve Bank of India (RBI) reports (knowledge cutoff 2024)

FDI inflows into India increased significantly after the second-generation reforms, rising from $2.3 billion in 1995-96 to $36.77 billion in 2018-19.

Source: Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade (DPIIT) (knowledge cutoff 2024)

Examples

Disinvestment of Maruti Udyog Limited

The disinvestment of Maruti Udyog Limited in 2002, where the government reduced its stake to 45%, is a prime example of second-generation reforms aimed at improving PSU efficiency and generating revenue.

Frequently Asked Questions

How did the second-generation reforms differ from the 1991 reforms?

The 1991 reforms were primarily focused on stabilization and liberalization, addressing the balance of payments crisis. The second-generation reforms went deeper, focusing on structural changes to enhance efficiency, productivity, and competitiveness across various sectors.

Topics Covered

EconomyIndian EconomyEconomic PolicyLiberalizationGlobalization