UPSC MainsMEDICAL-SCIENCE-PAPER-I201112 Marks
Q25.

A 50-year male has been found hanged in a bath-room along with incised wound on wrist, groin and cubital region. How will you establish cause of death and opine whether he has expired of hanging or injuries sustained ?

How to Approach

This question requires a systematic forensic approach to determine the cause of death. The answer should focus on differentiating between death due to hanging and death due to the incised wounds, considering the sequence of events and post-mortem findings. Key areas to cover include examination of the hanging site, ligature mark analysis, wound characteristics, and internal examination findings. A structured approach, detailing the investigative steps and potential findings, is crucial.

Model Answer

0 min read

Introduction

Determining the cause of death in cases involving multiple injuries, such as hanging combined with self-inflicted wounds, presents a significant challenge in forensic medicine. The principle of 'all injuries must be accounted for' is paramount. The presence of both ligature marks consistent with hanging and incised wounds necessitates a thorough investigation to ascertain whether the hanging was the primary cause of death, or if the injuries contributed significantly, or were even the primary cause, with the hanging being a secondary event. This requires a detailed post-mortem examination and careful reconstruction of the events leading to death.

I. Initial Scene Investigation

The initial scene investigation is crucial. Documentation should include:

  • Position of the body: Was the body fully suspended, or was there ground contact?
  • Ligature material: Type of material used (rope, cloth, etc.), its strength, and condition.
  • Ligature mark: Location, depth, and characteristics of the ligature mark on the neck.
  • Wound examination: Detailed description of the incised wounds – location (wrist, groin, cubital region), size, depth, direction, and any evidence of hesitation marks.
  • Surrounding environment: Any signs of struggle, presence of a stool or other object used for support, and any other relevant findings.

II. Post-Mortem Examination – External Examination

A meticulous external examination is essential:

  • Ligature Mark: A complete circular or incomplete ligature mark is noted. The depth and elasticity of the mark are assessed.
  • Incised Wounds: Each wound is examined individually. The angle of incision, sharpness of the edges, and presence of any defensive wounds are noted. The depth of the wounds is crucial – wounds that sever major blood vessels are more likely to contribute to rapid blood loss.
  • Other Injuries: Any other injuries, such as abrasions or contusions, are documented.
  • Pallor and Cyanosis: The presence and extent of pallor (paleness) and cyanosis (bluish discoloration) can provide clues about the time of death and the cause.

III. Post-Mortem Examination – Internal Examination

The internal examination focuses on identifying injuries consistent with hanging and assessing the effects of the incised wounds:

  • Hyoid Bone and Thyroid Cartilage: Fractures of the hyoid bone or thyroid cartilage are often seen in hanging, but their absence does not rule out hanging.
  • Spinal Cord: Examination for evidence of spinal cord injury.
  • Lungs: Signs of congestion, edema, and petechial hemorrhages are common in hanging.
  • Brain: Examination for cerebral edema and hemorrhages.
  • Major Blood Vessels: The internal examination must meticulously assess the extent of damage to major blood vessels in the areas of the incised wounds. Evidence of significant blood loss is critical.
  • Stomach Contents: Analysis of stomach contents can help estimate the time of death.

IV. Establishing the Cause of Death – Differentiating Hanging vs. Injuries

The following factors are considered to differentiate between death due to hanging and death due to the injuries:

  • Sequence of Events: If the wounds are clearly inflicted *before* the hanging, it suggests a deliberate attempt to ensure death. If the wounds are inflicted *after* a failed hanging attempt, it suggests a change in intent.
  • Severity of Wounds: If the incised wounds are deep enough to cause fatal hemorrhage, they could be the primary cause of death, with the hanging being a secondary event or an attempt to conceal suicide.
  • Blood Loss: Significant blood loss from the incised wounds, confirmed by internal examination, strongly suggests the wounds contributed to or caused death.
  • Ligature Mark Characteristics: Typical features of a suicidal hanging include a complete or nearly complete ligature mark, upward trajectory of the ligature, and absence of defensive wounds on the hands and arms.
  • Pathological Findings: The presence of characteristic post-mortem changes associated with hanging (e.g., congestion of lungs, petechial hemorrhages) supports the diagnosis of hanging.

V. Opining on the Cause of Death

The forensic pathologist will opine based on the totality of the evidence. Possible opinions include:

  • Death due to Hanging: If the ligature mark is typical, internal findings are consistent with hanging, and the wounds are superficial or do not explain the cause of death.
  • Death due to Incised Wounds: If the wounds are deep and caused significant blood loss, and the hanging appears to be a secondary event.
  • Combined Effect of Hanging and Incised Wounds: If both hanging and the wounds contributed to death, and it is difficult to determine which was the primary cause.
  • Undetermined: If the evidence is insufficient to establish a definitive cause of death.

Conclusion

In conclusion, establishing the cause of death in this case requires a thorough and systematic forensic investigation. Careful examination of the scene, detailed post-mortem findings, and a logical reconstruction of events are crucial. The pathologist must consider the sequence of injuries, the severity of the wounds, and the presence of characteristic findings associated with hanging to arrive at a scientifically sound opinion. The opinion should be based on the totality of the evidence and clearly articulate the reasoning behind the conclusion.

Answer Length

This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.

Additional Resources

Key Statistics

According to the National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB) data (2022), suicide accounted for 3.3% of total registered crimes in India, with hanging being a common method.

Source: NCRB, Crime in India Report 2022

Globally, suicide is the fourth leading cause of death among 15-29 year-olds (WHO, 2021).

Source: World Health Organization (WHO), 2021

Examples

The Aarushi Talwar Case

The Aarushi Talwar case (2008) highlighted the complexities of forensic evidence in homicide investigations. The initial findings were contested, and the case demonstrated the importance of meticulous scene investigation and accurate interpretation of forensic data.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the significance of hyoid bone fracture in hanging?

While hyoid bone fracture is often associated with hanging, it is not always present. Its absence does not rule out hanging, as the fracture rate varies significantly depending on the height of the fall and the individual's anatomy.

Topics Covered

Forensic MedicinePathologyCause of DeathHangingInjuries