UPSC MainsPUBLIC-ADMINISTRATION-PAPER-II201120 Marks200 Words
हिंदी में पढ़ें
Q12.

Absence of District Planning Committees in a large number of districts has prevented convergence of planning at the district level." Examine the above statement with examples.

How to Approach

This question requires an examination of the impact of the lack of functional District Planning Committees (DPCs) on planning convergence at the district level. The answer should begin by defining DPCs and their intended role. It should then detail how their absence hinders convergence, providing specific examples of planning failures or inefficiencies. Discuss the 73rd and 74th Constitutional Amendment Acts as the foundation for decentralized planning. Finally, suggest measures to revitalize DPCs. Structure: Introduction, Role of DPCs, Impact of Absence, Examples, Way Forward, Conclusion.

Model Answer

0 min read

Introduction

The 73rd and 74th Constitutional Amendment Acts (1992) envisioned a three-tier Panchayati Raj and Municipal system, aiming to decentralize planning and empower local bodies. Central to this vision were District Planning Committees (DPCs), tasked with consolidating plans from lower tiers and integrating them with state and national plans. However, a significant number of districts across India continue to operate without fully functional DPCs, severely impeding the convergence of planning efforts and hindering effective local development. This absence has resulted in fragmented approaches, duplication of efforts, and suboptimal utilization of resources.

The Role of District Planning Committees

DPCs, as envisaged in Article 243ZD of the Constitution, are crucial for preparing district plans, integrating plans prepared by Panchayats and Municipalities, and ensuring their alignment with state and national development goals. They are composed of elected representatives from the district, members of Parliament and State Legislatures representing the district, and officials from various departments. Their core functions include:

  • Consolidating plans from Block Samitis and Municipalities.
  • Identifying resource gaps and prioritizing projects.
  • Monitoring the implementation of plans.
  • Facilitating coordination between different departments.

Impact of Absence of Functional DPCs

The absence of functional DPCs leads to several detrimental consequences:

  • Lack of Convergence: Without a central coordinating body, schemes implemented by different departments often operate in silos, leading to duplication and inefficiencies. For example, MGNREGA works might be undertaken in areas already covered by irrigation projects under the Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchayee Yojana (PMKSY), resulting in wasted resources.
  • Fragmented Planning: Plans are often prepared in a top-down manner, without adequate input from local bodies, leading to a mismatch between local needs and development priorities.
  • Ineffective Resource Allocation: Without a consolidated district plan, resource allocation becomes arbitrary and inefficient, favoring projects based on political considerations rather than developmental needs.
  • Weakened Local Governance: The absence of DPCs undermines the spirit of decentralization and weakens the capacity of local bodies to participate in the planning process.

Examples Illustrating the Problem

Several states demonstrate the negative consequences of non-functional DPCs:

  • Bihar: A 2018 report by the Ministry of Panchayati Raj highlighted that DPCs were largely non-functional in many districts of Bihar, leading to poor implementation of centrally sponsored schemes and a lack of coordination between different departments.
  • Uttar Pradesh: Despite constitutional provisions, DPCs in Uttar Pradesh have faced challenges related to political interference and bureaucratic hurdles, hindering their ability to effectively consolidate plans and monitor implementation.
  • Odisha: While Odisha has made progress in establishing DPCs, their effectiveness is often limited by a lack of adequate funding and capacity building.

Revitalizing District Planning Committees: A Way Forward

To address this issue, the following measures are crucial:

  • Strengthening Legal Framework: State governments need to enact legislation to clearly define the functions, powers, and responsibilities of DPCs.
  • Ensuring Adequate Funding: DPCs require dedicated funding to support their operational costs, including staffing, training, and data collection.
  • Capacity Building: Training programs should be conducted for DPC members and officials to enhance their planning, monitoring, and coordination skills.
  • Promoting Participation: Local bodies and civil society organizations should be actively involved in the planning process to ensure that plans are responsive to local needs.
  • Regular Monitoring and Evaluation: The performance of DPCs should be regularly monitored and evaluated to identify areas for improvement.

Conclusion

The absence of functional DPCs represents a significant impediment to effective decentralized planning and governance in India. Revitalizing these committees is essential for achieving convergence, ensuring efficient resource allocation, and empowering local bodies. A concerted effort by state governments, supported by the central government, is needed to strengthen the legal framework, provide adequate funding, and build the capacity of DPCs to fulfill their intended role in the development process. Only then can the vision of truly decentralized and participatory planning be realized.

Answer Length

This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.

Additional Resources

Key Definitions

Decentralization
The transfer of planning, decision-making, and resource allocation authority from central authorities to lower levels of government, such as local bodies.
Convergence
The process of integrating different schemes and programs to maximize their impact and avoid duplication of efforts.

Key Statistics

As of 2022, only 30% of districts in India have fully functional DPCs, according to a report by the Centre for Policy Research (CPR).

Source: Centre for Policy Research (CPR), 2022

A study by the Indian Institute of Public Administration (IIPA) in 2020 found that districts with functional DPCs had a 20% higher rate of implementation of centrally sponsored schemes.

Source: Indian Institute of Public Administration (IIPA), 2020

Examples

Kerala’s People’s Planning Campaign

Kerala’s People’s Planning Campaign (1996-97) demonstrated the potential of decentralized planning when DPCs were actively involved in identifying local needs and allocating resources. This resulted in significant improvements in infrastructure and social development.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the difference between a District Planning Committee and a District Development Council?

While both are related to district-level planning, a District Planning Committee focuses on consolidating plans from lower tiers and ensuring their alignment with state and national goals. A District Development Council is a broader body that oversees the overall development of the district, including implementation and monitoring.

Topics Covered

GovernancePolityDistrict PlanningLocal GovernanceDevelopment Planning