UPSC MainsANTHROPOLOGY-PAPER-II201220 Marks
हिंदी में पढ़ें
Q11.

Using suitable examples, bring out the historical processes of the social exclusion of denotified tribes.

How to Approach

This question requires a historical understanding of how specific communities were stigmatized and excluded. The approach should be chronological, tracing the origins of denotification, its impact on social exclusion, and subsequent efforts at redressal. Key areas to cover include the Criminal Tribes Act, its repeal, the continued marginalization faced by these communities, and the role of state policies and societal prejudices. Examples from various states like Maharashtra, Bihar, and Uttar Pradesh will be vital to illustrate the processes.

Model Answer

0 min read

Introduction

The term "Denotified Tribes" (DNTs) refers to communities formerly notified under the Criminal Tribes Act, 1871. These communities, predominantly nomadic and semi-nomadic, were historically labelled as "born criminals" and subjected to oppressive surveillance and control. Following independence, the Criminal Tribes Act was repealed in 1959, but the stigma and social exclusion associated with denotification persisted, leading to systemic marginalization. This answer will explore the historical processes that led to the social exclusion of DNTs, using examples to illustrate the enduring impact of colonial policies and post-colonial societal biases. Understanding this history is crucial for crafting effective inclusion policies today.

Historical Context: The Criminal Tribes Act, 1871

The genesis of denotification lies in the Criminal Tribes Act of 1871, enacted by the British colonial government. This Act, and subsequent amendments, designated certain groups as "born criminals," effectively criminalizing their very existence. These communities were often targeted due to their nomadic lifestyle, perceived lack of settled employment, and resistance to colonial control. The Act empowered officials to arrest and monitor individuals belonging to these tribes, restricting their movement and livelihood.

The criteria for notification were arbitrary and often based on prejudiced observations by colonial administrators. Communities like the Bawarias of Rajasthan, the Pardhis of Maharashtra, the Ervachulas of Andhra Pradesh, and the Nat people of Karnataka were included, facing severe repercussions.

Processes of Social Exclusion Post-Repeal of the Criminal Tribes Act

While the Criminal Tribes Act was repealed in 1959, its legacy continued to shape the social and economic realities of DNTs. The stigma attached to these communities didn't disappear; instead, it manifested in new forms of discrimination and exclusion.

1. Stigma and Prejudice:

The label of "criminal" embedded in the collective consciousness of society continued to affect DNTs. This led to:

  • Discrimination in employment: Employers were hesitant to hire individuals from DNT communities, fearing association with criminality.
  • Social ostracism: DNTs faced rejection and exclusion from mainstream society, limiting their access to social networks and opportunities.
  • Harassment by law enforcement: Police often subjected DNTs to unwarranted scrutiny and harassment, perpetuating the cycle of suspicion and mistrust.

2. Economic Marginalization:

The traditional occupations of many DNTs, such as hunting, gathering, and performing at festivals, were disrupted by modernization and environmental changes. The Act had already restricted their mobility, limiting their ability to find alternative livelihoods. This resulted in:

  • Landlessness: Many DNTs were denied land ownership, further restricting their economic opportunities.
  • Lack of access to credit: Financial institutions were reluctant to provide loans to DNTs due to perceived risk.
  • Dependence on casual labor: DNTs were often forced to take up precarious and low-paying jobs, perpetuating poverty.

3. Political Exclusion:

DNTs have historically been underrepresented in political decision-making, limiting their ability to advocate for their rights and interests. Factors contributing to this include:

  • Lack of political awareness: Limited access to education and information hindered political participation.
  • Social stigma: The stigma associated with denotification discouraged DNTs from entering politics.
  • Limited representation in local governance: DNTs often lacked adequate representation in local councils and other government bodies.

Case Study: The Pardhi Community of Maharashtra

The Pardhi community of Maharashtra is a prime example of the enduring social exclusion faced by DNTs. Notified under the Criminal Tribes Act, Pardhis continue to experience severe discrimination. They face restrictions on their traditional occupation (hunting), are often denied access to government schemes, and are subjected to social stigma. A 2015 study by the Tata Institute of Social Sciences (TISS) highlighted the pervasive discrimination faced by Pardhis in Maharashtra, emphasizing the need for targeted interventions to address their marginalization.

Government Initiatives and Challenges

The Indian government has implemented various schemes and policies aimed at addressing the challenges faced by DNTs. These include:

  • National Commission for Denotified, Nomadic and Other Backward Tribes (NCDNT): Established in 2004, this commission is responsible for advising the government on issues related to DNTs.
  • Merit-cum-Means Scholarship Scheme: Provides financial assistance to DNT students pursuing higher education.
  • Special Component Plan (SCP): Ensures that the benefits of government schemes reach DNT communities.

However, implementation of these initiatives has been hampered by several challenges, including:

  • Lack of awareness: Many DNTs are unaware of the schemes and policies available to them.
  • Bureaucratic hurdles: Complex procedures and bureaucratic delays often prevent DNTs from accessing benefits.
  • Social stigma: The deep-rooted social stigma continues to impede progress.
Community State Traditional Occupation Current Challenges
Bawaria Rajasthan Hunting, agriculture Landlessness, social stigma
Pardhi Maharashtra Hunting, scavenging Discrimination, lack of opportunities
Nat Karnataka Performing arts Economic hardship, social exclusion

Conclusion

The historical processes of social exclusion of denotified tribes are a stark reminder of the enduring legacy of colonial policies and societal prejudices. While the repeal of the Criminal Tribes Act was a significant step, the stigma and marginalization associated with denotification continue to affect these communities. Addressing this complex issue requires a multi-pronged approach, including targeted interventions to promote economic empowerment, social inclusion, and political participation. A shift in societal attitudes, coupled with effective implementation of government schemes, is crucial to ensure that DNTs can fully realize their potential and contribute to a more equitable and just society.

Answer Length

This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.

Additional Resources

Key Definitions

Denotified Tribes (DNTs)
Communities formerly notified under the Criminal Tribes Act, 1871, and subsequently denotified after the Act's repeal.
Criminal Tribes Act, 1871
A British colonial law that designated certain communities as "born criminals," subjecting them to oppressive surveillance and control.

Key Statistics

Approximately 160 communities are currently recognized as Denotified Tribes in India. (Source: NCDNT website - Knowledge cutoff)

Source: NCDNT

The Criminal Tribes Act was repealed in 1959, marking a significant, albeit delayed, shift in policy.

Source: Historical records

Examples

Pardhi Community Case Study

The Pardhi community in Maharashtra exemplifies the ongoing discrimination and marginalization faced by DNTs despite the repeal of the Criminal Tribes Act.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why were communities notified under the Criminal Tribes Act?

Communities were notified based on arbitrary and prejudiced observations by colonial administrators, often due to their nomadic lifestyle, perceived resistance to colonial rule, and perceived involvement in criminal activities.

Topics Covered

AnthropologyIndian HistorySociologySocial JusticeMarginalized CommunitiesHistorical Discrimination