Dalvoy Logo
Dalvoy
UPSC MainsSOCIOLOGY-PAPER-I201212 Marks150 Words
हिंदी में पढ़ें
Q17.

Theory of Cultural Lag-Ogburn and Nimkoff.

How to Approach

This question requires a detailed explanation of Ogburn’s theory of cultural lag. The answer should begin by defining culture and its components, then introduce the theory, explaining its core concepts – material culture and non-material culture. It should then elaborate on how the lag occurs, providing examples. Finally, the answer should briefly discuss criticisms and contemporary relevance. A structured approach with clear definitions and examples is crucial for a good score.

Model Answer

0 min read

Introduction

Culture, encompassing shared beliefs, values, norms, and material objects, is a dynamic entity constantly evolving. However, this evolution doesn’t occur uniformly across all its components. William F. Ogburn, along with Franklin H. Nimkoff, proposed the theory of ‘Cultural Lag’ in 1936, to explain this uneven rate of change. This theory posits that material culture (technology, infrastructure) typically changes faster than non-material culture (values, beliefs, laws), creating a period of disequilibrium and social problems. Understanding this lag is crucial for comprehending societal adjustments and conflicts.

Understanding the Core Concepts

Ogburn distinguished between two primary aspects of culture:

  • Material Culture: This refers to the physical objects created by a society – technology, infrastructure, tools, and machines. It’s tangible and readily observable.
  • Non-Material Culture: This encompasses the intangible aspects of culture – values, beliefs, norms, laws, customs, and ideologies. It’s abstract and often slower to change.

The Mechanism of Cultural Lag

Cultural lag occurs when changes in material culture outpace the ability of non-material culture to adapt. This creates a gap or ‘lag’ between the two. Ogburn identified several factors contributing to this lag:

  • Habitual Tendencies: People are resistant to changing deeply ingrained habits and beliefs.
  • Conflicting Cultural Elements: New technologies may clash with existing values and norms.
  • Differential Rates of Acceptance: Different segments of society adopt new technologies at varying rates.

Illustrative Examples of Cultural Lag

Numerous examples demonstrate the phenomenon of cultural lag:

  • The Automobile & Traffic Laws: The invention of the automobile drastically altered transportation, but the development of traffic laws, road infrastructure, and driver education lagged behind, initially leading to chaos and accidents.
  • In-Vitro Fertilization (IVF) & Ethical Debates: The technological advancement of IVF presented ethical dilemmas regarding the definition of parenthood, the status of embryos, and reproductive rights. Legal and societal norms struggled to keep pace.
  • Social Media & Privacy Concerns: The rapid proliferation of social media platforms has raised significant concerns about data privacy, online harassment, and misinformation. Laws and regulations are still evolving to address these challenges.
  • Artificial Intelligence (AI) & Job Displacement: The increasing automation driven by AI raises concerns about job displacement and the need for workforce retraining. Social safety nets and educational systems are struggling to adapt.

Criticisms of the Theory

Despite its influence, Ogburn’s theory has faced criticism:

  • Oversimplification: Critics argue that the theory oversimplifies the complex relationship between material and non-material culture. Change isn’t always linear or unidirectional.
  • Difficulty in Measurement: Quantifying and measuring the ‘lag’ between material and non-material culture is challenging.
  • Cultural Diffusion: The theory doesn’t adequately account for the role of cultural diffusion in spreading both material and non-material elements.

Contemporary Relevance

The theory of cultural lag remains highly relevant in the 21st century, particularly in the context of rapid technological advancements. The digital divide, ethical concerns surrounding biotechnology, and the societal impact of climate change all exemplify situations where material changes are outpacing our ability to adapt culturally and institutionally.

Conclusion

The theory of cultural lag, proposed by Ogburn and Nimkoff, provides a valuable framework for understanding the challenges of societal adaptation in the face of rapid technological change. While not without its limitations, the theory highlights the importance of proactively addressing the ethical, legal, and social implications of new technologies to minimize disruption and ensure a harmonious integration of material and non-material culture. Recognizing and mitigating cultural lag is crucial for fostering sustainable and equitable societal development.

Answer Length

This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.

Evaluate your handwritten answer in under a minute

Free trial available • Trusted by 1,00,000+ aspirants

Additional Resources

Key Definitions

Material Culture
The physical manifestations of a culture, including tangible objects like tools, technology, infrastructure, and art.
Non-Material Culture
The intangible aspects of a culture, encompassing beliefs, values, norms, language, and social practices.

Key Statistics

According to Statista (2023), global smartphone users reached 6.92 billion, representing approximately 85.6% of the world’s population.

Source: Statista, 2023

A 2022 Pew Research Center study found that 64% of Americans believe social media companies have too much power over political discourse.

Source: Pew Research Center, 2022

Examples

The Green Revolution

The introduction of high-yielding varieties of crops during the Green Revolution (1960s-70s) was a material change. However, the social and economic consequences – land consolidation, increased inequality, and environmental degradation – lagged behind, creating significant social problems.

Gene Editing Technologies (CRISPR)

CRISPR technology allows for precise gene editing, a significant material advancement. However, ethical debates surrounding its use in humans, particularly germline editing, are ongoing, demonstrating a cultural lag in establishing appropriate regulations and societal consensus.

Frequently Asked Questions

▶Is cultural lag always negative?

Not necessarily. While it often leads to social problems, cultural lag can also create opportunities for innovation and adaptation. The period of disequilibrium can stimulate debate, policy changes, and the development of new norms.

Topics Covered

SociologyCultureTechnological Change, Social Institutions, Values, Adaptation
Back to all SOCIOLOGY-PAPER-I 2012 questions