UPSC MainsECONOMICS-PAPER-II201325 Marks
हिंदी में पढ़ें
Q17.

What is the present policy of disinvestment of the Government of India? What modifications can be introduced in order to make it fruit-bearing?

How to Approach

This question requires a nuanced understanding of India’s disinvestment policy, its evolution, and the challenges hindering its success. The answer should begin by defining disinvestment and outlining the current policy framework. It should then critically analyze the existing approach, identifying its shortcomings, and propose concrete modifications to enhance its effectiveness. Focus on both strategic and procedural changes, considering the macroeconomic context and investor sentiment. A balanced approach acknowledging both the benefits and drawbacks of disinvestment is crucial.

Model Answer

0 min read

Introduction

Disinvestment, broadly defined as the sale of government-owned shares in Public Sector Enterprises (PSEs), has been a cornerstone of India’s economic reforms since 1991. Initially aimed at reducing the fiscal burden and improving efficiency, the policy has evolved over time, with recent emphasis on strategic disinvestment – transferring control of PSEs to private entities. The current policy, as outlined by the Department of Investment and Public Asset Management (DIPAM), prioritizes minimizing government intervention and maximizing enterprise value. However, despite several attempts, the disinvestment targets have often been missed, prompting a re-evaluation of the approach and the need for modifications to make it truly fruit-bearing.

Current Policy of Disinvestment

The present policy of disinvestment in India is guided by the following principles:

  • Strategic Disinvestment: Transferring the management control and substantial portion of the shareholding to a private sector entity. This is the preferred mode.
  • Minority Stake Sale: Selling a portion of government shares without relinquishing control. This is used when strategic disinvestment isn’t feasible.
  • Initial Public Offerings (IPOs): Listing PSEs on stock exchanges to raise capital.
  • Buyback: PSEs buying back their own shares from the government.

DIPAM, under the Ministry of Finance, is the nodal agency responsible for overseeing the disinvestment process. The process typically involves:

  1. In-principle approval from the Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs (CCEA).
  2. Appointment of advisors (legal, financial, etc.).
  3. Due diligence and valuation.
  4. Expression of Interest (EOI) and Request for Proposal (RFP).
  5. Final approval and transaction closure.

Challenges Hindering Disinvestment

Despite the well-defined framework, several challenges impede the successful implementation of the disinvestment policy:

  • Valuation Disagreements: Differences between the government’s valuation of PSEs and potential bidders often stall the process.
  • Labour Issues: Concerns about job security and employee benefits often lead to resistance from unions.
  • Political Opposition: Disinvestment is often viewed as anti-worker or privatization, attracting political criticism.
  • Macroeconomic Conditions: Adverse market conditions and economic slowdowns can dampen investor interest.
  • Lack of Preparedness: PSEs are often not adequately prepared for privatization, lacking transparency and efficient management practices.
  • Regulatory Hurdles: Complex regulatory approvals and bureaucratic delays can prolong the process.

Modifications for a Fruit-Bearing Disinvestment Policy

1. Strengthening the Institutional Framework

Establishing an independent body, similar to the UK’s UK Government Investments, could streamline the disinvestment process, insulate it from political interference, and ensure professional valuation and transaction management.

2. Addressing Labour Concerns Proactively

Implementing a comprehensive rehabilitation package for employees, including retraining programs, early retirement schemes, and social safety nets, can mitigate resistance from unions. A clear articulation of post-disinvestment employment guarantees can also build trust.

3. Enhancing Transparency and Corporate Governance

Mandating PSEs to adopt international accounting standards, improve disclosure norms, and strengthen board independence can enhance their attractiveness to investors. Regular performance audits and independent valuations are crucial.

4. Strategic Disinvestment with Clear Objectives

Focusing on strategic disinvestment in sectors where private sector participation can bring in technological expertise, efficiency gains, and innovation. Clearly defining the objectives of disinvestment – revenue generation, improved efficiency, or strategic realignment – can guide the process.

5. Utilizing Alternative Disinvestment Mechanisms

Exploring alternative mechanisms like Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) and bundled sales of PSEs can broaden the investor base and expedite the process. Consideration should be given to cross-listing on international stock exchanges.

6. Streamlining Regulatory Approvals

Establishing a fast-track mechanism for regulatory approvals and reducing bureaucratic delays can accelerate the disinvestment process. A single-window clearance system can be implemented.

7. Ring-fencing Essential Services

While pursuing disinvestment, it’s crucial to ensure that essential services provided by PSEs are not compromised. Appropriate regulatory safeguards and universal service obligations should be put in place.

Recent Trends and Examples

The Air India disinvestment in January 2022, after decades of attempts, marked a significant milestone. However, the process was protracted and involved substantial government guarantees. The recent IPO of Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) in May 2022, while successful in terms of subscription, faced criticism regarding valuation. The government is currently pursuing disinvestment in several other PSEs, including IDBI Bank and Shipping Corporation of India.

PSE Disinvestment Status (as of Nov 2023) Challenges Faced
Air India Privatized (Jan 2022) High debt, labour issues, valuation disagreements
LIC IPO (May 2022) Valuation concerns, market volatility
IDBI Bank Disinvestment in progress Finding suitable strategic buyer

Conclusion

In conclusion, while the disinvestment policy has the potential to unlock significant value and improve economic efficiency, its success hinges on addressing the existing challenges and implementing necessary modifications. A robust institutional framework, proactive labour management, enhanced transparency, and strategic focus are crucial for making disinvestment a truly fruit-bearing exercise. The government must adopt a pragmatic and flexible approach, adapting to changing market conditions and prioritizing long-term value creation over short-term revenue targets. A well-executed disinvestment policy can contribute significantly to India’s economic growth and fiscal consolidation.

Answer Length

This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.

Additional Resources

Key Definitions

Strategic Disinvestment
The sale of a majority stake in a Public Sector Enterprise (PSE) to a private sector entity, resulting in a transfer of control and management.
DIPAM
Department of Investment and Public Asset Management, the nodal agency under the Ministry of Finance responsible for overseeing disinvestment in India.

Key Statistics

The total disinvestment receipts from 1991-92 to 2022-23 amounted to approximately ₹3.85 lakh crore (Source: DIPAM Annual Report 2022-23).

Source: DIPAM Annual Report 2022-23

In FY23, the government exceeded its disinvestment target, mobilizing ₹51,000 crore through minority stake sales and IPOs (Source: Economic Survey 2023-24).

Source: Economic Survey 2023-24

Examples

Maruti Udyog Limited

The disinvestment of Maruti Udyog Limited in 2002, where Suzuki Motor Corporation acquired a majority stake, is often cited as a successful example of strategic disinvestment, leading to improved efficiency and technological advancements.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why is disinvestment often met with resistance from trade unions?

Trade unions often oppose disinvestment due to concerns about job losses, changes in working conditions, and the potential erosion of employee benefits. They fear that private sector ownership may prioritize profit maximization over employee welfare.

Topics Covered

EconomyFinancePrivatizationPublic SectorEconomic Policy