UPSC MainsECONOMICS-PAPER-II201310 Marks150 Words
हिंदी में पढ़ें
Q3.

State the basic features of Mahalanobis model.

How to Approach

This question requires a focused answer outlining the core principles of the Mahalanobis model. The approach should be to first define the model's context – its origin in post-independence India’s planning. Then, systematically detail its key features, emphasizing its emphasis on capital goods, heavy industry, and statistical methodology. Structure the answer by outlining the model’s objectives, the two-sector model, the role of the investment criterion, and its limitations. Avoid getting bogged down in detailed mathematical formulations; focus on the conceptual understanding.

Model Answer

0 min read

Introduction

The Mahalanobis model, formulated by Professor P.C. Mahalanobis, played a pivotal role in shaping India’s Second Five-Year Plan (1956-61). Developed in response to the limitations of the Harrod-Domar model, which focused solely on capital accumulation, the Mahalanobis model aimed to address the specific socio-economic conditions of India. It was a departure from the earlier emphasis on agriculture and consumer goods, advocating for a rapid expansion of heavy industries and capital goods production to achieve self-sustained economic growth. This model represented a conscious effort to build a strong industrial base for the nation.

Key Features of the Mahalanobis Model

The Mahalanobis model is a two-sector economic planning model designed to determine the optimal allocation of investment between capital goods (Sector I) and consumer goods (Sector II). Its core features are:

1. Two-Sector Model

The model divides the economy into two broad sectors:

  • Sector I: Capital Goods Sector – This sector produces machinery, equipment, and other inputs used for further production.
  • Sector II: Consumer Goods Sector – This sector produces goods for direct consumption by the population.

The model analyzes the interdependence between these two sectors and aims to determine the optimal investment ratio between them.

2. Objective: Maximizing National Income

The primary objective of the model is to maximize the long-run growth rate of national income. This is achieved by determining the optimal level of investment in each sector, considering their respective capital-output ratios and savings rates.

3. Investment Criterion & The Critical Minimum Investment

The model introduces the concept of a ‘critical minimum investment’ in the capital goods sector. This refers to the minimum level of investment required to generate sufficient capital accumulation and drive future growth. The investment criterion is based on the idea that a higher proportion of investment in capital goods will lead to a higher rate of future growth, but only up to a certain point. Beyond that point, diminishing returns set in.

4. Role of Savings and Capital-Output Ratio

The model heavily relies on the savings rate and the capital-output ratio (COR) of each sector. The COR indicates the amount of capital required to produce one unit of output. A lower COR implies higher efficiency. The model assumes that the capital goods sector has a lower COR than the consumer goods sector, justifying a higher investment allocation to the former.

5. Statistical Methodology – Input-Output Analysis

Mahalanobis pioneered the use of statistical techniques, particularly input-output analysis, to estimate the inter-sectoral relationships and the CORs. This was a significant advancement in economic planning, moving beyond simple aggregate models. The first Input-Output table for India was constructed under his guidance.

6. Emphasis on Heavy Industry

The model strongly advocated for prioritizing the development of heavy industries like steel, machinery, and power generation. This was based on the belief that these industries are crucial for building a self-reliant and industrialized economy. The Second Five-Year Plan reflected this emphasis, allocating a significant portion of investment to these sectors.

Limitations of the Model

  • Data Constraints: The model’s accuracy depended heavily on the availability of reliable data, which was limited in post-independence India.
  • Demand Constraints: The model largely ignored demand-side factors and assumed that sufficient demand would exist for the increased output of capital goods.
  • Technological Changes: The model did not adequately account for technological advancements and their impact on the CORs.
  • Implementation Challenges: The ambitious targets set under the Second Five-Year Plan faced implementation challenges, leading to some deviations from the model’s projections.

Conclusion

The Mahalanobis model was a landmark achievement in Indian economic planning, providing a sophisticated framework for resource allocation and industrial development. While it faced limitations in its implementation and assumptions, it laid the foundation for India’s industrial base and contributed significantly to the country’s economic growth during the Second Five-Year Plan. Its emphasis on statistical planning and heavy industry continues to influence economic policy debates in India even today.

Answer Length

This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.

Additional Resources

Key Definitions

Capital-Output Ratio (COR)
The Capital-Output Ratio (COR) is an economic measure that indicates the amount of capital required to produce one unit of output. A lower COR signifies higher efficiency in production.
Input-Output Analysis
Input-Output Analysis is a quantitative economic technique that shows the interdependence between different sectors of an economy. It traces the flow of goods and services between industries, revealing how changes in one sector affect others.

Key Statistics

The Second Five-Year Plan (1956-61) allocated approximately 59% of total investment to the capital goods sector, reflecting the influence of the Mahalanobis model.

Source: Planning Commission, Government of India (Knowledge cutoff: 2023)

India’s industrial growth rate during the Second Five-Year Plan (1956-61) was approximately 8.9%, significantly higher than the growth rate during the First Five-Year Plan.

Source: National Sample Survey Office (NSSO), Government of India (Knowledge cutoff: 2023)

Examples

Bhilai Steel Plant

The establishment of the Bhilai Steel Plant in 1959, with Soviet assistance, was a direct outcome of the Second Five-Year Plan’s focus on developing heavy industries, as advocated by the Mahalanobis model. It aimed to increase steel production capacity, a crucial input for industrial growth.

Frequently Asked Questions

Was the Mahalanobis model entirely successful?

While the model contributed to significant industrial growth, it wasn't without its shortcomings. The emphasis on heavy industry led to some imbalances in the economy, and the model underestimated the importance of agricultural development and consumer demand.

Topics Covered

EconomyHistoryEconomic PlanningIndustrial PolicyEconomic Models