UPSC MainsGENERAL-STUDIES-PAPER-III201310 Marks200 Words
Q4.

Food Security Bill is expected to eliminate hunger and malnutrition in India. Critically discuss various apprehensions in its effective implementation along with the concerns it has generated in WTO.

How to Approach

This question requires a critical assessment of the National Food Security Act (NFSA), 2013. The answer should begin by briefly outlining the objectives of the NFSA and its potential to address hunger and malnutrition. Then, it should delve into the challenges hindering its effective implementation – logistical, financial, and administrative. Finally, it needs to address the concerns raised by the NFSA within the World Trade Organization (WTO), particularly regarding trade-distorting subsidies. A balanced approach acknowledging both the benefits and drawbacks is crucial. Structure: Introduction, Implementation Challenges, WTO Concerns, Conclusion.

Model Answer

0 min read

Introduction

The National Food Security Act (NFSA), 2013, represents a landmark attempt by the Indian government to address the pervasive issues of hunger and malnutrition. It legally entitles approximately two-thirds of the population to a subsidized foodgrain supply, aiming to ensure access to adequate food at affordable prices. The Act builds upon previous food security initiatives like the Targeted Public Distribution System (TPDS) and seeks to enhance food availability, accessibility, and affordability. However, despite its noble intentions, the NFSA’s effective implementation has been fraught with challenges, and it has also triggered concerns within the international trade framework, specifically at the WTO.

Implementation Challenges

Several factors impede the effective implementation of the NFSA:

  • Logistical Bottlenecks: India’s Public Distribution System (PDS) suffers from inadequate storage infrastructure, leading to significant foodgrain wastage. Transportation issues, particularly in remote areas, further complicate distribution. According to a 2019 report by the Ministry of Consumer Affairs, Food and Public Distribution, approximately 5% of foodgrains are lost during storage and transportation annually.
  • Identification of Beneficiaries: Accurately identifying eligible beneficiaries remains a challenge. Exclusion errors (leaving out deserving individuals) and inclusion errors (including ineligible individuals) are common. The use of outdated census data and lack of robust verification mechanisms contribute to these errors.
  • Financial Constraints: The NFSA places a significant financial burden on the government. Subsidizing foodgrains at the mandated prices requires substantial budgetary allocations. Fluctuations in global food prices and increased procurement costs can further strain the financial resources.
  • Administrative Inefficiencies: Corruption, diversion of foodgrains, and lack of accountability within the PDS are persistent problems. Weak monitoring mechanisms and inadequate grievance redressal systems exacerbate these issues.
  • Grain Quality: Concerns regarding the quality of foodgrains distributed through the PDS have been raised. Reports of substandard grains and contamination undermine the effectiveness of the program.

WTO Concerns

The NFSA has raised concerns within the WTO, primarily related to its potential impact on global agricultural trade:

  • Peace Clause: India’s food subsidy program, as enshrined in the NFSA, exceeds the permissible limit of 10% of agricultural production as stipulated by the WTO’s Agreement on Agriculture (AoA). To address this, India has relied on a ‘Peace Clause’ which provides temporary protection from trade disputes. However, this clause is subject to periodic reviews and conditions.
  • Trade-Distorting Subsidies: The large-scale procurement of foodgrains at Minimum Support Prices (MSPs) and their subsequent distribution through the subsidized PDS are considered trade-distorting subsidies by some WTO members. These subsidies can depress global prices and disadvantage farmers in other countries.
  • Negotiations on Public Stockholding: India has been advocating for a permanent solution on public stockholding for food security purposes at the WTO. This would allow India to continue its food subsidy program without fear of trade disputes. However, negotiations have been stalled due to disagreements with other member countries, particularly the United States and Australia.

Comparative Analysis of Food Security Approaches

Country Food Security Approach Key Features
India (NFSA) Universal Targeted Public Distribution System Subsidized foodgrains to 2/3 of population; MSP for farmers.
Brazil (Fome Zero) Multi-faceted Social Programs Cash transfers, food banks, school feeding programs, and agricultural support.
United States (SNAP) Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Provides food assistance to low-income individuals and families through electronic benefit transfer cards.

Conclusion

The NFSA holds immense potential to alleviate hunger and malnutrition in India, but its success hinges on addressing the significant implementation challenges. Strengthening the PDS infrastructure, improving beneficiary identification, ensuring financial sustainability, and enhancing administrative efficiency are crucial. Simultaneously, India needs to actively engage with the WTO to secure a permanent solution on public stockholding, safeguarding its food security interests while adhering to international trade norms. A holistic approach combining domestic reforms and international negotiations is essential for realizing the full benefits of the NFSA.

Answer Length

This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.

Additional Resources

Key Definitions

Minimum Support Price (MSP)
A price fixed by the Government of India to protect the income of the farmers. It is the price at which the government purchases crops from farmers.

Key Statistics

As of 2023, over 80 crore (800 million) Indians are covered under the NFSA, making it one of the largest food security programs in the world.

Source: Press Information Bureau, Government of India (as of knowledge cutoff)

According to the Global Hunger Index 2022, India ranked 107 out of 121 countries, highlighting the persistent challenges related to food security and malnutrition.

Source: Global Hunger Index (2022)

Examples

Chhattisgarh’s PDS Model

Chhattisgarh has been lauded for its efficient PDS, characterized by computerized distribution, robust monitoring, and reduced diversion of foodgrains. This model serves as a best practice for other states.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the difference between TPDS and NFSA?

The Targeted Public Distribution System (TPDS) was a previous scheme focusing on identifying and providing subsidized foodgrains to specific vulnerable groups. The NFSA is a legal entitlement, expanding coverage to a larger proportion of the population and making food security a legal right.

Topics Covered

EconomySocial IssuesInternational RelationsFood SecurityPovertyWTOAgriculture