Model Answer
0 min readIntroduction
René Descartes, a pivotal figure in modern philosophy, sought to establish a firm foundation for knowledge in an era of skepticism. His method of doubt, articulated primarily in *Meditations on First Philosophy* (1641), aimed to systematically dismantle all beliefs that could be doubted, leaving only those that were absolutely certain. This radical skepticism wasn’t an end in itself, but a tool to arrive at indubitable truths. The question then arises: can this very method, designed to strip away assumptions, ultimately justify Descartes’ belief in the existence of God, a belief central to his philosophical system?
Descartes’ Method of Doubt
Descartes’ method of doubt proceeds in stages. Initially, he employs what he calls ‘hyperbolic doubt’ – a deliberate and systematic questioning of all beliefs, even those seemingly self-evident. He doubts the reliability of sensory experience, arguing that senses can be deceptive. He then questions the existence of the external world, positing the possibility of an ‘evil demon’ deceiving him into believing in a reality that doesn’t exist.
The *Cogito* and the First Principle
However, amidst this radical doubt, Descartes discovers one undeniable truth: “Cogito, ergo sum” – “I think, therefore I am.” The very act of doubting proves the existence of a thinking self. This becomes his first principle, a foundation upon which he attempts to rebuild knowledge. He argues that the ‘I’ that thinks must be a substance, distinct from the body, which is extended in space and subject to mechanical laws. This establishes a dualism between mind and body.
The Ontological Argument for God’s Existence
Having established his own existence, Descartes moves to prove the existence of God. He presents an ontological argument, based on the concept of perfection. He argues that the idea of a perfect being necessarily includes existence, as a being lacking existence would be imperfect. Therefore, God, by definition, must exist. Furthermore, Descartes argues that a perfect God would not deceive, and thus, the clear and distinct perceptions we have (including mathematical truths) are guaranteed by God’s veracity.
Can the Method Justify Belief in God? A Critical Assessment
The connection between the method of doubt and the belief in God is complex. Some argue that the method *requires* God. Without a benevolent God guaranteeing the reliability of reason, the entire project of seeking certain knowledge collapses. The *cogito* itself could be an illusion created by the evil demon. However, this reliance on God is precisely where the method faces criticism.
Criticisms of Descartes’ Argument
- The Leap from Idea to Existence: Critics like David Hume argue that one cannot logically deduce existence from the concept of perfection. Just because we can conceive of a perfect being doesn’t mean such a being actually exists.
- Circular Reasoning: The argument relies on the reliability of reason to prove God’s existence, but then uses God’s existence to guarantee the reliability of reason. This is seen as a circular argument.
- The Evil Demon Hypothesis: The initial premise of the evil demon, while intended to be a radical doubt, is itself an assumption. There’s no empirical evidence for such a being.
Therefore, while Descartes attempts to use the method of doubt to arrive at a certain foundation for knowledge, including the existence of God, the argument is vulnerable to significant philosophical challenges. The method, while powerful in its initial skeptical thrust, ultimately relies on assumptions that are not themselves immune to doubt.
Conclusion
Descartes’ method of doubt was a revolutionary attempt to overcome skepticism and establish a secure basis for knowledge. While it successfully identified the certainty of the thinking self, its justification for belief in God remains contentious. The ontological argument, central to Descartes’ system, is plagued by logical difficulties and relies on assumptions that undermine the very skeptical foundation it seeks to build upon. Ultimately, the method of doubt, while insightful, doesn’t conclusively prove the existence of God, but rather highlights the inherent challenges in bridging the gap between subjective experience and objective reality.
Answer Length
This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.