Model Answer
0 min readIntroduction
The Public Distribution System (PDS) in India, a cornerstone of food security, has undergone significant transformations over the years. Recognizing the inefficiencies and leakages in the universal PDS, the Targeted Public Distribution System (TPDS) was introduced. TPDS aims to provide subsidized food grains to Below Poverty Line (BPL) families and vulnerable sections of the population. The National Food Security Act (NFSA), 2013, further strengthened TPDS, mandating food grain allocation and defining eligibility criteria. However, concerns regarding corruption and lack of transparency have necessitated various reforms to ensure effective and equitable distribution.
What is Targeted Public Distribution System (TPDS)?
The Targeted Public Distribution System (TPDS) is a revised version of the PDS, implemented in phases across India. It aims to identify and provide food grains at subsidized rates only to families below the poverty line and those identified as vulnerable. The system is designed to be more efficient and reduce the burden on the exchequer by targeting beneficiaries more effectively.
Evolution of TPDS
The TPDS has evolved through several phases:
- Initial Phase (1997-98): Pilot projects were launched in a few states to test the feasibility of targeting.
- Full-Scale Implementation (2000 onwards): TPDS was rolled out across the country, with variations in implementation across states.
- NFSA Integration (2013): The National Food Security Act (NFSA) 2013 provided a legal framework for TPDS, defining entitlement and obligations.
Measures to Increase Transparency in TPDS
Several measures have been taken to enhance transparency and accountability in the functioning of TPDS, aiming to reduce leakages and ensure effective delivery of food grains to the intended beneficiaries. These can be broadly categorized into technological interventions and procedural reforms.
Technological Interventions
- Aadhaar Enabled Public Distribution System (AEPS): Linking ration cards to Aadhaar numbers aims to authenticate beneficiaries and prevent multiple claims. This uses biometric authentication at Fair Price Shops (FPS).
- Electronic Point of Sale (e-PoS): e-PoS machines at FPS record the sale of food grains, creating a digital trail of transactions. This helps track distribution and identify discrepancies.
- Grain Bank/Stock Management System: Real-time tracking of food grain stock at various levels – from procurement centers to FPS – improves inventory management and reduces pilferage.
- Online Grievance Redressal System: Beneficiaries can lodge complaints online regarding issues like non-availability of food grains or unfair practices.
- Public Grievance Portal: A national portal for citizens to register grievances related to food and public distribution.
Procedural Reforms
- Master List of BPL Families: State governments are responsible for preparing and maintaining a master list of BPL families, though its accuracy remains a challenge.
- Self-Help Groups (SHGs): In some states, SHGs are involved in the distribution process, promoting community participation and accountability.
- Social Audit: Independent audits are conducted to assess the performance of FPS and identify areas for improvement. The Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) has provisions for social audits which are sometimes applied to TPDS.
- Vigilance Committees: These committees, often comprising local residents and representatives, monitor the functioning of FPS and report irregularities.
- End-to-End Computerization: The government is pushing for complete computerization of TPDS, from procurement to distribution, to enhance transparency and efficiency.
Challenges and Limitations
Despite these efforts, several challenges persist:
- Data Inaccuracies: The accuracy of BPL lists remains a major concern, leading to exclusion of eligible beneficiaries and inclusion of ineligible ones.
- Corruption and Leakages: Diversion of food grains remains a problem, despite technological interventions.
- Infrastructure Deficiencies: Inadequate storage facilities and transportation infrastructure contribute to food grain losses.
- Awareness Gap: Lack of awareness among beneficiaries about their entitlements and grievance redressal mechanisms hinders the effectiveness of TPDS.
| Measure | Description | Impact |
|---|---|---|
| e-PoS | Electronic Point of Sale machines at FPS | Improved tracking of distribution, reduced leakages |
| Aadhaar Linking | Linking ration cards to Aadhaar | Prevents multiple claims, authenticates beneficiaries |
| Social Audit | Independent audits of FPS | Identifies areas for improvement, promotes accountability |
Conclusion
The TPDS represents a significant effort to improve food security in India, but achieving its objectives requires continuous refinement. While technological interventions like e-PoS and Aadhaar integration have enhanced transparency, challenges related to data accuracy and corruption persist. Strengthening the grievance redressal mechanisms, ensuring regular social audits, and promoting greater community participation are crucial for making TPDS more inclusive and effective. The focus should now be on leveraging technology to improve targeting and build trust between the government and beneficiaries.
Answer Length
This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.