UPSC MainsGENERAL-STUDIES-PAPER-III201512 Marks200 Words
हिंदी में पढ़ें
Q3.

In view of the declining average size of land holdings in India which has made agriculture non-viable for a majority of farmers, should contract farming and land leasing be promoted in agriculture? Critically evaluate the pros and cons.

How to Approach

The question requires a balanced discussion on the promotion of contract farming and land leasing in light of declining land holding sizes in India. The answer should begin by establishing the problem of fragmented land holdings and its impact on agricultural viability. Then, it should critically evaluate the pros and cons of contract farming and land leasing, considering economic, social, and legal aspects. Finally, a nuanced conclusion suggesting a way forward is expected. Structure the answer into Introduction, Body (pros & cons of each), and Conclusion. Include relevant schemes and data.

Model Answer

0 min read

Introduction

India’s agricultural landscape is characterized by rapidly declining average land holding sizes. According to the Agricultural Census 2015-16, the average land holding size has shrunk to 1.08 hectares, and 86.2% of farms are marginal (less than 2 hectares). This fragmentation renders agriculture economically non-viable for a majority of farmers, hindering productivity and income. In this context, promoting alternative arrangements like contract farming and land leasing are often suggested as solutions. However, these approaches are not without their challenges and require careful consideration to ensure equitable outcomes and sustainable agricultural development.

Contract Farming: Pros and Cons

Contract farming involves agreements between farmers and buyers for the production and supply of agricultural products.

  • Pros:
    • Assured Market & Price: Provides farmers with a guaranteed market and pre-agreed prices, reducing price volatility and market risks.
    • Access to Technology & Inputs: Often includes provision of seeds, fertilizers, and technical assistance by the buyer, improving productivity.
    • Investment & Credit: Buyers may provide credit or investment for production, easing financial burdens on farmers.
    • Infrastructure Development: Can incentivize investment in post-harvest infrastructure like storage and processing facilities.
  • Cons:
    • Exploitation & Power Imbalance: Farmers, particularly small and marginal ones, may be vulnerable to exploitation due to unequal bargaining power.
    • Price Manipulation: Buyers can potentially manipulate prices or quality standards to their advantage.
    • Land Tenure Issues: Contract farming can sometimes lead to de facto loss of land control for farmers.
    • Lack of Legal Framework: Absence of a robust legal framework can lead to disputes and inadequate redressal mechanisms. The Model Contract Farming Act, 2018, aims to address this, but its adoption is uneven across states.

Land Leasing: Pros and Cons

Land leasing involves renting out land to another party for agricultural purposes.

  • Pros:
    • Increased Land Use Efficiency: Allows land to be cultivated even by those who do not own it, increasing overall agricultural output.
    • Economies of Scale: Enables larger, more efficient farms, leading to higher productivity.
    • Income Generation for Landowners: Provides landowners with a rental income without actively engaging in farming.
    • Employment Opportunities: Creates employment opportunities for landless laborers.
  • Cons:
    • Security of Tenure: Tenants often lack security of tenure, making them hesitant to invest in land improvement.
    • Social Implications: Can exacerbate existing social inequalities and lead to displacement of small farmers.
    • Legal Restrictions: Many states had restrictive land leasing laws (e.g., prohibiting leasing out of agricultural land) which hindered its widespread adoption. Recent amendments in states like Haryana and Uttar Pradesh have relaxed these restrictions.
    • Exploitation of Tenants: Landowners may exploit tenants by charging exorbitant rents or imposing unfair conditions.

Comparative Analysis

Feature Contract Farming Land Leasing
Risk Sharing Shared between farmer & buyer Primarily borne by the tenant
Investment Often by the buyer Primarily by the tenant
Control Buyer has significant control over production Landowner retains ownership, tenant manages operations
Legal Framework Model Act (2018), state-level variations State-level Land Reforms Acts, recent amendments

Both contract farming and land leasing can contribute to agricultural development, but their success depends on creating a supportive legal and institutional environment that protects the interests of all stakeholders, particularly small and marginal farmers. Strengthening farmer producer organizations (FPOs) can empower farmers to negotiate better terms in contract farming agreements.

Conclusion

Declining land holding sizes necessitate innovative approaches to enhance agricultural viability. While contract farming and land leasing offer potential solutions, their promotion must be accompanied by robust legal frameworks, effective dispute resolution mechanisms, and measures to prevent exploitation. A balanced approach that prioritizes farmer empowerment, secure land tenure, and equitable benefit-sharing is crucial for ensuring sustainable and inclusive agricultural growth in India. Further, promoting diversification and value addition in agriculture alongside these arrangements can enhance farmer incomes and resilience.

Answer Length

This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.

Additional Resources

Key Definitions

Land Fragmentation
The division of land holdings into smaller and smaller parcels, often due to inheritance laws, leading to inefficiencies in cultivation and reduced productivity.
Model Contract Farming Act
A model law drafted by the NITI Aayog in 2018 to provide a legal framework for contract farming, aiming to protect the interests of both farmers and buyers.

Key Statistics

As per the NSSO 70th round (2013), the average monthly income of an agricultural household was ₹6,426.

Source: National Sample Survey Office (NSSO)

According to the Land Records Modernization Programme (LRP), approximately 90% of land records in India are now digitized (as of 2023).

Source: Department of Land Resources, Government of India (Knowledge cutoff: 2023)

Examples

Mahindra Agri Solutions

Mahindra Agri Solutions is a prominent player in contract farming, linking farmers to markets and providing inputs and technology for various crops.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the role of Farmer Producer Organizations (FPOs) in contract farming?

FPOs can collectively bargain with buyers, ensuring better prices and terms for their members, and reducing the power imbalance in contract farming agreements.

Topics Covered

EconomyAgricultureLand ReformsAgricultural PolicyLand OwnershipFarm Economics