Model Answer
0 min readIntroduction
Mary Parker Follett (1868-1933) was a pioneering American social worker, political scientist, and management consultant. Her work, particularly ‘Dynamic Administration’ (1927), challenged traditional hierarchical management styles and advocated for a more participatory and collaborative approach. Follett believed that administration should be a process of ‘integrating’ differing viewpoints to achieve collective goals, rather than imposing authority. The statement posits that Follett’s focus was not on abstract ideological conflicts, but on the tangible power imbalances between workers and capitalists. This necessitates a critical examination of her theories to determine the extent to which this assertion holds true.
Follett’s Core Ideas: Dynamic Administration
Follett’s ‘dynamic administration’ is rooted in the concept of continuous adjustment and adaptation. She rejected the notion of administration as a fixed set of rules and procedures, arguing that it should be a fluid process responsive to changing circumstances. Key tenets include:
- Integration, not Compromise: Follett differentiated between compromise (where each party gives up something) and integration (where a new solution is found that satisfies everyone’s needs).
- The Law of the Situation: Decisions should be based on the specific context of the situation, rather than pre-determined rules or authority.
- Reciprocal Relationships: Emphasis on the interconnectedness of individuals and groups within an organization. Authority should be derived from expertise and willingness to serve, not from position.
- Circular vs. Hierarchical Relationships: Follett advocated for a more circular organizational structure where communication flows freely between all levels, rather than a rigid hierarchy.
Analyzing the Statement: Structural vs. Ideological Conflicts
The statement suggests Follett’s work was primarily directed towards resolving structural conflicts between workers and capitalists. This has a degree of validity. Follett was deeply concerned with the social and economic inequalities of her time, and her ideas were influenced by the labor movements and socialist thought. She believed that industrial conflict stemmed from the inherent power imbalance between employers and employees. Her emphasis on collective bargaining, worker participation in management, and the need for fair labor practices directly addressed these structural issues.
However, to claim that her work *only* focused on these structural conflicts is an oversimplification. Follett’s concept of integration extends beyond merely resolving disputes between opposing groups. It encompasses the resolution of conflicting *ideas* and perspectives. She argued that creative solutions emerge from the open exchange of diverse viewpoints, even if those viewpoints are fundamentally different. For example, her work on coordinating committees within the war effort during World War I (as documented in ‘Creative Experience’, 1924) demonstrates her ability to facilitate collaboration between individuals with vastly different backgrounds and ideologies to achieve a common goal.
Evidence Supporting the Structural Conflict Focus
Several aspects of Follett’s work support the claim that she prioritized structural conflicts:
- Emphasis on Collective Bargaining: Follett was a strong advocate for collective bargaining as a means of resolving labor disputes and ensuring fair treatment for workers.
- Worker Participation in Management: She believed that workers should have a voice in decisions that affect their work, challenging the traditional top-down management approach.
- Critique of Scientific Management: Follett criticized Frederick Taylor’s scientific management for its dehumanizing approach and its focus on efficiency at the expense of worker well-being.
Evidence Supporting the Broader Conflict Resolution Focus
Conversely, Follett’s work also demonstrates a broader concern with resolving conflicts of ideas:
- The Concept of ‘Creative Experience’: Follett argued that conflict is not necessarily destructive; it can be a catalyst for creativity and innovation if managed effectively.
- Emphasis on Understanding Opposing Viewpoints: She stressed the importance of actively listening to and understanding the perspectives of others, even those with whom one disagrees.
- Application to Political Science: Follett applied her ideas to political science, arguing for a more participatory and democratic form of government.
A Nuanced Evaluation
Ultimately, Follett’s work was not exclusively directed towards resolving structural conflicts, but it was significantly *shaped* by them. The context of her time – marked by intense labor unrest and social inequality – undoubtedly influenced her thinking. However, her principles of integration, reciprocal relationships, and the law of the situation are applicable to a wide range of conflicts, both structural and ideological. She provided a framework for constructive engagement and collaborative problem-solving that transcends specific power dynamics. Her work can be seen as a precursor to modern conflict resolution techniques and organizational development practices.
Conclusion
In conclusion, while the statement accurately identifies the strong influence of structural conflicts (particularly between workers and capitalists) on Follett’s work, it is an incomplete assessment. Her ideas of dynamic administration were broader, offering a framework for resolving all types of conflicts through integration and collaborative problem-solving. Follett’s legacy lies in her pioneering vision of a more participatory, democratic, and humanistic approach to administration, relevant even in contemporary organizational and political contexts.
Answer Length
This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.