Model Answer
0 min readIntroduction
The terms ‘Tribe’ and ‘Scheduled Tribe’ are often used interchangeably, but they represent distinct concepts. Anthropologically, a ‘tribe’ refers to a social division comprising clans based on kinship, often characterized by a shared culture, language, and territory. However, the Indian Constitution recognizes specific tribes as ‘Scheduled Tribes’ (STs), conferring upon them certain safeguards and affirmative action benefits. This constitutional categorization is a legal and political construct aimed at addressing historical injustices and promoting socio-economic development. The recognition of STs stems from Article 366(25) of the Constitution, and their enumeration is a dynamic process, reflecting evolving socio-political realities.
Understanding ‘Tribe’ – An Anthropological Perspective
From an anthropological standpoint, a tribe is a complex social group, typically united by factors like common descent, language, culture, and territory. Tribes often possess a distinct political organization, though it may not always be formalized. They are generally smaller than nations and exhibit a strong sense of collective identity. Anthropological studies emphasize the diversity of tribal societies globally, highlighting their unique adaptations to specific environments and their rich cultural heritage. The concept of ‘tribe’ is fluid and can vary significantly across different regions and historical periods.
‘Scheduled Tribe’ – A Constitutional Category
The term ‘Scheduled Tribe’ is a legal designation defined in Article 366(25) of the Indian Constitution. It refers to communities that are deemed ‘primitive’ in their way of life, geographically isolated, and socially and educationally backward. The President of India, through a notification under Article 342 of the Constitution, declares which communities shall be deemed to be Scheduled Tribes in relation to a particular state or union territory. This process is based on recommendations from the state governments.
Key Differences: A Comparative Analysis
The distinction between ‘tribe’ and ‘Scheduled Tribe’ is crucial. Not all tribes are Scheduled Tribes, and the constitutional recognition carries significant legal and socio-economic implications. The following table summarizes the key differences:
| Feature | Tribe | Scheduled Tribe |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Anthropological; based on kinship, culture, and territory. | Constitutional; based on specific criteria of primitiveness, isolation, and backwardness. |
| Recognition | Recognized by anthropologists and social scientists. | Recognized by the President of India under Article 342. |
| Legal Status | No specific legal status unless specifically recognized as ST. | Entitled to specific constitutional safeguards and affirmative action benefits. |
| Criteria | Varies based on anthropological studies. | Defined by Article 366(25) of the Constitution. |
| Scope | Global; applicable to various indigenous groups worldwide. | Specific to the Indian context. |
Constitutional Safeguards for Scheduled Tribes
The Indian Constitution provides several safeguards for Scheduled Tribes, including:
- Article 15(4): Allows the state to make special provisions for the advancement of socially and educationally backward classes, including STs.
- Article 16(4): Enables the state to reserve posts in public services for STs.
- Article 19(5): Allows restrictions on the right to reside and settle in any part of India for the protection of STs.
- Article 244(1): Provides for the administration of Scheduled Areas and Scheduled Tribes.
- Fifth and Sixth Schedules: Deal with the administration of Scheduled Areas and Tribes in specific states.
Furthermore, the Provisions of the Panchayets (Extension to the Scheduled Areas) Act, 1996 (PESA) empowers Gram Sabhas in Scheduled Areas to self-govern and protect their traditional rights.
Challenges and Contemporary Issues
Despite constitutional safeguards, Scheduled Tribes continue to face significant challenges, including land alienation, displacement due to development projects, lack of access to education and healthcare, and social discrimination. The process of identifying and including communities as STs is often contentious, leading to demands for inclusion and exclusion from various groups. The Forest Rights Act, 2006, aims to address historical injustices related to forest land rights, but its implementation remains uneven.
Conclusion
In conclusion, while ‘tribe’ is an anthropological concept denoting a social grouping, ‘Scheduled Tribe’ is a constitutional category with specific legal implications. The constitutional recognition of STs is a crucial step towards addressing historical injustices and promoting their socio-economic development. However, effective implementation of constitutional safeguards and addressing contemporary challenges remain vital for ensuring the well-being and empowerment of these communities. A nuanced understanding of both terms is essential for formulating effective policies and promoting inclusive growth.
Answer Length
This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.