Model Answer
0 min readIntroduction
Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, a 17th-century German philosopher, is renowned for his optimistic metaphysics, most notably his doctrine of pre-established harmony. This doctrine posits that God, in creating the universe, ordained that all monads (simple, indivisible substances) would unfold their inherent programs in perfect synchronicity, without any causal interaction between them. This raises a fundamental question: if all events are predetermined by God’s initial decree and the internal nature of monads, is there any genuine place for freedom within Leibniz’s philosophical system? This essay will explore the apparent tension between pre-established harmony and freedom, examining Leibniz’s understanding of agency and the internal dynamics of monads.
Understanding Pre-Established Harmony
Leibniz’s metaphysics centers around the concept of the ‘monad’. Monads are fundamental, indivisible units of reality, each possessing a unique perspective and internal ‘force’ or ‘appetition’. They are windowless – meaning they have no direct interaction with each other. The apparent harmony we observe in the world isn’t due to causal interaction, but rather to God’s pre-ordained arrangement. God, being perfect, chose the best of all possible worlds, one where the monads’ internal programs align to create a coherent and harmonious universe. This is the ‘pre-established harmony’.
The Challenge to Freedom
At first glance, pre-established harmony seems to negate freedom. If every monad’s actions are predetermined by its internal nature and God’s initial decree, then there appears to be no room for genuine choice or alternative possibilities. This aligns with a deterministic worldview, where every event is causally necessitated by prior events. Traditional libertarian free will, which requires the ability to do otherwise, seems incompatible with this system. If my actions are simply the unfolding of my monad’s pre-programmed appetitions, can I truly be said to be free?
Leibniz’s Conception of Freedom
However, Leibniz doesn’t entirely abandon the notion of freedom. He distinguishes between ‘arbitrary’ freedom and ‘rational’ freedom. Arbitrary freedom, the ability to choose randomly, is considered undesirable. Rational freedom, on the other hand, is the ability to act in accordance with one’s own nature and understanding. For Leibniz, a monad is free to the extent that it acts according to its own internal principles. This isn’t freedom *from* determination, but freedom *through* determination.
Active Force and Internal Operations
Crucially, Leibniz argues that monads are not merely passive recipients of God’s decree. They possess ‘active force’ – an inherent striving or tendency towards perfection. This active force drives the monad’s internal operations, its perceptions and appetitions. While these operations are determined by the monad’s nature, they are not simply imposed from the outside. The monad actively unfolds its potential, and this internal activity can be considered a form of freedom.
Analogy of the Clocks
Leibniz uses the analogy of clocks to illustrate pre-established harmony. Imagine two perfectly synchronized clocks. They appear to influence each other, but in reality, they were both set to the same time by a master clockmaker (God). Similarly, monads appear to interact, but their harmony is due to their pre-established alignment, not causal interaction. The clocks are ‘free’ in the sense that they function according to their internal mechanisms, even though their timing is predetermined.
Addressing the Objection
The objection remains that this ‘freedom’ is merely a subjective experience, an illusion of agency. However, Leibniz argues that this subjective experience is valuable and essential. Our sense of agency is a reflection of the monad’s internal activity, its striving towards perfection. To deny this experience would be to deny a fundamental aspect of reality.
Conclusion
In conclusion, while Leibniz’s doctrine of pre-established harmony initially appears to preclude freedom, a closer examination reveals a more nuanced picture. Leibniz doesn’t advocate for libertarian free will, but rather for a form of rational freedom that is compatible with determinism. Monads are free to act according to their own internal nature and active force, even though their actions are ultimately predetermined by God’s initial decree. This conception of freedom, though distinct from traditional notions, allows for agency and responsibility within a divinely ordained universe. The question of whether this constitutes ‘true’ freedom remains a matter of philosophical debate.
Answer Length
This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.