UPSC MainsECONOMICS-PAPER-II201910 Marks150 Words
हिंदी में पढ़ें
Q19.

Differentiate between plan and non-plan expenditure as used in the government budget. Is this distinction relevant for government finances in India today?

How to Approach

This question requires a clear understanding of the historical classification of government expenditure in India – Plan and Non-Plan. The answer should begin by defining both categories, highlighting their differences, and then critically assess their relevance in the current budgetary framework, particularly after the abolition of the Planning Commission and the adoption of the NITI Aayog. Focus should be on the shift towards scheme-based funding and the increased emphasis on outcome-based budgeting. A concise and structured response is key.

Model Answer

0 min read

Introduction

The Indian government budget traditionally categorized expenditure into ‘Plan’ and ‘Non-Plan’ heads. This classification, inherited from the era of centralized planning, aimed to distinguish between investments in public sector projects (Plan) and expenditures necessary for maintaining government operations (Non-Plan). However, with the dissolution of the Planning Commission in 2014 and its replacement by NITI Aayog, the very foundation of this distinction has been challenged. This answer will delineate the differences between Plan and Non-Plan expenditure and evaluate its continued relevance in contemporary Indian government finances.

Plan Expenditure

Plan expenditure referred to the outlay for the Five-Year Plans, encompassing investments in various sectors like agriculture, industry, energy, social services, and transport. It was further categorized into:

  • Central Plan: Expenditure financed by the Union Government.
  • State Plan: Expenditure financed by State Governments.
  • Centrally Sponsored Schemes: Schemes funded jointly by the Centre and States.

The primary objective of Plan expenditure was to stimulate economic growth and development through capital formation.

Non-Plan Expenditure

Non-Plan expenditure covered all other government expenditures not included in the Five-Year Plans. This included:

  • Revenue Expenditure: Expenses incurred on day-to-day running of government departments, interest payments, subsidies, and pensions.
  • Capital Expenditure: Investments in fixed assets like roads, buildings, and machinery, excluding those part of the Five-Year Plans.

Non-Plan expenditure was largely focused on maintaining existing infrastructure and providing essential services.

Key Differences: A Comparative Table

Feature Plan Expenditure Non-Plan Expenditure
Nature Developmental & Investment-oriented Maintenance & Operational
Focus Long-term economic growth Short-term needs & existing services
Planning Integrated with Five-Year Plans Not directly linked to planning
Examples Irrigation projects, Power plants Salaries, Pensions, Subsidies

Relevance in Today’s Context

The distinction between Plan and Non-Plan expenditure has largely become irrelevant since 2017-18. The abolition of the Planning Commission and the shift to a scheme-based allocation system have fundamentally altered the budgetary process.

  • Scheme-Based Allocation: The government now allocates funds directly to specific schemes, irrespective of whether they were previously categorized as Plan or Non-Plan.
  • Focus on Outcome-Based Budgeting: The emphasis has shifted from merely allocating funds to achieving measurable outcomes. This requires a more holistic approach to expenditure management.
  • Increased Fiscal Decentralization: Greater devolution of funds to states, as recommended by the 14th and 15th Finance Commissions, has further blurred the lines between Plan and Non-Plan expenditure at the state level.
  • Capital Expenditure Push: The government is now prioritizing capital expenditure across all sectors to boost economic growth, irrespective of previous classifications. For example, the PM Gati Shakti National Master Plan (launched in 2021) focuses on integrated infrastructure development.

While the terminology is no longer officially used, understanding the historical context of Plan and Non-Plan expenditure is crucial for comprehending the evolution of India’s budgetary system. The current system, though more flexible, still reflects the underlying principles of prioritizing development and ensuring efficient resource allocation.

Conclusion

The traditional distinction between Plan and Non-Plan expenditure, once a cornerstone of India’s budgetary framework, has lost its relevance in the post-Planning Commission era. The shift towards scheme-based funding, outcome-based budgeting, and increased fiscal decentralization has rendered the old classification obsolete. However, the underlying principles of prioritizing development and efficient resource allocation remain central to government finances in India today, albeit within a more dynamic and flexible system.

Answer Length

This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.

Additional Resources

Key Definitions

Revenue Expenditure
Expenditure incurred by the government for day-to-day running of its programs and services. It does not create assets for the government.
Capital Expenditure
Expenditure incurred by the government on assets that will provide benefits over a long period, such as infrastructure projects.

Key Statistics

In the Union Budget 2023-24, the capital expenditure was increased by 33% to ₹10 lakh crore, signifying a shift towards investment-led growth.

Source: Union Budget 2023-24

As per the Economic Survey 2022-23, the share of capital expenditure in total expenditure has increased from 10.6% in 2019-20 to 14.3% in 2022-23.

Source: Economic Survey 2022-23

Examples

MGNREGA

The Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) was previously categorized under Non-Plan expenditure as it was a recurring expenditure aimed at providing social security. Now, it is funded through specific scheme allocations.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why was the Planning Commission abolished?

The Planning Commission was criticized for being overly bureaucratic, lacking dynamism, and failing to adapt to the changing economic landscape. NITI Aayog was established to provide a more flexible and responsive policy framework.

Topics Covered

EconomyGovernancePublic FinanceBudgetingEconomic Policy