UPSC MainsECONOMICS-PAPER-II201920 Marks
हिंदी में पढ़ें
Q9.

Tenancy & Revenue Reforms Post-Independence

The progress in the implementation of tenancy and revenue reforms during the first three decades after independence in India was not satisfactory." Do you agree with this view? Do you think that the advent of the Green Revolution made such land reforms policy redundant ?

How to Approach

This question requires a nuanced understanding of land reforms in post-independence India and the impact of the Green Revolution. The answer should begin by outlining the objectives of tenancy and revenue reforms, then critically assess their implementation, highlighting the reasons for their limited success. Subsequently, it needs to analyze whether the Green Revolution rendered these reforms redundant, considering both the positive and negative consequences. A balanced conclusion acknowledging the complexities is crucial. Structure: Introduction, Implementation of Reforms (Tenancy & Revenue), Reasons for Unsatisfactory Progress, Green Revolution & Land Reforms, Conclusion.

Model Answer

0 min read

Introduction

Post-independence India inherited a highly unequal agrarian structure characterized by a prevalence of tenancy, fragmented holdings, and exploitative revenue systems. Land reforms were envisioned as a crucial component of the nation’s development strategy, aiming to abolish intermediaries, secure tenancy rights, and redistribute land to the landless. These reforms were intended to address social injustice, enhance agricultural productivity, and promote rural prosperity. However, the progress in implementing these reforms during the first three decades (1947-1977) was widely considered unsatisfactory, prompting debate on whether the subsequent Green Revolution effectively bypassed the need for further land reform.

Implementation of Tenancy and Revenue Reforms

The initial focus of land reforms was on three main areas:

  • Abolition of Intermediaries (Zamindari System): This involved removing intermediaries like Zamindars, Jagirdars, and Inamdars who stood between the state and the actual tillers of the land. Significant progress was made in this area, with approximately 20.35 million acres of land abolished by 1956 (Source: All India Rural Credit Survey, 1954).
  • Tenancy Reforms: These aimed to regulate rent, provide security of tenure to tenants, and ultimately confer ownership rights upon them. Legislation varied across states, with some states like Uttar Pradesh enacting significant reforms, while others lagged behind.
  • Revenue Reforms: This included consolidation of holdings, revision of land revenue assessments, and the introduction of alternative revenue systems. Consolidation aimed to address the problem of fragmented landholdings, hindering efficient cultivation.

Reasons for Unsatisfactory Progress

Despite the initial enthusiasm, the implementation of land reforms faced numerous challenges:

  • Lack of Political Will: Powerful landlords often exerted significant political influence, hindering the effective implementation of reforms that threatened their interests.
  • Loopholes in Legislation: Many laws contained loopholes that allowed landlords to circumvent the reforms. For example, provisions for ‘benami’ transfers were frequently exploited.
  • Weak Implementation Machinery: The administrative machinery responsible for implementing the reforms was often inadequate, lacking sufficient resources and personnel.
  • Litigation: Landlords frequently challenged the reforms in courts, leading to prolonged legal battles and delays. The 6th Amendment to the Constitution (1956) was partly a response to court rulings against some land reform laws.
  • Social Barriers: Deep-rooted social hierarchies and caste-based inequalities hampered the equitable distribution of land.

The Green Revolution and Land Reforms

The Green Revolution, initiated in the mid-1960s, introduced high-yielding varieties (HYVs) of wheat and rice, along with increased use of fertilizers and irrigation. This led to a significant increase in agricultural production, particularly in states like Punjab, Haryana, and Western Uttar Pradesh.

The argument that the Green Revolution rendered land reforms redundant rests on the following points:

  • Increased Productivity: The Green Revolution demonstrated that increased agricultural productivity could be achieved even without radical land redistribution.
  • Benefits to Large Farmers: The HYVs and associated technologies were initially adopted primarily by large and medium farmers who had the resources to invest in them. This led to increased income for these farmers, reducing the immediate pressure for land redistribution.
  • Shift in Focus: The focus of agricultural policy shifted towards providing inputs and infrastructure for the Green Revolution, diverting attention from land reforms.

However, this view is not without its critics. The Green Revolution also had several negative consequences:

  • Regional Disparities: The benefits of the Green Revolution were concentrated in a few regions, exacerbating regional inequalities.
  • Increased Inequality: While large farmers benefited, small and marginal farmers were often left behind, leading to increased income inequality.
  • Environmental Concerns: The intensive use of fertilizers and pesticides led to environmental degradation, including soil erosion and water pollution.
  • Continued Landlessness: The Green Revolution did not address the fundamental issue of landlessness, and many agricultural laborers remained vulnerable to exploitation.

Furthermore, the absence of secure land tenure continued to hinder investment in land improvement and sustainable agricultural practices, even in Green Revolution areas. The lack of tenancy reforms meant that tenants were reluctant to invest in long-term improvements on land they did not own.

Feature Land Reforms Green Revolution
Primary Goal Social Justice & Equitable Distribution Increased Agricultural Production
Beneficiaries Landless & Small Farmers (intended) Large & Medium Farmers (initially)
Impact on Inequality Aimed to reduce inequality Potentially exacerbated inequality
Long-Term Sustainability Promoted sustainable land use (potential) Raised environmental concerns

Conclusion

In conclusion, while the implementation of tenancy and revenue reforms in the first three decades after independence was undeniably unsatisfactory due to political, legal, and administrative hurdles, it is inaccurate to claim that the Green Revolution rendered them entirely redundant. The Green Revolution addressed the issue of agricultural productivity but failed to tackle the underlying structural inequalities in land ownership. A more holistic approach, combining technological advancements with comprehensive land reforms, was – and remains – essential for achieving inclusive and sustainable agricultural development in India. The continued relevance of land reforms is evident in ongoing efforts to update land records and address land disputes.

Answer Length

This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.

Additional Resources

Key Definitions

Zamindari System
A land tenure system prevalent in British India where land was held by intermediaries (Zamindars) who collected revenue from peasants on behalf of the government.
Consolidation of Holdings
The process of combining fragmented landholdings into larger, more manageable units to improve agricultural efficiency.

Key Statistics

According to the National Sample Survey Organisation (NSSO) 59th Round (2003), around 60% of rural households in India were agricultural households.

Source: NSSO Report No. 510, 2003

As of 2011, marginal and small farmers (owning less than 2 hectares) constituted over 85% of all farmer households in India.

Source: Agricultural Census, 2011

Examples

Operation Barga (West Bengal)

Launched in 1978, Operation Barga aimed to record the names of sharecroppers (bargadars) and provide them with legal protection. It was relatively successful in securing tenancy rights for a significant number of sharecroppers in West Bengal.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why did tenancy reforms fail to achieve their objectives in many states?

Tenancy reforms often failed due to loopholes in legislation, lack of effective implementation, and the reluctance of landlords to relinquish control over their land. Furthermore, the fear of losing benefits under existing schemes discouraged tenants from registering as such.

Topics Covered

EconomyAgricultureHistoryLand Revenue SystemGreen RevolutionRural Development