UPSC MainsANTHROPOLOGY-PAPER-II202110 Marks150 Words
हिंदी में पढ़ें
Q18.

Concept of tribe and Indian census

How to Approach

This question requires a nuanced understanding of the anthropological concept of ‘tribe’ and its operationalization within the Indian census. The answer should begin by defining ‘tribe’ from an anthropological perspective, highlighting its dynamic nature. Then, it should detail how the Indian census categorizes tribes, including the constitutional provisions and changes in classification over time. Focus on the criteria used, the challenges faced, and the implications of census data for tribal welfare. A structured approach – definition, constitutional framework, census methodology, challenges, and implications – will be effective.

Model Answer

0 min read

Introduction

The term ‘tribe’ is a complex one, historically used to denote groups perceived as distinct in terms of culture, language, and social organization, often existing outside the mainstream state system. Anthropologically, a tribe is a form of social organization based on kinship and common ancestry, often characterized by shared territory, language, and cultural practices. However, the Indian state’s engagement with ‘tribes’ – officially designated as ‘Scheduled Tribes’ (STs) – is largely a product of colonial and post-colonial administrative and political necessities. The Indian census plays a crucial role in identifying, enumerating, and categorizing these communities, impacting policy formulation and resource allocation.

Understanding the Concept of Tribe

Anthropologically, the concept of ‘tribe’ is fluid and contested. Early evolutionary theories viewed tribes as ‘primitive’ stages of social development. Modern anthropology rejects this, recognizing tribes as dynamic social formations adapting to changing socio-economic and political contexts. Key characteristics often include:

  • Shared Culture: Common language, religion, customs, and traditions.
  • Territoriality: Association with a specific geographical area.
  • Endogamy: Preference for marriage within the group.
  • Kinship-based Social Organization: Strong emphasis on family and clan ties.
  • Self-Governance: Traditional systems of decision-making and dispute resolution.

Constitutional Framework and Scheduled Tribes

The Indian Constitution recognizes tribes as ‘Scheduled Tribes’ (Article 366(25)). This classification is crucial for affirmative action policies, including reservations in education, employment, and political representation. The initial list of Scheduled Tribes was notified in 1950 under the Constitution (Scheduled Tribes) Order, 1950. This list is subject to modification by Parliament through constitutional amendment.

Article 342 empowers the President to specify tribes as Scheduled Tribes in any state or union territory. The criteria for inclusion are not explicitly defined in the Constitution, leading to ongoing debates and demands for inclusion/exclusion.

The Indian Census and Tribal Classification

The Census of India has been instrumental in identifying and enumerating STs. The process involves:

  • Identification by State Governments: State governments propose communities to be included in the ST list based on anthropological and ethnographic evidence.
  • Review by the Tribal Affairs Ministry: The Ministry of Tribal Affairs examines the proposals, often consulting with the Anthropological Survey of India (ASI).
  • Notification by the President: The final decision rests with the President, based on the recommendations of the Ministry and ASI.

The census collects data on ST population, literacy rates, work participation rates, and other socio-economic indicators. This data is vital for assessing the development status of tribal communities.

Challenges in Census Enumeration and Classification

Several challenges complicate the process of identifying and enumerating STs:

  • Lack of Clear Criteria: The absence of a universally accepted definition of ‘tribe’ and the lack of explicit criteria for inclusion in the ST list lead to inconsistencies and disputes.
  • Political Considerations: Demands for inclusion/exclusion are often driven by political factors, rather than purely anthropological considerations.
  • Dynamic Nature of Tribal Identities: Tribal identities are not static; they evolve over time due to factors like migration, intermarriage, and cultural assimilation.
  • Under-enumeration: Remote and inaccessible tribal areas often face challenges in census enumeration, leading to undercounting.
  • Sub-categorization: The debate around sub-categorization within STs to ensure equitable distribution of benefits remains unresolved.

Implications of Census Data

Census data on STs has significant implications for:

  • Policy Formulation: Data informs the design and implementation of welfare programs targeted at tribal communities.
  • Resource Allocation: Census figures are used to determine the allocation of funds for tribal development.
  • Political Representation: ST population data is used to delineate constituencies reserved for ST candidates.
  • Monitoring and Evaluation: Census data provides a baseline for monitoring the progress of tribal development initiatives.

Conclusion

The Indian census’s categorization of tribes, while crucial for affirmative action, is a complex process fraught with anthropological, political, and logistical challenges. A more nuanced and dynamic approach, incorporating anthropological expertise and addressing the evolving nature of tribal identities, is needed. Moving forward, a clear articulation of inclusion criteria, coupled with robust enumeration methods and consideration for sub-categorization, will be essential to ensure that census data accurately reflects the realities of tribal communities and effectively informs policies aimed at their upliftment.

Answer Length

This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.

Additional Resources

Key Definitions

Scheduled Tribes (STs)
Communities officially recognized in the Constitution of India as deserving special consideration. They are identified based on distinct cultural and geographical characteristics and are eligible for certain affirmative action benefits.
Pardhan System
A traditional system of governance prevalent among the Gond tribe, where a Pardhan (village headman) is elected by a council of elders and is responsible for maintaining law and order and resolving disputes.

Key Statistics

As per the 2011 Census, the Scheduled Tribe population in India is 104.2 million, constituting 8.2% of the total population.

Source: Census of India, 2011

According to the National Family Health Survey-5 (2019-21), the Infant Mortality Rate (IMR) among Scheduled Tribes is higher than the national average.

Source: National Family Health Survey-5 (2019-21)

Examples

The Gond Tribe

The Gond tribe, one of the largest tribal groups in India, is primarily found in Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Chhattisgarh, and Andhra Pradesh. They have a distinct socio-cultural identity, traditional governance systems (like the Pardhan system), and a rich artistic heritage.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the difference between a ‘tribe’ and a ‘Scheduled Tribe’?

A ‘tribe’ is a broader anthropological category referring to groups with shared cultural and social characteristics. A ‘Scheduled Tribe’ is a specific administrative and constitutional category recognized by the Indian state for the purpose of affirmative action.

Topics Covered

AnthropologyIndian PolityStatisticsTribal StudiesCensus DataSocial Classification