UPSC MainsHISTORY-PAPER-II202120 Marks
हिंदी में पढ़ें
Q13.

Discuss the changing nature of Dalit assertion in India in the twentieth century.

How to Approach

This question requires a historical understanding of Dalit movements and their evolution throughout the 20th century. The answer should be structured chronologically, highlighting key phases of assertion – from the early reform movements to the post-independence political mobilization and contemporary struggles. Focus on the changing goals, strategies, and leadership within these movements. Mention key figures, constitutional provisions, and socio-political contexts. A nuanced understanding of both successes and limitations is crucial.

Model Answer

0 min read

Introduction

The term ‘Dalit’, meaning ‘oppressed’ or ‘broken’, gained prominence in the 20th century to denote the communities formerly known as ‘untouchables’ within the Hindu caste system. Throughout the century, Dalit assertion underwent a significant transformation, evolving from a focus on religious reform and individual upliftment to a broader struggle for socio-political rights and self-respect. This journey was marked by diverse ideologies, ranging from Gandhian approaches to radical movements inspired by Ambedkar and Periyar, reflecting the complex and multifaceted nature of Dalit experiences in India. The 20th century witnessed Dalits moving from being passive recipients of charity to active agents of social and political change.

Early Phase: Reform and Religious Conversion (Early 20th Century - 1930s)

The initial phase of Dalit assertion was largely characterized by reform movements aimed at challenging the rigidities of the caste system and seeking social equality. Key features included:

  • Satyashodhak Samaj (1873): Founded by Jyotirao Phule, it challenged Brahmanical dominance and advocated for education and social justice for lower castes.
  • Sri Narayana Guru Dharma Paripalana Yogam (1903): In Kerala, Sri Narayana Guru led a movement for temple entry and social equality for Ezhavas, a marginalized community.
  • Religious Conversion: Recognizing the inherent limitations within Hinduism, some Dalits explored alternative religions. The Adi-Dharma movement in Punjab (1930s) sought to revive a pre-Hindu identity and convert to Sikhism.

These movements primarily focused on individual upliftment and challenging social discrimination, but lacked a comprehensive political agenda.

The Ambedkarite Phase: Political Mobilization and Constitutional Safeguards (1930s - 1950s)

The emergence of Dr. B.R. Ambedkar marked a turning point in Dalit assertion. Ambedkar advocated for political representation, separate electorates, and constitutional safeguards for Dalits.

  • Poona Pact (1932): A compromise between Ambedkar and Gandhi, it replaced separate electorates with reserved seats for Dalits within the general electorate. While criticized for being a concession, it provided a degree of political representation.
  • Formation of Independent Labour Party (1936): Ambedkar formed this party to represent the interests of Dalits and other marginalized groups.
  • Drafting Committee of the Constitution: Ambedkar’s role as Chairman of the Drafting Committee ensured the inclusion of provisions protecting the rights of Scheduled Castes, including Article 15 (prohibition of discrimination) and Article 16 (equality of opportunity in public employment).

This phase saw a shift from social reform to political mobilization and the demand for constitutional rights.

Post-Independence: Political Participation and Rise of Dalit Identity (1960s - 1980s)

The post-independence period witnessed increased political participation of Dalits, but also persistent socio-economic inequalities.

  • Republican Party of India (RPI): Founded in 1957 by Ambedkar, the RPI aimed to represent Dalit interests, but faced internal divisions and limited success.
  • Dalit Panther Movement (1972): Emerging in Maharashtra, the Dalit Panthers were a militant organization that challenged caste oppression and police brutality. They adopted a radical approach, drawing inspiration from the Black Panther movement in the US.
  • Rise of Kanshi Ram and the Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP): Kanshi Ram’s mobilization of the ‘Bahujan’ (majority) – comprising Dalits, OBCs, and minorities – led to the formation of the BSP in 1984. The BSP gained significant political power in Uttar Pradesh in the 1990s.

This period saw the consolidation of Dalit identity and the emergence of political parties dedicated to representing their interests. However, issues of caste-based violence and discrimination remained prevalent.

Contemporary Phase: Globalization, Affirmative Action, and New Challenges (1990s - 2000s)

The contemporary phase is characterized by the impact of globalization, the debate over affirmative action, and new forms of discrimination.

  • Mandal Commission (1979) & Implementation (1990): While primarily focused on OBCs, the implementation of the Mandal Commission recommendations indirectly benefited Dalits by increasing competition for jobs and educational opportunities.
  • Continued Caste-Based Violence: Incidents like Khairlanji (2006) and Bhima-Koregaon (2018) highlighted the persistence of caste-based violence and discrimination.
  • Debate over Reservation: The debate over reservation in education and employment continues, with arguments for its expansion and concerns about its effectiveness.
  • Emergence of New Dalit Voices: Increased access to education and media has led to the emergence of new Dalit voices challenging traditional narratives and advocating for social justice.

The contemporary phase is marked by both progress and setbacks, with Dalits continuing to face systemic discrimination and violence despite constitutional safeguards and political representation.

Phase Key Features Leaders/Organizations
Early Phase (1900-1930s) Social Reform, Religious Conversion Jyotirao Phule, Sri Narayana Guru
Ambedkarite Phase (1930s-1950s) Political Mobilization, Constitutional Safeguards Dr. B.R. Ambedkar, Independent Labour Party
Post-Independence (1960s-1980s) Political Participation, Rise of Dalit Identity RPI, Dalit Panthers, Kanshi Ram
Contemporary (1990s-Present) Globalization, Affirmative Action, New Challenges BSP, Various Dalit Activist Groups

Conclusion

The changing nature of Dalit assertion in the 20th century reflects a dynamic and evolving struggle for social justice and equality. From early reform movements to the rise of political parties and contemporary activism, Dalits have consistently challenged the structures of caste oppression. While significant progress has been made in terms of constitutional rights and political representation, systemic discrimination and violence remain persistent challenges. The future of Dalit assertion will likely involve continued efforts to address these challenges, promote inclusive development, and ensure the full realization of their rights and dignity.

Answer Length

This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.

Additional Resources

Key Definitions

Untouchability
Untouchability refers to the practice of social discrimination against people considered to be outside the caste system, historically associated with those performing ‘unclean’ occupations. It was legally abolished by Article 17 of the Indian Constitution.
Bahujan
Bahujan literally means "majority" and refers to the coalition of Shudras (Other Backward Classes), Dalits, and minorities, who together constitute a significant portion of the Indian population. The term was popularized by Kanshi Ram.

Key Statistics

According to the 2011 Census of India, the Scheduled Caste population constitutes 8.2% of the total population.

Source: Census of India, 2011

According to the National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB) data (2022), crimes against Scheduled Castes increased by 9.1% compared to 2021.

Source: NCRB, 2022 (as of knowledge cutoff)

Examples

The Una Incident (2016)

In July 2016, Dalits in Una, Gujarat, were publicly flogged by ‘Gau Rakshaks’ (cow vigilantes) for skinning a dead cow. This incident sparked widespread protests and highlighted the continuing vulnerability of Dalits to caste-based violence.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the difference between ‘Dalit’ and ‘Scheduled Caste’?

‘Scheduled Caste’ is a constitutional category used for administrative purposes, while ‘Dalit’ is a self-identified term used by many members of these communities to express their experience of oppression and marginalization. Not all members of Scheduled Castes identify as Dalit, and vice versa.

Topics Covered

HistorySocietyPoliticsDalit MovementSocial JusticeCaste System