What are the defences available to an accused in a civil suit for 'defamation'? Explain.

Defamation, a tort harming reputation, involves a false statement presented as fact that causes injury to another’s reputation. It manifests as either libel (written) or slander (spoken). A defendant in a defamation suit can invoke several defences to avoid liability. These defences aim to balance the right to free speech with the right to protect one’s reputation. Understanding these defences is crucial for navigating defamation law, which is governed by sections 499 and 500 of the Indian Penal Code and common law principles. Defences Available in a Civil Suit for Defamation Defences are broadly categorized into absolute and qualified privileges. Absolute Privilege Fair Comment on Matters of Public Interest: A genuine expression of opinion on a matter of public concern, based on true facts. Parliamentary/Judicial Proceedings: Statements made during official parliamentary or judicial proceedings are protected. Communication to Legal Authority: Reporting a crime to the police is protected. Qualified Privilege This defence applies when the statement is made in good faith, without malice, and on a subject matter where the speaker has a duty or interest to communicate. Honest Belief: The defendant honestly believed the statement to be true. Public Interest: Disclosure made in the public interest (e.g., reporting corruption). Protection of One’s Own Interest: Statements made to protect one’s own legitimate interests. Common Interest: Communication made to a person sharing a common interest. Truth is a fundamental defence, but the burden of proof lies on the defendant. Retraction , while not a complete defence, can mitigate damages. Consent from the defamed party also serves as a defence. The defence of qualified privilege can be defeated by proving malice – that the statement was made with knowledge of its falsity or with reckless disregard for the truth. ( Ramji Lal Modi v. K.K. Shukla , 1958 AIR 271) In conclusion, defences against defamation are crucial for safeguarding freedom of expression while acknowledging the importance of protecting reputation. The availability of absolute and qualified privileges, alongside defences like truth and retraction, provides a nuanced legal framework. Successfully invoking these defences requires demonstrating good faith, absence of malice, and adherence to the specific conditions outlined by law.

What is the difference between defamation and hate speech?

While both involve harmful speech, defamation focuses on damaging an individual's reputation with false statements, whereas hate speech aims to incite violence or discrimination against a group based on protected characteristics.

Defamation: Defenses Available | UPSC Mains LAW-PAPER-II 2021

Model Answer

0 min read

Introduction

Defamation, a tort harming reputation, involves a false statement presented as fact that causes injury to another’s reputation. It manifests as either libel (written) or slander (spoken). A defendant in a defamation suit can invoke several defences to avoid liability. These defences aim to balance the right to free speech with the right to protect one’s reputation. Understanding these defences is crucial for navigating defamation law, which is governed by sections 499 and 500 of the Indian Penal Code and common law principles.

Defences Available in a Civil Suit for Defamation

Defences are broadly categorized into absolute and qualified privileges.

Absolute Privilege

Fair Comment on Matters of Public Interest: A genuine expression of opinion on a matter of public concern, based on true facts.
Parliamentary/Judicial Proceedings: Statements made during official parliamentary or judicial proceedings are protected.
Communication to Legal Authority: Reporting a crime to the police is protected.

Qualified Privilege

This defence applies when the statement is made in good faith, without malice, and on a subject matter where the speaker has a duty or interest to communicate.

Honest Belief: The defendant honestly believed the statement to be true.
Public Interest: Disclosure made in the public interest (e.g., reporting corruption).
Protection of One’s Own Interest: Statements made to protect one’s own legitimate interests.
Common Interest: Communication made to a person sharing a common interest.

Truth is a fundamental defence, but the burden of proof lies on the defendant. Retraction, while not a complete defence, can mitigate damages. Consent from the defamed party also serves as a defence.

The defence of qualified privilege can be defeated by proving malice – that the statement was made with knowledge of its falsity or with reckless disregard for the truth. (Ramji Lal Modi v. K.K. Shukla, 1958 AIR 271)

Conclusion

In conclusion, defences against defamation are crucial for safeguarding freedom of expression while acknowledging the importance of protecting reputation. The availability of absolute and qualified privileges, alongside defences like truth and retraction, provides a nuanced legal framework. Successfully invoking these defences requires demonstrating good faith, absence of malice, and adherence to the specific conditions outlined by law.

Answer Length

This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.

What are the defences available to an accused in a civil suit for 'defamation'? Explain.

Model Answer

Introduction

Defences Available in a Civil Suit for Defamation

Absolute Privilege

Qualified Privilege

Conclusion

Evaluate your handwritten answer in under a minute

Additional Resources

Key Definitions

Key Statistics

Examples

Arnab Goswami Case

Subramanian Swamy vs. Tamil Nadu Government

Frequently Asked Questions

Topics Covered