Model Answer
0 min readIntroduction
Malnutrition remains a significant public health concern globally, particularly affecting children under five years of age. It encompasses deficiencies, excesses, or imbalances in the intake of energy and/or nutrients. Delayed initiation of complementary feeding and recurrent diarrheal episodes are major contributing factors to childhood malnutrition. The case presented describes a 12-month-old infant exhibiting signs suggestive of protein-energy malnutrition (PEM), requiring a thorough assessment and prompt intervention to prevent long-term developmental consequences. This answer will analyze the provided data, arrive at a diagnosis, and outline a management plan.
Assessment of the Case
The provided anthropometric data reveals several concerning findings:
- Length (72 cm): Significantly below the median for a 12-month-old, indicating stunting.
- Weight (5 kg): Well below the expected weight for age, suggesting wasting.
- Mid-Arm Circumference (10 cm): Low, indicative of muscle wasting and malnutrition.
- Loss of Subcutaneous Fat: A clear sign of depleted energy reserves.
- History: Delayed complementary feeding and recurrent diarrhea further support the diagnosis of malnutrition.
Differential Diagnosis
Based on the clinical presentation, the following diagnoses should be considered:
- Marasmus: Characterized by severe wasting, emaciation, and loss of subcutaneous fat. This is the most likely diagnosis given the child’s weight, MAC, and loss of subcutaneous fat.
- Kwashiorkor: Typically presents with edema, particularly in the feet and ankles, along with skin lesions and hair changes. While not explicitly mentioned, it cannot be entirely ruled out without a physical examination.
- Marasmic-Kwashiorkor: A mixed presentation of both marasmus and kwashiorkor.
- Other causes of failure to thrive: Consider underlying infections (e.g., tuberculosis, HIV), congenital anomalies, or malabsorption syndromes, though the history points strongly towards nutritional deficiency.
Diagnosis
Considering the clinical picture, the most probable diagnosis is severe acute malnutrition (SAM), likely Marasmus. The child meets the WHO criteria for SAM based on weight-for-height, mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC), and clinical signs.
Management Plan
Phase 1: Stabilization (Inpatient)
This phase focuses on correcting life-threatening complications:
- Hypoglycemia: Administer 10% dextrose intravenously or orally if the child is conscious.
- Hypothermia: Provide warmth through skin-to-skin contact or radiant warmer.
- Dehydration: Rehydrate cautiously with oral rehydration solution (ORS) or intravenous fluids if severe.
- Infection: Treat any underlying infections with appropriate antibiotics.
- Electrolyte Imbalance: Correct any electrolyte imbalances (e.g., potassium, sodium).
- Dietary Management: Start with F-75 therapeutic milk (low protein, high carbohydrate) in small, frequent feeds, gradually increasing the volume.
Phase 2: Rehabilitation (Inpatient/Outpatient)
Once stabilized, the focus shifts to nutritional rehabilitation:
- F-100 Therapeutic Food: Transition to F-100 therapeutic food (high protein, high energy) to promote weight gain.
- Micronutrient Supplementation: Provide vitamin A, iron, zinc, and folic acid.
- Sensory Stimulation: Encourage interaction and play to promote cognitive development.
- Monitoring: Regularly monitor weight, MUAC, and clinical signs.
Phase 3: Follow-up (Outpatient)
After discharge, continued monitoring and support are crucial:
- Nutritional Counseling: Educate the mother on appropriate complementary feeding practices, hygiene, and infection prevention.
- Growth Monitoring: Regularly monitor the child’s growth at a health facility.
- Food Security: Address any underlying food insecurity issues.
Prognosis
The prognosis depends on the severity of malnutrition, the presence of complications, and the adherence to the management plan. Early diagnosis and prompt intervention significantly improve the chances of a full recovery. However, long-term developmental delays are possible, highlighting the importance of comprehensive follow-up care.
Conclusion
This case exemplifies the devastating consequences of delayed complementary feeding and recurrent infections on a child’s nutritional status. A systematic approach to assessment, diagnosis, and management, encompassing stabilization, rehabilitation, and follow-up, is essential for optimizing outcomes. Preventive strategies, including promoting exclusive breastfeeding for the first six months and timely introduction of appropriate complementary foods, are crucial for reducing the burden of childhood malnutrition. Addressing underlying socio-economic factors contributing to food insecurity is also paramount.
Answer Length
This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.