Model Answer
0 min readIntroduction
Dependency theories emerged in the mid-20th century, largely as a response to modernization theory, which posited that all societies would eventually follow a linear path of development similar to that of Western nations. Scholars like Raúl Prebisch, Andre Gunder Frank, and Immanuel Wallerstein challenged this notion, arguing that the development of core nations was intrinsically linked to the underdevelopment of peripheral nations. The current global scenario, marked by increasing inequality, geopolitical tensions, and the dominance of multinational corporations, provides a fertile ground to critically examine the enduring contribution of these theories in understanding the dynamics of the world system.
Historical Roots and Core Arguments
Dependency theories arose from the experiences of Latin American countries in the post-colonial era. Raúl Prebisch’s work on the terms of trade (1949) highlighted how peripheral countries exporting primary commodities faced declining prices relative to manufactured goods exported by core countries, leading to a structural imbalance. Andre Gunder Frank, in his ‘development of underdevelopment’ thesis (1966), argued that the historical relationship between core and periphery actively prevented the development of the latter. Immanuel Wallerstein’s World-Systems Theory (1974) provided a more comprehensive framework, dividing the world into core, periphery, and semi-periphery, emphasizing the interconnectedness and hierarchical nature of the global capitalist system.
Contemporary Applications of Dependency Theories
Global Supply Chains and Exploitation
Dependency theories offer a powerful lens through which to analyze contemporary global supply chains. Multinational corporations (MNCs) often locate production in peripheral countries with low labor costs and weak regulations, extracting surplus value and contributing to the exploitation of workers. The Rana Plaza collapse in Bangladesh (2013), which killed over 1,100 garment workers, exemplifies this dynamic. The pursuit of cheaper production costs by Western brands directly contributed to unsafe working conditions and ultimately, tragedy.
Debt Crises and Structural Adjustment Programs
The debt crises of the 1980s and 1990s in Latin America and Africa, and more recently in countries like Greece and Argentina, can be understood through a dependency framework. Loans from international financial institutions (IFIs) like the IMF and World Bank often came with stringent structural adjustment programs (SAPs) that forced countries to privatize state-owned enterprises, liberalize trade, and cut social spending. These policies, while intended to promote economic growth, often exacerbated inequality and hindered long-term development, reinforcing the dependency relationship.
Resource Extraction and Neo-Colonialism
The extraction of natural resources from peripheral countries by core countries and MNCs continues to be a major feature of the global economy. The Democratic Republic of Congo, rich in minerals like cobalt (essential for electric vehicle batteries), exemplifies this dynamic. Despite its vast mineral wealth, the DRC remains one of the poorest countries in the world, with much of the benefit from resource extraction accruing to foreign companies and elites. This situation reflects a form of neo-colonialism, where economic dominance replaces direct political control.
Critiques and Limitations of Dependency Theories
Ignoring Internal Factors
A major criticism of dependency theories is that they tend to overemphasize external factors and neglect the role of internal dynamics, such as political corruption, poor governance, and lack of investment in education and infrastructure. The ‘East Asian Miracle’ – the rapid economic growth of countries like South Korea, Taiwan, and Singapore – demonstrates that countries can overcome dependency and achieve development through strategic state intervention and investment in human capital.
The Rise of New Actors and Globalisation
The rise of new economic powers like China and India, and the increasing complexity of globalization, have challenged the simple core-periphery model. China, for example, is both a beneficiary of the global capitalist system and a major investor in peripheral countries, blurring the lines between core and periphery. The emergence of global value chains has also created new opportunities for peripheral countries to participate in the global economy.
Lack of Empirical Support for Some Claims
Some of the more radical claims of dependency theorists, such as the assertion that development and underdevelopment are mutually constitutive, have been difficult to empirically verify. While dependency theories provide a valuable framework for understanding global inequalities, they are not a complete explanation of the complex dynamics of development.
Conclusion
Dependency theories, despite their limitations, remain a crucial framework for understanding the persistent inequalities and power imbalances that characterize the global scenario. While the world has become more complex since their inception, the core insights regarding the structural constraints faced by peripheral nations remain relevant. Addressing global challenges like climate change, poverty, and inequality requires a critical understanding of the historical and ongoing dynamics of dependency, and a commitment to building a more just and equitable global order. Moving forward, a nuanced approach that integrates insights from dependency theory with other perspectives, such as those offered by post-colonial studies and ecological economics, is essential.
Answer Length
This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.