UPSC MainsHISTORY-PAPER-II202210 Marks150 Words
हिंदी में पढ़ें
Q1.

The Battle of Plassey (1757) was a skirmish while the Battle of Buxar (1764) was a real war.

How to Approach

This question requires a comparative analysis of the Battles of Plassey and Buxar. The approach should be to first define what constitutes a 'skirmish' versus a 'real war', then analyze each battle in that context, focusing on factors like troop strength, strategic importance, and long-term consequences. The answer should highlight how Buxar decisively established British power while Plassey was more of a fortuitous beginning. A chronological structure is best suited.

Model Answer

0 min read

Introduction

The British East India Company’s rise to power in India was punctuated by several key battles. While the Battle of Plassey (1757) is often considered the foundational moment of British rule, its significance is debated. The Battle of Buxar (1764), fought seven years later, is often contrasted with Plassey, with many historians arguing it was a far more decisive engagement. This contrast stems from the scale, the opponents involved, and the ultimate consequences for the political landscape of India. The assertion that Plassey was a ‘skirmish’ and Buxar a ‘real war’ requires a nuanced examination of both conflicts.

The Battle of Plassey (1757): A Fortuitous Victory

The Battle of Plassey was fought between the British East India Company, led by Robert Clive, and Siraj-ud-Daulah, the Nawab of Bengal. The battle was largely won due to Clive’s strategic alliances with disgruntled members of Siraj-ud-Daulah’s court, most notably Mir Jafar.

  • Troop Strength: The British force comprised approximately 3,000 soldiers, including sepoys, against Siraj-ud-Daulah’s army of around 50,000.
  • Key Factors: The battle was characterized by treachery and limited fighting. Mir Jafar’s deliberate inaction and the defection of a significant portion of the Nawab’s army were crucial to the British victory.
  • Consequences: Plassey granted the British control over Bengal, a wealthy province. However, it didn’t immediately translate into complete political dominance. The Company had to share power with puppet rulers like Mir Jafar.

The Battle of Buxar (1764): Establishing British Supremacy

The Battle of Buxar was a much more significant conflict, fought between the British East India Company, led by Hector Munro, and a combined army of Mir Qasim (Nawab of Bengal), Shuja-ud-Daulah (Nawab of Awadh), and Shah Alam II (Mughal Emperor). This represented a broad coalition against British expansion.

  • Troop Strength: The British force numbered around 7,000, facing a combined enemy force estimated at over 60,000.
  • Key Factors: Unlike Plassey, Buxar was a hard-fought battle with significant casualties on both sides. The British displayed superior discipline, training, and artillery. The combined forces lacked coordination and were decisively defeated.
  • Consequences: Buxar cemented British control over Bengal, Awadh, and effectively diminished Mughal authority. The Treaty of Allahabad (1765) granted the British the Diwani rights (right to collect revenue) of Bengal, Bihar, and Orissa, providing them with immense financial resources. This marked a turning point, transforming the Company from a trading entity into a territorial power.

Comparative Analysis

Feature Battle of Plassey (1757) Battle of Buxar (1764)
Opponents Robert Clive vs. Siraj-ud-Daulah Hector Munro vs. Mir Qasim, Shuja-ud-Daulah, Shah Alam II
Troop Strength (Approx.) 3,000 (British) vs. 50,000 (Nawab) 7,000 (British) vs. 60,000+ (Combined Forces)
Key Factor Treachery, Defection of Mir Jafar British Discipline, Superior Artillery, Lack of Coordination among opponents
Outcome British control over Bengal, but shared power British dominance over Bengal, Awadh, and diminished Mughal power; Diwani rights secured
Nature of Conflict More of a coup/skirmish A full-scale war

Therefore, the initial assessment holds true. Plassey was largely a result of conspiracy and a relatively minor military engagement. Buxar, on the other hand, was a substantial military confrontation that decisively established British power and laid the foundation for their future expansion across India.

Conclusion

In conclusion, while the Battle of Plassey initiated British influence in India, it was the Battle of Buxar that truly demonstrated their military superiority and political ambition. Plassey was a fortunate incident, capitalizing on internal divisions, whereas Buxar was a testament to British military prowess and strategic planning. Buxar’s outcome fundamentally altered the power dynamics in India, paving the way for the eventual establishment of British colonial rule.

Answer Length

This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.

Additional Resources

Key Definitions

Diwani Rights
The Diwani rights refer to the right to collect land revenue and administer justice. It was granted to the British East India Company by the Mughal Emperor Shah Alam II in 1765 through the Treaty of Allahabad.
Sepoy
A Sepoy was an Indian soldier serving under the British East India Company. They formed a significant part of the Company’s army and were crucial to their military successes.

Key Statistics

Bengal’s revenue contributed approximately 40% of the East India Company’s total revenue by the late 18th century.

Source: Bayly, C.M. (1990). Indian Society and the Making of the British Empire.

The British East India Company’s army grew from approximately 67,000 in 1760 to over 200,000 by the early 19th century, largely due to the revenue generated from Bengal.

Source: Keay, J. (1991). The Honourable Company: A History of the British East India Company.

Examples

Mir Jafar’s Role

Mir Jafar, the commander of the Nawab’s army, secretly colluded with Robert Clive and agreed to betray Siraj-ud-Daulah in exchange for being installed as the new Nawab of Bengal. This exemplifies the role of internal dissent in the British victory at Plassey.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why was the Treaty of Allahabad so important?

The Treaty of Allahabad (1765) was crucial because it granted the British the Diwani rights of Bengal, Bihar, and Orissa. This provided the Company with the financial resources to maintain a large army and expand its political influence, effectively making them the dominant power in eastern India.

Topics Covered

HistoryColonialismBritish RuleEarly ColonialismMilitary History