UPSC MainsECONOMICS-PAPER-II202310 Marks150 Words
हिंदी में पढ़ें
Q16.

Examine the salient features of the Action Plan for Disinvestment, 2009.

How to Approach

This question requires a focused answer outlining the key features of the Disinvestment Action Plan of 2009. The answer should begin by briefly contextualizing disinvestment policy in India, then detail the specific features of the 2009 plan – targets, approach to sectors, methods of disinvestment, and institutional mechanisms. A structured approach, perhaps using bullet points or subheadings, will enhance clarity. Focus on what differentiated this plan from previous ones.

Model Answer

0 min read

Introduction

Disinvestment, or the sale of equity stakes in Public Sector Enterprises (PSEs) by the government, has been a cornerstone of India’s economic reforms since 1991. The Action Plan for Disinvestment, 2009, formulated in the aftermath of the global financial crisis, aimed to bolster government revenues, improve PSE efficiency, and broaden capital markets. This plan represented a renewed push towards disinvestment, building upon earlier attempts and adapting to the evolving economic landscape. It sought to achieve these objectives through a strategic and phased approach, focusing on specific sectors and employing diverse methods of stake sale.

Salient Features of the Action Plan for Disinvestment, 2009

The Action Plan for Disinvestment, 2009, outlined a comprehensive strategy for reducing government ownership in PSEs. Key features included:

1. Disinvestment Targets and Revenue Generation

  • The plan aimed to raise approximately ₹1.1 lakh crore (as per knowledge cutoff 2024, this figure is significantly lower in real terms due to inflation) through disinvestment over the remaining period of the Eleventh Five Year Plan (2007-2012).
  • It proposed to disinvest in a minimum of 5-10 PSEs each year.
  • The revenue generated was intended to fund social sector schemes and reduce the fiscal deficit.

2. Sectoral Focus

  • The plan prioritized disinvestment in sectors where the government considered its presence non-essential, such as hotels, airlines, and certain manufacturing units.
  • Strategic sectors like oil & gas, power, and banking were to be approached with caution, focusing on offloading minority stakes to ensure continued government control.
  • Emphasis was placed on disinvestment in ‘Navratna’ and ‘Miniratna’ companies – those with greater autonomy and financial performance.

3. Methods of Disinvestment

  • Initial Public Offerings (IPOs): Listing previously unlisted PSEs on stock exchanges.
  • Follow-on Public Offerings (FPOs): Selling additional shares of already listed PSEs.
  • Strategic Sale: Transferring control of a PSE to a private sector buyer. This method was used selectively, particularly for loss-making or inefficient units.
  • Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs): Creating ETFs comprising shares of various PSEs to offer diversified investment opportunities. CPSE ETF was launched in 2014, building on this concept.

4. Institutional Mechanisms

  • Department of Disinvestment (DoD): The DoD, under the Ministry of Finance, was the nodal agency responsible for implementing the disinvestment program.
  • Cabinet Committee on Disinvestment (CCD): The CCD, headed by the Prime Minister, provided overall guidance and approval for major disinvestment decisions.
  • Advisors and Merchant Bankers: The DoD appointed legal and financial advisors to assist in the disinvestment process, including valuation, due diligence, and marketing of shares.

5. Addressing Concerns & Improving Efficiency

  • The plan emphasized the need to address labor concerns and provide social safety nets for employees affected by disinvestment.
  • It also aimed to improve the corporate governance and operational efficiency of PSEs prior to disinvestment, making them more attractive to investors.

The plan also included provisions for employee stock options and reservation of shares for employees to foster a sense of ownership and participation.

Conclusion

The Action Plan for Disinvestment, 2009, represented a significant attempt to accelerate the pace of disinvestment in India. While it faced challenges in achieving its ambitious revenue targets, it laid the groundwork for subsequent disinvestment initiatives. The plan’s emphasis on diverse methods, sectoral prioritization, and institutional strengthening contributed to a more structured and transparent approach to privatization. However, factors like market conditions and political considerations often influenced the actual implementation of the plan, highlighting the complexities inherent in disinvestment policy.

Answer Length

This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.

Additional Resources

Key Definitions

PSE (Public Sector Enterprise)
A company in which the government holds a majority stake, typically involved in providing essential goods and services.
Navratna & Miniratna Companies
These are PSEs granted greater autonomy and financial powers by the government based on their performance and potential.

Key Statistics

₹1.1 lakh crore

Source: Action Plan for Disinvestment, 2009 (as per knowledge cutoff 2024, this figure is significantly lower in real terms due to inflation)

The total disinvestment receipts from 1991-92 to 2022-23 amounted to over ₹3.82 lakh crore.

Source: Department of Investment and Public Asset Management (DIPAM), Government of India (as of March 2023)

Examples

Air India Disinvestment

Although not directly under the 2009 plan, the eventual disinvestment of Air India in 2022 exemplifies the long-term goals of the disinvestment policy – reducing fiscal burden and improving efficiency through private sector participation.

Frequently Asked Questions

What were the main criticisms of the disinvestment policy?

Critics argued that disinvestment could lead to job losses, reduced access to essential services, and the transfer of valuable assets to private hands at undervalued prices. Concerns were also raised about the potential for crony capitalism and lack of transparency in the process.

Topics Covered

EconomyGovernanceDisinvestmentPublic SectorEconomic Policy