UPSC MainsPSYCHOLOGY-PAPER-II202315 Marks
हिंदी में पढ़ें
Q10.

“Intrinsic motivation in comparison to extrinsic motivation leads to enhanced performance and creativity.” Examine.

How to Approach

This question requires a comparative analysis of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation, linking them to performance and creativity within a public administration context. The answer should define both types of motivation, explain their psychological underpinnings, and then systematically examine how each impacts performance and creativity. Illustrative examples from the workplace, particularly public service, are crucial. Structure the answer by first defining the concepts, then comparing and contrasting their effects on performance, followed by their impact on creativity, and finally, a nuanced conclusion.

Model Answer

0 min read

Introduction

Motivation, the driving force behind human action, is a cornerstone of effective public administration. While often used interchangeably, intrinsic and extrinsic motivation represent fundamentally different psychological mechanisms. Intrinsic motivation stems from internal rewards – a sense of accomplishment, enjoyment, or personal growth – while extrinsic motivation arises from external factors like rewards, recognition, or fear of punishment. Recent research in behavioral economics and organizational psychology increasingly highlights the superior impact of intrinsic motivation on sustained performance and innovative thinking, particularly in complex and knowledge-based roles prevalent in modern public service. This answer will examine the assertion that intrinsic motivation, in comparison to extrinsic motivation, leads to enhanced performance and creativity.

Understanding Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation

Intrinsic Motivation: This refers to engaging in an activity for the inherent satisfaction it provides. It’s driven by interest, enjoyment, and a sense of purpose. Individuals intrinsically motivated are more likely to persist in the face of challenges and exhibit greater engagement. Deci and Ryan’s Self-Determination Theory (1985) posits that intrinsic motivation flourishes when individuals feel autonomous, competent, and connected.

Extrinsic Motivation: This involves performing an action to attain a separable outcome, such as a reward or to avoid a punishment. While effective in the short term, extrinsic motivation can diminish once the reward is removed or the threat of punishment subsides. It often focuses on task completion rather than the quality of work or innovative thinking.

Impact on Performance

While both types of motivation can drive performance, their effects differ significantly. Extrinsic motivation often leads to a focus on quantifiable metrics and short-term goals. This can be beneficial in routine tasks requiring efficiency and adherence to procedures. For example, performance-based bonuses in tax collection might increase revenue in the short run.

However, intrinsic motivation fosters a deeper level of engagement and commitment. Employees driven by intrinsic factors are more likely to go the extra mile, take ownership of their work, and demonstrate higher levels of sustained performance. A civil servant genuinely passionate about environmental conservation is likely to be more effective in implementing environmental policies than one solely motivated by promotion prospects.

Impact on Creativity

Creativity, a crucial element of effective public administration, is significantly enhanced by intrinsic motivation. Extrinsic rewards can sometimes stifle creativity by encouraging conformity and risk aversion. Individuals may focus on producing outputs that guarantee rewards rather than exploring novel solutions.

Intrinsic motivation, conversely, encourages experimentation, exploration, and a willingness to embrace failure as a learning opportunity. When individuals are genuinely interested in a problem, they are more likely to think outside the box and develop innovative solutions. The success of the ‘Hackathons’ organized by MyGov, where citizens voluntarily contribute innovative solutions to public problems, exemplifies the power of intrinsic motivation in fostering creativity.

Comparing and Contrasting: A Table

Feature Intrinsic Motivation Extrinsic Motivation
Source Internal (interest, enjoyment) External (rewards, punishments)
Focus Process & Learning Outcome & Completion
Sustainability High – self-sustaining Low – dependent on external factors
Creativity Enhanced – encourages exploration Potentially stifled – encourages conformity
Performance Sustained, high quality Short-term, metric-driven

The Role of Public Service Values

The public service ethos, emphasizing values like integrity, accountability, and public service, inherently aligns with intrinsic motivation. Attracting and retaining individuals motivated by a desire to serve the public good is crucial for building a responsive and effective bureaucracy. Over-reliance on extrinsic rewards can erode these values and lead to a culture of compliance rather than commitment.

However, a complete dismissal of extrinsic motivation is impractical. A balanced approach, combining intrinsic motivators like opportunities for professional development and recognition of contributions with appropriate extrinsic rewards, is often the most effective strategy.

Conclusion

In conclusion, while extrinsic motivation can be a useful tool for achieving short-term goals and ensuring compliance, intrinsic motivation demonstrably leads to enhanced performance, greater creativity, and a stronger commitment to public service values. Public administration systems should prioritize fostering an environment that nurtures intrinsic motivation by empowering employees, providing opportunities for growth, and recognizing their contributions beyond mere quantifiable outputs. A shift towards intrinsic motivation is not merely a matter of improving efficiency; it is fundamental to building a public service that is truly responsive, innovative, and dedicated to the well-being of citizens.

Answer Length

This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.

Additional Resources

Key Definitions

Self-Determination Theory
A motivational theory developed by Deci and Ryan (1985) that posits that people are motivated to grow and change by three innate and universal psychological needs: autonomy, competence, and relatedness.
Flow State
A mental state in which a person performing an activity is fully immersed in a feeling of energized focus, full involvement, and enjoyment in the process of the activity. This is strongly linked to intrinsic motivation.

Key Statistics

A 2019 study by Gallup found that employees who are engaged (highly intrinsically motivated) are 21% more profitable than those who are not.

Source: Gallup, "State of the American Workplace"

Research suggests that approximately 70% of employee engagement is driven by the manager/supervisor relationship, which directly impacts opportunities for intrinsic motivation.

Source: State of the Global Workplace Report, Gallup (Knowledge cutoff: 2023)

Examples

Aravind Eye Care System

The Aravind Eye Care System in India exemplifies intrinsic motivation. Doctors and staff are driven by a commitment to providing affordable, high-quality eye care to the masses, rather than solely by financial incentives. This has led to remarkable efficiency and scale, making Aravind a global leader in eye care.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can extrinsic motivation ever be beneficial in public administration?

Yes, extrinsic motivation can be useful for tasks that are routine, require immediate compliance, or lack inherent interest. However, it should be used strategically and in conjunction with efforts to foster intrinsic motivation.

Topics Covered

Public AdministrationPsychologyOrganizational BehaviorMotivation TheoriesEmployee EngagementProductivity