UPSC MainsPUBLIC-ADMINISTRATION-PAPER-II202310 Marks150 Words
हिंदी में पढ़ें
Q5.

"Parliamentary democracy in India envisages elected head as the real executive of a State." Discuss.

How to Approach

This question requires a discussion on the nature of the executive in the Indian parliamentary system. The answer should begin by defining parliamentary democracy and the concept of an 'elected head' as the real executive. It should then elaborate on how this is manifested in the Indian context, focusing on the Prime Minister and Council of Ministers, their relationship with the President, and the constitutional provisions supporting this. Discussing the collective responsibility principle and instances where the executive has been held accountable by the Parliament will strengthen the answer. A balanced approach acknowledging the President’s role is crucial.

Model Answer

0 min read

Introduction

Parliamentary democracy, at its core, is a system of governance where the executive branch derives its legitimacy from and is accountable to the legislature. The concept of an ‘elected head’ as the real executive implies that the individual or body wielding executive power is chosen by and responsible to the elected representatives of the people. In India, the Constitution establishes a parliamentary form of government, modeled after the British system, where the Prime Minister, as the leader of the majority party in the Lok Sabha, functions as the real executive, despite the President being the constitutional head of the State. This arrangement is deeply rooted in the principles of popular sovereignty and representative governance.

The Prime Minister and the Council of Ministers: The Real Executive

Article 74 and 75 of the Constitution explicitly establish the Council of Ministers, with the Prime Minister at its head, as the real executive authority. The President acts on the advice of the Council of Ministers (Article 74(1)). This means that while the President formally possesses executive powers, their exercise is largely symbolic and guided by the elected government.

The Prime Minister is appointed by the President (Article 75) but conventionally, the President appoints the leader of the party or coalition that commands a majority in the Lok Sabha. This underscores the democratic basis of the executive’s power. The Council of Ministers is collectively responsible to the Lok Sabha (Article 75(2)). This principle of collective responsibility means that the government remains in power only as long as it enjoys the confidence of the lower house.

Constitutional Provisions Supporting the Elected Head

Several constitutional provisions reinforce the primacy of the elected head:

  • Vote of No Confidence: The Lok Sabha can remove the government through a vote of no confidence, demonstrating parliamentary control over the executive.
  • Question Hour & Parliamentary Committees: Mechanisms like Question Hour, parliamentary committees (e.g., Public Accounts Committee, Estimates Committee) hold the executive accountable for its actions and policies.
  • Financial Control: The Parliament’s control over the budget ensures that the executive cannot spend public funds without legislative approval.
  • Impeachment: While rarely invoked, the impeachment process for the President (Article 61) highlights the ultimate accountability of even the constitutional head.

The President’s Role: A Constitutional Head

While the Prime Minister and Council of Ministers constitute the real executive, the President’s role is not merely ceremonial. The President has certain discretionary powers, particularly in situations of hung parliament or when no party secures a clear majority. However, even in these cases, the President is expected to act in accordance with constitutional conventions and principles of parliamentary democracy.

Historical Examples & Case Studies

The 1996-97 period, with multiple short-lived governments, demonstrates the Lok Sabha’s power to determine the executive. Similarly, the imposition of President’s Rule under Article 356, though controversial, is ultimately subject to judicial review and parliamentary scrutiny. The S.R. Bommai v. Union of India (1994) case established limitations on the use of Article 356, reinforcing the importance of elected governments.

Feature Parliamentary System (India) Presidential System (USA)
Executive Prime Minister & Council of Ministers (collectively responsible to Parliament) President (not responsible to legislature)
Head of State President (ceremonial) President (also Head of Government)
Accountability Executive accountable to Parliament Executive not directly accountable to legislature

Conclusion

In conclusion, the Indian parliamentary democracy firmly establishes the elected head – the Prime Minister and Council of Ministers – as the real executive. This is underpinned by constitutional provisions ensuring executive accountability to the legislature, particularly the Lok Sabha. While the President remains the constitutional head, their powers are largely exercised on the advice of the elected government, reflecting the core principle of popular sovereignty. The system, though not without its challenges, effectively balances executive authority with parliamentary oversight, ensuring a responsive and accountable government.

Answer Length

This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.

Additional Resources

Key Definitions

Collective Responsibility
The principle of collective responsibility dictates that the entire Council of Ministers is collectively responsible to the Lok Sabha. This means that if a vote of no confidence is passed against the government, the entire Council must resign, not just the individual minister who may have been the subject of the censure.
Constitutional Head
The Constitutional Head is the nominal head of the state, who holds a largely ceremonial position. In India, the President is the Constitutional Head, while the real executive power is vested in the Prime Minister and the Council of Ministers.

Key Statistics

As of 2023, India has witnessed 17 Lok Sabha elections since its independence in 1947.

Source: Election Commission of India

According to PRS Legislative Research, the average tenure of a Lok Sabha between 1952 and 2019 has been approximately 5 years.

Source: PRS Legislative Research (as of knowledge cutoff)

Examples

Indira Gandhi’s Government (1966-1977)

Indira Gandhi’s government faced several motions of no confidence, demonstrating the Parliament’s ability to challenge the executive. While she successfully navigated these challenges, they highlighted the accountability mechanism inherent in the parliamentary system.

Frequently Asked Questions

What happens if the Prime Minister loses the confidence of the Lok Sabha?

If the Prime Minister loses the confidence of the Lok Sabha, the government is obligated to resign. The President then has to appoint a new Prime Minister who can command a majority in the House.

Topics Covered

PolityParliamentExecutiveConstitutionalism