UPSC MainsANTHROPOLOGY-PAPER-II202415 Marks
हिंदी में पढ़ें
Q8.

Deconstruct the colonial history of Indian Anthropology highlighting the critical role played by the Indian Anthropologists in sustaining its autonomy.

How to Approach

This question requires a nuanced understanding of the historical development of Anthropology in India, particularly its entanglement with colonial rule. The answer should trace the evolution of anthropological practices under British administration, highlighting how they were initially used for governance and control. Crucially, it must then demonstrate how Indian anthropologists actively worked to reclaim the discipline, indigenize its methodologies, and establish its autonomy. A chronological structure, focusing on key phases and figures, is recommended.

Model Answer

0 min read

Introduction

Anthropology, as a discipline, has a complex and often fraught relationship with colonialism. In India, its origins are deeply intertwined with the British colonial project, initially serving as a tool for understanding and administering a diverse population. However, the story isn’t simply one of imposition. From the late 19th century onwards, Indian scholars began to engage with and critique colonial anthropological practices, gradually asserting their own perspectives and methodologies. This process of indigenization and autonomy-seeking is central to understanding the trajectory of Indian Anthropology. This answer will deconstruct the colonial history of Indian Anthropology and highlight the critical role played by Indian anthropologists in sustaining its autonomy.

The Colonial Foundations of Indian Anthropology (18th - Early 20th Century)

The earliest forms of anthropological inquiry in India were largely driven by the needs of the East India Company. These were primarily descriptive accounts of customs, religions, and social structures, aimed at facilitating effective governance. Early efforts focused on:

  • Orientalist Scholarship: Scholars like William Jones (founded the Asiatic Society of Bengal in 1784) laid the groundwork for understanding Indian languages, literature, and history, though often through a lens of European superiority.
  • Administrative Surveys: The British conducted extensive surveys and censuses (starting with the 1871 Census) to categorize and classify Indian populations, often based on caste, religion, and occupation. These surveys, while providing valuable data, were also used to reinforce colonial hierarchies.
  • Ethnographic Studies: Early ethnographies, often written by colonial administrators or missionaries, focused on ‘primitive’ tribes and communities, frequently portraying them as static and backward.

This initial phase was characterized by a top-down approach, with limited participation from Indian scholars. The discipline was largely used to legitimize colonial rule and implement policies of social control.

The Rise of Indian Anthropologists and the Challenge to Colonial Narratives (Early - Mid 20th Century)

The early 20th century witnessed the emergence of a new generation of Indian anthropologists who began to challenge the dominant colonial narratives. Key figures and developments included:

  • S.C. Roy: Considered one of the pioneers of Indian Anthropology, Roy’s work on the Mundas of Bihar (Munda Tribe and Their Country, 1922) offered a more nuanced and empathetic understanding of tribal societies than previous colonial accounts. He advocated for tribal rights and self-governance.
  • A.V. Krishna Iyer: Iyer’s research on the Nayars of Malabar challenged the prevailing colonial stereotypes about matrilineal societies.
  • L.P. Vidyarthi: Vidyarthi emphasized the importance of understanding Indian culture from an Indian perspective, advocating for a ‘scientific’ yet culturally sensitive approach. He pioneered the concept of ‘sacred complex’ in understanding Indian villages.
  • Establishment of Anthropology Departments: The establishment of Anthropology departments in Indian universities (e.g., Calcutta University in 1921) provided a platform for Indian scholars to conduct independent research and train future generations of anthropologists.

These anthropologists actively sought to:

  • Indigenize Methodologies: They moved away from purely observational methods towards participatory research, engaging with communities and incorporating local perspectives.
  • Critique Colonial Bias: They challenged the colonial assumptions of racial superiority and cultural evolution.
  • Focus on Indian Social Structures: They shifted the focus of anthropological research towards understanding the complexities of Indian social structures, including caste, kinship, and religion.

Post-Independence Anthropology: Consolidating Autonomy and Addressing New Challenges (Mid 20th Century - Present)

After independence, Indian Anthropology underwent further transformation. The discipline became increasingly focused on addressing issues of social justice, development, and cultural change. Key trends included:

  • Emphasis on Applied Anthropology: Anthropologists began to apply their knowledge to address practical problems, such as tribal development, health, and education.
  • Study of Caste and Inequality: Research on caste continued to be a central focus, with scholars examining the persistence of caste-based discrimination and inequality.
  • Globalization and Cultural Change: More recent research has focused on the impact of globalization on Indian cultures and societies.
  • Rise of Regional Anthropology: Increased focus on specific regional cultures and communities, moving away from broad generalizations.

However, challenges remain. These include the need to address the legacy of colonial biases, ensure ethical research practices, and promote greater inclusivity within the discipline.

Comparative Table: Colonial vs. Indian Anthropology

Feature Colonial Anthropology Indian Anthropology
Purpose Governance, social control, justification of colonial rule Understanding Indian society, promoting social justice, addressing development challenges
Perspective Eurocentric, often biased and ethnocentric Indocentric, culturally sensitive, and critical of colonial biases
Methodology Primarily observational, top-down approach Participatory, incorporating local perspectives
Focus ‘Primitive’ tribes, exotic customs Complex social structures, caste, religion, cultural change

Conclusion

The history of Indian Anthropology is a testament to the resilience and intellectual agency of Indian scholars. While initially shaped by colonial interests, the discipline was gradually reclaimed and transformed by a new generation of anthropologists who sought to understand India on its own terms. The ongoing efforts to indigenize methodologies, address social inequalities, and engage with contemporary challenges demonstrate the continued commitment to sustaining the autonomy and relevance of Indian Anthropology. Future research must prioritize ethical considerations and inclusivity to ensure that the discipline continues to serve the needs of Indian society.

Answer Length

This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.

Additional Resources

Key Definitions

Orientalism
A way of seeing that imagines, emphasizes, exaggerates and distorts differences of Arab peoples and cultures (and others) as opposed to that of Europe and the West. It often involves a biased and stereotypical representation of Eastern cultures.
Participant Observation
A key anthropological research method where the researcher immerses themselves in the daily life of the community being studied, participating in their activities and observing their behavior firsthand. This contrasts with the more detached observational methods favored by early colonial anthropologists.

Key Statistics

According to the 2011 Census of India, Scheduled Tribes constitute 8.2% of the total population.

Source: Census of India, 2011

The number of Anthropology departments in Indian universities has increased significantly since independence, from a handful to over 80 as of 2023 (approximate figure based on UGC data).

Source: University Grants Commission (UGC) data (knowledge cutoff 2023)

Examples

The Andaman Island Administration

The British administration of the Andaman Islands in the late 19th and early 20th centuries involved extensive anthropological surveys of the indigenous tribes, often with the aim of controlling and assimilating them. This exemplifies the colonial use of anthropology for administrative purposes.

Frequently Asked Questions

How did the colonial census impact anthropological studies in India?

The colonial census provided a vast amount of data on Indian populations, which was used by anthropologists to study caste, religion, and other social categories. However, the census categories themselves were often based on colonial assumptions and biases, which influenced the direction of anthropological research.

Topics Covered

AnthropologyHistorySocial ScienceColonialismAcademic HistorySocial ResearchIndian Scholars