UPSC MainsANTHROPOLOGY-PAPER-II202510 Marks150 Words
हिंदी में पढ़ें
Q2.

Write short notes on the following in about 150 words each: (b) Caste domination, factionalism and political power

How to Approach

The approach will involve defining each term – caste domination, factionalism, and political power – and then elaborating on their interconnectedness in the Indian political context. It is crucial to cite M.N. Srinivas's concept of 'dominant caste' and provide contemporary examples of how these dynamics manifest in electoral politics and governance. The answer will highlight both the reinforcing and potentially divisive roles these elements play.

Model Answer

0 min read

Introduction

In India's complex socio-political landscape, caste, factionalism, and political power are intricately linked, often shaping governance, electoral outcomes, and resource distribution. The traditional hierarchical caste system, though legally abolished, continues to influence social and political structures. This interplay creates dynamic relationships where dominant caste groups leverage their numbers and resources to gain political power, often leading to internal divisions (factionalism) within parties or communities as various sub-groups vie for influence. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for comprehending the nuances of Indian democracy.

Caste Domination

Caste domination refers to the preponderant influence of a particular caste group within a specific geographical area or political sphere. M.N. Srinivas's concept of "dominant caste" (1959) is central here, characterized by:

  • Numerical Strength: A sizeable population relative to other castes in a region.
  • Economic Power: Significant control over land, business, and other economic resources.
  • Political Influence: Representation in local governance and political systems, enabling them to impact policies and decision-making.
  • High Place in Local Hierarchy: While not always ritually the highest, they enjoy high social regard due to their economic and political clout.

Dominant castes often leverage their collective strength to secure political representation and further their interests, sometimes at the expense of other groups.

Factionalism

Factionalism is the division of a larger group, such as a political party or a caste, into smaller, often competing sub-groups or factions. These divisions typically arise from differing ideologies, personal loyalties, conflicting objectives, or competition for resources and power. In the Indian political context, factionalism can manifest:

  • Within Political Parties: Leaders and their followers forming distinct blocs vying for control over party nominations, policies, or leadership positions.
  • Within Caste Groups: Sub-castes or influential families within a dominant caste competing for regional influence or political tickets.

Factionalism can lead to internal conflicts, weaken party unity, and make governance challenging, but it can also be a mechanism for broader representation by allowing diverse interests to find expression.

Political Power

Political power is the capacity to influence, lead, dominate, or otherwise impact the life and actions of others in society, often through control over governmental institutions and policy-making. It is the ability to shape public policy, distribute resources, and enforce decisions. In India, political power is sought through democratic processes, where various social groups, including caste communities, mobilize to elect their representatives.

Interplay: Caste Domination, Factionalism, and Political Power

The relationship between these three elements is symbiotic and dynamic:

  1. Caste Domination to Political Power: Dominant castes, due to their numerical strength and economic resources, often translate social dominance into political power. They form significant vote banks, and political parties actively seek their support by nominating candidates from these castes or by tailoring policies to their interests. Examples include the Yadavs in Uttar Pradesh and Bihar, Jats in Haryana, and Lingayats/Vokkaligas in Karnataka.
  2. Factionalism within Dominant Castes: As a dominant caste gains political power, internal competition often arises. Different leaders or sub-groups within the dominant caste may form factions, each vying for greater influence, party tickets, or ministerial berths. This internal factionalism can lead to splits in parties or shifts in electoral alliances.
  3. Factionalism and Broader Political Power: Beyond dominant castes, factionalism is a pervasive feature of Indian political parties. Leaders often build personal loyalties, creating factions that can challenge existing power structures or form new political alignments. These factions can be based on caste, regional identity, or personal charisma, influencing candidate selection, party manifestos, and government formation.
  4. Impact on Governance: The quest for political power, often fueled by caste domination and factionalism, can impact governance. Decisions might be influenced by vote-bank politics, leading to policies that favor specific caste groups or appease powerful factions, potentially hindering equitable development. However, it also enables marginalized communities to assert their political agency and demand representation, thereby deepening democracy.

Conclusion

The intricate relationship between caste domination, factionalism, and political power remains a defining feature of Indian democracy. While caste provides a structured identity that influences political mobilization and access to power, factionalism acts as an internal dynamic within these groups and political parties, constantly reshaping alliances and leadership. Political power, in turn, is both a goal and a tool, allowing dominant castes and influential factions to assert their will and influence policy. This complex interplay presents both challenges in terms of social fragmentation and opportunities for the representation and empowerment of various social strata.

Answer Length

This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.

Additional Resources

Key Definitions

Dominant Caste (M.N. Srinivas)
A sociological concept introduced by M.N. Srinivas, referring to a caste group that holds preponderant numerical strength, significant economic resources (especially land), a high place in the local caste hierarchy, and considerable political influence within a specific region.
Factionalism
The division of a larger group (such as a political party, community, or caste) into smaller, often competing sub-groups or factions, usually based on differing interests, ideologies, personal loyalties, or competition for power and resources.

Key Statistics

In the 2024 Lok Sabha elections, despite narratives of declining caste-based politics, the BJP lost 9 of the 17 seats reserved for Scheduled Castes in Uttar Pradesh, with the Samajwadi Party winning 7, indicating continued caste consolidation and shifts in vote banks. (Source: Association for Democratic Reforms, 2024)

Source: Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR)

Studies suggest that the influence of caste in Indian politics has been declining in some areas since the mid-1990s, including in rural India, due to factors like the spread of education and economic liberalisation. However, caste remains a significant determinant in voting behaviour and political mobilization. (Source: Wikipedia, Caste Politics)

Source: Wikipedia (Caste Politics)

Examples

Yadav Politics in Bihar and Uttar Pradesh

The rise of parties like the Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) in Bihar and the Samajwadi Party (SP) in Uttar Pradesh exemplifies how the numerical strength and political mobilization of the Yadav community, a dominant OBC caste, translated into significant political power and chief ministerial positions for leaders like Lalu Prasad Yadav and Mulayam Singh Yadav.

Maratha Factionalism in Maharashtra

The Maratha community, a historically dominant caste in Maharashtra, often exhibits internal factionalism within major political parties like the Congress and NCP. Different Maratha leaders and their sub-factions compete for influence, ministerial berths, and control over cooperative institutions, leading to shifting alliances and power struggles within the state's political landscape.

Frequently Asked Questions

How does the reservation policy interact with caste domination and political power?

Reservation policies, intended to ensure representation for historically disadvantaged Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, and Other Backward Classes, can reinforce caste identities in politics. While they empower marginalized groups, they can also lead to competition among castes for reservation benefits and political mobilization along caste lines, further influencing political power dynamics.

Topics Covered

SociologyPolitical ScienceCastePoliticsSocial DynamicsPower Structures