UPSC MainsHISTORY-PAPER-II202520 Marks
हिंदी में पढ़ें
Q7.

"The tug of war between the two principles of freedom and control of the press made its influence felt on the colonial rulers' attitude to the press." Discuss.

How to Approach

The answer will analyze the evolving attitude of colonial rulers towards the press, fluctuating between promoting limited freedom and imposing strict control. It will trace this evolution through key legislative acts and historical events, highlighting the underlying motivations of the British. The discussion will cover periods of relative liberalism and severe repression, demonstrating how the 'tug of war' manifested and impacted the press and the nationalist movement. The answer will be structured chronologically, categorizing the various acts and their implications, supported by specific examples and their impact.

Model Answer

0 min read

Introduction

The history of the press in colonial India is largely a narrative of constant tension between the principles of freedom of expression and the imperial need for control. From the late 18th century, when the first newspapers emerged, until India's independence in 1947, the British administration grappled with how to manage a burgeoning press that often served as a voice for public opinion and nationalist aspirations. This "tug of war" profoundly shaped the colonial rulers' policies, leading to a cyclical pattern of relaxation and repression, driven by strategic considerations of maintaining authority, managing dissent, and responding to evolving political landscapes in India and globally.

The Genesis of the Press and Early Controls (Late 18th Century - Early 19th Century)

The establishment of the first newspaper, Hicky's Bengal Gazette in 1780, marked the beginning of print media in India. Initially, the British East India Company recognized the potential of the press for administrative communication and as a means to project an image of just governance. However, even early on, criticism directed at Company officials led to swift punitive action, setting a precedent for state oversight.

  • Censorship of Press Act, 1799 (Lord Wellesley): Imposed pre-censorship on newspapers, requiring submission of proofs before publication. This was largely driven by fears of French invasion and dissemination of anti-British sentiments.
  • Relaxation by Lord Hastings (1818): Pre-censorship was abolished, reflecting a brief period of more progressive views towards the press.
  • Licensing Regulations, 1823 (John Adams): Reinstated strict controls, making it illegal to operate a press without a license. This led to the cessation of publications like Raja Rammohan Roy's Mirat-ul-Akbar.

The Era of Liberalism and its Reversal (1835 - 1857)

A short-lived but significant period of press freedom emerged, only to be dramatically reversed following the Revolt of 1857.

  • Press Act of 1835 (Metcalfe Act): Sir Charles Metcalfe, earning the title "Liberator of the Indian Press," repealed the 1823 regulations, removing licensing requirements and fostering a period of rapid growth for newspapers. This was largely a pragmatic move to reduce administrative burden and gain public goodwill.
  • Licensing Act, 1857 (Gagging Act, Lord Canning): In the immediate aftermath of the 1857 Revolt, perceived to have been fueled by inflammatory publications, this Act reintroduced mandatory licensing and empowered the government to prohibit the publication or circulation of any printed matter deemed seditious. This marked a severe shift towards control.
  • Registration Act, 1867: Replaced the 1857 Act, primarily for regulatory purposes rather than outright restriction. It required newspapers to print the name of the printer, publisher, and place of publication, and submit a copy to the government.

Intensified Control and Discriminatory Policies (Post-1870s)

As the nationalist movement gained momentum, the colonial government resorted to more draconian and often discriminatory measures to curb the influence of the Indian press.

Vernacular Press Act, 1878 (Lord Lytton)

This was one of the most infamous pieces of legislation, explicitly designed to control the Indian-language press, which was increasingly critical of British policies. It was nicknamed "The Gagging Act."

  • Provisions: Empowered district magistrates to demand bonds from printers/publishers of vernacular newspapers, promising not to publish material inciting disaffection or antipathy. Security could be forfeited and press equipment seized without judicial review.
  • Discrimination: Excluded English-language publications, revealing a clear discriminatory intent to silence Indian voices.
  • Impact: Led to widespread protests and condemnation. Newspapers like Amrita Bazar Patrika famously converted to an English daily overnight to escape its provisions.
  • Repeal: Repealed by Lord Ripon in 1882, responding to mounting public pressure.

Newspaper (Incitement to Offences) Act, 1908

Enacted in response to the rise of extremist nationalist activities, particularly during the Swadeshi movement.

  • Powers: Magistrates were empowered to confiscate press property that published objectionable material likely to cause incitement to murder or acts of violence.

Indian Press Act, 1910

This Act revived and expanded upon the stringent features of the Vernacular Press Act, imposing rigorous censorship on all types of publications.

  • Key Provisions: Required printers and publishers to deposit security (Rs. 500 to Rs. 2000), which could be forfeited for publishing seditious or objectionable material. Customs and postal authorities gained powers to detain and examine suspicious printed matter. Local governments could declare forfeiture of any newspaper, book, or document.
  • Impact: Led to the prosecution of nearly 1,000 papers and suppression of revolutionary and nationalist literature, severely curtailing freedom of expression.

Wartime Censorship and Continued Repression (Early 20th Century to Independence)

The World Wars provided further justification for the colonial government to impose strict censorship, effectively expanding the 'control' aspect of the tug of war.

  • Defence of India Act, 1915: Enacted during World War I, it granted authorities stringent powers to censor the press to prevent the dissemination of information prejudicial to the war effort or public safety.
  • Repeal of 1908 and 1910 Acts (1921): Based on the recommendations of the Press Committee chaired by Tej Bahadur Sapru, these acts were repealed, offering a brief respite.
  • Indian Press (Emergency Powers) Act, 1931: Introduced in the wake of the Civil Disobedience Movement, giving provincial governments sweeping powers to suppress propaganda deemed to be undermining government authority. It was further amplified in 1932.
  • World War II Censorship: Under the Defence of India Rules, severe repression was again imposed, and amendments were made to the Press Emergency Act and Official Secrets Act, including declaring the publication of news related to Congress activity illegal.

Table: Major Press Acts in Colonial India

Year Act Name Key Features and Colonial Attitude Impact on Freedom of Press
1799 Censorship of Press Act Pre-censorship; fear of French influence. Severe restriction, limited criticism.
1823 Licensing Regulations Mandatory licensing; suppression of Indian-edited papers. Strict control, targeting Indian voices.
1835 Press Act (Metcalfe Act) Removed licensing; promoted growth of press. Brief period of relative freedom.
1857 Licensing Act (Gagging Act) Mandatory licensing; empowered government to prohibit publications; reaction to Revolt of 1857. Heavy censorship, stifled dissent.
1878 Vernacular Press Act Targeted Indian language press; empowered magistrates to seize presses; discriminatory against Indian press. Severe blow to vernacular press, intensified nationalist resistance.
1910 Indian Press Act Demanded security deposits; wide powers to forfeit publications; response to militant nationalism. Rigorous censorship, financial burden on nationalist papers.
1931 Indian Press (Emergency Powers) Act Sweeping powers to suppress Civil Disobedience propaganda. Extreme control, stifling political movements.

The Nationalist Response and the Press as a Weapon

Despite the repressive measures, the Indian press, particularly the vernacular press, became a crucial instrument for fostering nationalism and challenging colonial rule. Nationalist leaders like Raja Rammohan Roy, Bal Gangadhar Tilak, Mahatma Gandhi, and Surendranath Banerjee effectively used newspapers to:

  • Educate and mobilize public opinion against British policies.
  • Expose the economic exploitation and injustices of the Raj.
  • Spread ideas of self-rule and social reform.
  • Criticize government actions and policies, often using clever tactics to circumvent censorship.

The colonial rulers' consistent attempts to control the press underscored their recognition of its power as a tool for political mobilization and a threat to their authority. Each act of repression often led to innovative forms of resistance from Indian journalists and amplified the nationalist demand for freedom of expression.

Conclusion

The relationship between colonial rulers and the press in India was a dynamic interplay characterized by a fundamental "tug of war" between the ideals of freedom and the imperatives of imperial control. While the British occasionally allowed periods of relative press freedom, particularly when it served their administrative or image-building interests, any perceived threat to their authority, especially from the burgeoning nationalist movement, led to swift and severe repressive measures. This cyclical pattern of legislative control and Indian resistance ultimately highlighted the indomitable spirit of free expression and demonstrated the press's crucial role as a catalyst in India's struggle for independence, forcing the colonial power to constantly adapt its strategies of governance.

Answer Length

This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.

Additional Resources

Key Definitions

Vernacular Press
Refers to newspapers and periodicals published in local Indian languages, as opposed to English. The Vernacular Press played a critical role in reaching the masses and fostering nationalist sentiments during the colonial period.
Sedition (Colonial Context)
In colonial India, sedition was broadly defined by the British to include any words, spoken or written, or any signs or visible representation that brought or attempted to bring into hatred or contempt, or excited or attempted to excite disaffection towards the Government established by law in British India. This broad definition was used to suppress nationalist critiques.

Key Statistics

Under the Indian Press Act of 1910, approximately 1,000 newspapers and periodicals were prosecuted, and securities worth over 3.5 lakh rupees were confiscated between 1910 and 1914.

Source: R. Kumar, "Development of Press in India: Pre & Post Independence Era"

By 1877, there were 279 vernacular newspapers in British India, with a circulation of over 100,000 copies, demonstrating the growing reach and influence of the Indian press before the Vernacular Press Act.

Source: B.N. Pandey, "A History of Indian Journalism"

Examples

Amrita Bazar Patrika's Resistance

When the Vernacular Press Act of 1878 was enacted, specifically targeting Indian language newspapers, the Bengali newspaper 'Amrita Bazar Patrika' famously converted itself into an English newspaper overnight. This strategic move allowed it to escape the draconian provisions of the Act, which did not apply to English publications, showcasing the press's ingenuity in resisting colonial control.

Bal Gangadhar Tilak and Kesari

Bal Gangadhar Tilak, through his Marathi newspaper 'Kesari', became a powerful voice of Indian nationalism. His fiery editorials often led to sedition charges, demonstrating how the colonial administration used legal means to suppress influential nationalist journalists and control public discourse.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who was known as the "Liberator of the Indian Press" and why?

Sir Charles Metcalfe is known as the "Liberator of the Indian Press." He earned this title for repealing the restrictive Licensing Regulations of 1823 in 1835, which removed licensing requirements for printing presses and allowed for a period of greater freedom and growth for newspapers in India.

Topics Covered

Indian HistoryModern Indian HistoryMedia StudiesPress FreedomColonial PoliciesCensorshipIndian Nationalism