UPSC MainsLAW-PAPER-II202520 Marks
हिंदी में पढ़ें
Q26.

8. (a) "Right to Information, for citizens to secure access to information under the control of public authorities, is an important enactment.” Discuss. Also describe the obligations of public authorities as mentioned in the Act.

How to Approach

The answer will begin by establishing the Right to Information Act, 2005, as a pivotal legislation for transparency and accountability in India. The discussion will then elaborate on its significance by highlighting its impact on governance, citizen empowerment, and combating corruption. Subsequently, the obligations placed upon public authorities by the Act, particularly Section 4, will be detailed. The answer will conclude with a forward-looking perspective, acknowledging challenges and suggesting improvements for the Act's effective implementation.

Model Answer

0 min read

Introduction

The Right to Information (RTI) Act, enacted by the Indian Parliament in 2005, stands as a landmark legislation designed to empower citizens by providing access to information under the control of public authorities. Rooted in the fundamental right to freedom of speech and expression (Article 19(1)(a)) and the right to life (Article 21) of the Indian Constitution, the RTI Act marked a paradigm shift from a culture of secrecy, inherited from colonial-era laws, to one of transparency and accountability. Its primary objective is to foster an informed citizenry, promote openness in governmental functioning, combat corruption, and strengthen participatory democracy, thereby enhancing the relationship between the state and its people.

Significance of the Right to Information Act, 2005

The Right to Information Act, 2005, is often hailed as a "sunshine law" for its profound impact on Indian governance. Its significance can be understood through several key aspects:
  • Empowerment of Citizens: The Act empowers ordinary citizens to demand information from government bodies, shifting the balance of power and enabling them to become active stakeholders in governance. This includes questioning decisions, understanding policies, and scrutinizing public expenditure.
  • Promoting Transparency and Accountability: By making government records accessible, the RTI Act fosters transparency in public administration. Public authorities are required to justify their actions and decisions, reducing arbitrary practices and enhancing accountability.
  • Curbing Corruption: One of the most significant impacts of the RTI Act has been its role in exposing corruption, mismanagement, and inefficiencies across various levels of government. It has brought to light irregularities in contracts, misuse of funds, and other malpractices.
  • Strengthening Participatory Democracy: An informed citizenry is crucial for a vibrant democracy. The RTI Act encourages public discourse and decision-making by making information available, thus strengthening participatory democracy.
  • Improving Public Service Delivery: Citizens have effectively used RTI to secure their rights and entitlements and to demand improvements in public services such as ration distribution, pension disbursement, and local infrastructure development.
  • Legal and Institutional Framework: The Act established a legal and institutional framework, including the Central Information Commission (CIC) and State Information Commissions (SICs), along with Public Information Officers (PIOs) in every public authority, to facilitate the exercise of this right.

Obligations of Public Authorities under the RTI Act, 2005

The RTI Act places explicit and comprehensive obligations on public authorities to ensure the effective realization of the right to information. These obligations, primarily outlined in Section 4 of the Act, aim to proactively disseminate information and facilitate citizen access.

1. Maintaining Records (Section 4(1)(a)):

Every public authority is mandated to maintain all its records duly catalogued and indexed in a manner that facilitates the right to information. This includes:
  • Ensuring that all records appropriate for computerization are computerized within a reasonable time and connected through a network.
  • Regular review of record management to ensure compliance and accessibility.

2. Proactive Disclosure of Information (Section 4(1)(b)):

Public authorities are required to publish certain particulars within 120 days of the enactment of the Act, and thereafter update these publications annually. This "suo motu" disclosure covers sixteen categories of information, including:
  • Particulars of its organization, functions, and duties.
  • Powers and duties of its officers and employees.
  • Procedure followed in the decision-making process, including channels of supervision and accountability.
  • Norms set for the discharge of its functions.
  • Rules, regulations, instructions, manuals, and records used by its employees for discharging functions.
  • A statement of the categories of documents held by it or under its control.
  • Particulars of any arrangement for consultation with, or representation by, members of the public in policy formulation or implementation.
  • A statement of boards, councils, committees, and other bodies constituted, and whether their meetings are open to the public or if their minutes are accessible.
  • A directory of its officers and employees.
  • The monthly remuneration received by each of its officers and employees.
  • The budget allocated to each of its agencies, indicating plans, proposed expenditures, and reports on disbursements.
  • Manner of execution of subsidy programmes, including the amounts allocated and details of beneficiaries.
  • Particulars of recipients of concessions, permits, or authorizations granted.
  • Details of information available in electronic form.
  • Particulars of facilities available to citizens for obtaining information, including working hours of a library or reading room.
  • The names, designations, and other particulars of the Public Information Officers.

3. Publishing Relevant Facts and Reasons (Section 4(1)(c) and (d)):

  • Public authorities must publish all relevant facts while formulating important policies or announcing decisions that affect the public.
  • They are also obliged to provide reasons for their administrative or quasi-judicial decisions to affected persons.

4. Minimizing Recourse to the Act (Section 4(2)):

It is a constant endeavor of every public authority to provide as much information proactively through various means, including the internet, so that the public has minimum resort to formal RTI applications.

5. Designation of Public Information Officers (Section 5):

Every public authority must designate Central Public Information Officers (CPIOs) or State Public Information Officers (SPIOs) in all its administrative units to provide information to applicants. Additionally, Central Assistant Public Information Officers (CAPIOs) or State Assistant Public Information Officers (SAPIOs) are to be designated at the sub-divisional or sub-district levels to receive applications.

6. Providing Information in Time-Bound Manner (Section 7):

Upon receiving a request, the PIO must either provide the information or reject the request within 30 days. In cases involving the life or liberty of a person, the information must be provided within 48 hours. Failure to provide information within the prescribed time limit entitles the applicant to receive the information free of charge. These obligations collectively aim to transform government functioning into an open, transparent, and accountable system, fostering trust and active citizen participation.

Conclusion

The Right to Information Act, 2005, is an indispensable legislative tool that has profoundly reshaped the landscape of governance in India. By empowering citizens to demand transparency and accountability, it has acted as a bulwark against corruption and reinforced democratic principles. The comprehensive obligations placed on public authorities, particularly regarding proactive disclosure and timely information dissemination, are crucial for its efficacy. While challenges like bureaucratic resistance, backlogs in information commissions (with over 4 lakh cases pending as of June 2024), and insufficient awareness persist, continuous efforts to strengthen implementation, improve digital infrastructure, and protect RTI activists are vital to fully realize the Act's transformative potential for good governance and citizen empowerment.

Answer Length

This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.

Additional Resources

Key Definitions

Public Authority
As defined in Section 2(h) of the RTI Act, 2005, a "public authority" means any authority or body or institution of self-government established or constituted by or under the Constitution; by any other law made by Parliament; by any other law made by State Legislature; or by notification issued or order made by the appropriate Government, and includes any body owned, controlled or substantially financed by the Government.
Right to Information
Section 2(j) of the RTI Act, 2005, defines "right to information" as the right to information accessible under this Act which is held by or under the control of any public authority and includes the right to inspect work, documents, records; taking notes, extracts or certified copies of documents or records; taking certified samples of material; obtaining information in the form of diskettes, floppies, tapes, video cassettes or in any other electronic mode or through printouts where such information is stored in a computer or in any other device.

Key Statistics

As of June 30, 2024, over 4 lakh appeals and complaints were pending across 29 information commissions nationwide, highlighting significant backlogs and delays in citizens' access to information.

Source: Satark Nagrik Sangathan report, October 2024

In 2021-22, 14.21 lakh RTI applications were filed seeking information from the Union Government, marking a 6.55% increase from the previous year.

Source: Central Information Commission's annual report, cited by CHRI, April 2023

Examples

Adarsh Housing Society Scam

The RTI Act played a crucial role in exposing the Adarsh Housing Society scam in Mumbai, where a 31-story building meant for Kargil war heroes and widows was allegedly illegally constructed and allotted to bureaucrats, politicians, and military officials.

Jan Sunwai (Public Hearings)

In Rajasthan, the Mazdoor Kisan Shakti Sangathan (MKSS) spearheaded a grassroots movement for the right to information, organizing 'Jan Sunwais' (public hearings) where villagers used official records to audit development works and expose corruption long before the national RTI Act.

Frequently Asked Questions

What types of information are exempt from disclosure under the RTI Act?

Section 8 of the RTI Act lists several exemptions, including information that would prejudicially affect the sovereignty and integrity of India, national security, strategic, scientific or economic interests of the State, relations with a foreign State, or lead to incitement of an offence. It also exempts information relating to personal information the disclosure of which has no relationship to any public activity or interest, or which would cause unwarranted invasion of the privacy of the individual.

What happens if a Public Information Officer (PIO) fails to provide information within the stipulated time?

If a PIO fails to provide information within the prescribed 30-day (or 48-hour in life/liberty cases) period without reasonable cause, they may be liable to a penalty of Rs. 250 per day until the information is furnished, with the total penalty not exceeding Rs. 25,000. Additionally, the applicant is entitled to receive the information free of cost.

Topics Covered

LawGovernanceTransparencyRight to Information ActPublic AuthoritiesInformation DisclosureCitizen Rights