Model Answer
0 min readIntroduction
The philosophical approach is the oldest and most traditional method for studying political theory, tracing its roots back to ancient Greece with thinkers like Plato and Aristotle. It primarily delves into the normative and ethical dimensions of politics, seeking to understand not just "what is" but "what ought to be" in political life. This approach is concerned with fundamental questions about justice, ideal governance, rights, liberty, and equality, providing a moral compass for evaluating political systems and actions. It transcends mere empirical observation, engaging in abstract reasoning and conceptual analysis to establish foundational principles for a good society and legitimate political authority.
The philosophical approach to political theory is fundamentally concerned with establishing a normative framework for understanding political phenomena. It seeks to answer profound questions about human nature, society, and the state, drawing upon ethical and moral reasoning rather than solely empirical observation.
Key Features of the Philosophical Approach
- Normative Focus: This approach is primarily normative, meaning it prescribes what 'ought to be' rather than merely describing 'what is'. It focuses on ideals, values, and ethical principles that should guide political life and institutions. Thinkers explore concepts like justice, freedom, equality, and rights to determine the best possible political order.
- Conceptual Analysis: A central aspect is the rigorous analysis and clarification of core political concepts. Philosophers delve into the meaning of terms like 'state', 'power', 'authority', 'democracy', and 'justice', exploring their various interpretations and implications.
- Quest for Ideal State: Many philosophical theorists, from Plato onwards, have been concerned with constructing models of an ideal state or a just society. These models serve as benchmarks against which existing political systems can be evaluated and reformed.
- Deductive Reasoning: The philosophical approach often employs deductive reasoning, deriving specific conclusions from general principles or universal truths about human nature and morality.
- Value-laden: It explicitly integrates values into the study of politics, arguing that a truly meaningful understanding of political life cannot be value-neutral. Political science, in this view, is inherently intertwined with moral philosophy.
Historical Development and Major Thinkers
The philosophical approach has been championed by many foundational thinkers throughout history:
- Ancient Greek Philosophers:
- Plato (427-347 BCE): Often considered the father of political philosophy, Plato, in his work The Republic, envisioned an ideal state ruled by philosopher-kings guided by wisdom and justice. He emphasized the pursuit of the "Form of Good."
- Aristotle (384-322 BCE): While more empirical than Plato, Aristotle's Politics still engaged with normative questions about the best form of government and the nature of the good life for citizens. He believed politics was the "master science" concerned with achieving the highest good for the community.
- Modern Political Philosophers:
- John Locke (1632-1704): His theory of natural rights and the social contract profoundly influenced modern liberalism and democratic thought.
- Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1712-1778): Explored ideas of popular sovereignty and the 'general will' in his work The Social Contract.
- Immanuel Kant (1724-1804): Emphasized universal moral laws and the concept of perpetual peace.
- John Rawls (1921-2002): In his A Theory of Justice, he presented a modern philosophical argument for principles of justice based on a hypothetical "original position" and "veil of ignorance."
Criticisms of the Philosophical Approach
Despite its profound influence, the philosophical approach has faced several criticisms:
- Lack of Empirical Basis: Critics, particularly behaviorists, argue that it is too abstract and speculative, lacking empirical verifiability. They contend that it deals with ideals rather than the observable realities of political behavior.
- Utopianism: The focus on ideal states can sometimes lead to theories that are deemed impractical or utopian, detached from the complexities and imperfections of real-world politics.
- Subjectivity: Philosophical arguments can be subjective and value-laden, making it difficult to achieve universal consensus or objective truth.
- Bias: Some argue that philosophical theories can be inherently biased, reflecting the cultural and historical context of the philosopher rather than universal truths.
Conclusion
The philosophical approach remains an indispensable pillar of political theory. By pushing us to reflect on fundamental questions of justice, ethics, and the ideal state, it provides the normative foundation for evaluating existing political orders and aspiring towards better ones. While often criticized for its abstractness, its enduring legacy lies in its capacity to inspire critical thinking, challenge the status quo, and articulate the moral vision necessary for shaping constitutional values and human rights discourses globally. In an increasingly complex world, its emphasis on reasoned discourse about what "ought to be" continues to guide the pursuit of just and legitimate governance.
Answer Length
This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.