Model Answer
0 min readIntroduction
The Non-Aligned Movement (NAM), established in 1961 amidst the Cold War, was a forum for 120 developing nations to assert their independence from the two major power blocs. Founded on principles like national independence, sovereignty, and peaceful coexistence, NAM aimed to provide a "third way" for countries unwilling to align with either the US or the Soviet Union. India, as a founding member, played a pivotal role in shaping its initial direction. However, in the post-Cold War era and with India's increasing global stature, there has been a noticeable shift in India's foreign policy from traditional non-alignment to a more pragmatic "multi-alignment" approach, raising questions about NAM's continued relevance.
Evolution of India's Stance towards NAM
India's foreign policy, initially championed by Jawaharlal Nehru, was deeply rooted in non-alignment, allowing it to navigate the bipolar world and advocate for the Global South. However, in the 21st century, India's engagement with NAM has evolved:
- Reduced High-Level Participation: For several years, India's participation at NAM summits was often at the Vice-Presidential or ministerial level, indicating a perceived dip in its priority compared to other multilateral forums.
- Shift to Multi-alignment: India's current foreign policy emphasizes 'multi-alignment' or 'multi-vector engagement.' This involves cultivating diverse partnerships with major powers (like the US, Russia, Europe, Japan, and Australia) and participating in various groupings (e.g., BRICS, SCO, Quad, G20) to advance its national interests, rather than rigidly adhering to a non-bloc stance. This approach prioritizes strategic autonomy through flexible engagement.
- Pragmatism over Ideology: The current Indian leadership has expressed a more pragmatic view, with External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar stating that "non-alignment was a term of a particular era and a particular geopolitical landscape." This reflects a shift towards issue-based coalitions.
Challenges to NAM's Future Relevance
Several factors challenge NAM's future:
- End of Bipolarity: The Cold War's conclusion removed NAM's original raison d'être of offering an alternative to superpower blocs. The world is now multipolar, with new geopolitical dynamics.
- Internal Cohesion: With 121 member states, NAM faces challenges in achieving consensus and presenting a unified front on complex global issues due to diverse national interests and political systems.
- Lack of Executive Body: NAM lacks a permanent secretariat or a formal constitution, which can hinder coordinated action and effective implementation of its resolutions.
- Rise of Alternative Forums: Regional and issue-specific groupings like ASEAN, African Union, BRICS, and SCO often offer more focused platforms for cooperation among developing nations.
Enduring Significance of NAM
Despite these challenges and India's evolving approach, NAM retains potential relevance:
- Voice of the Global South: NAM continues to be the second-largest grouping of states after the UN, representing over 55% of the world's population. It provides a crucial platform for developing countries to collectively voice concerns on issues like climate change, economic inequality, and reform of international institutions (e.g., UN Security Council).
- Multipolar World Order: In a multipolar world, NAM can advocate for a more equitable global governance system, resisting new forms of hegemony and promoting multilateralism.
- Strategic Autonomy: The core principle of strategic autonomy – the freedom to make independent foreign policy decisions – remains highly relevant for many developing nations, including India, even if the methods to achieve it have diversified.
- South-South Cooperation: NAM facilitates South-South cooperation, fostering economic ties, sharing developmental experiences, and addressing common challenges among its members.
- Moral Authority: NAM can still act as a "moral voice" on global issues, advocating for peace, disarmament, and human rights, as emphasized by Prime Minister Modi in the 2020 virtual summit.
Conclusion
While India's growing indifference and pivot towards 'multi-alignment' have undoubtedly reshaped its engagement with NAM, the movement is not entirely obsolete. Its future hinges on its ability to adapt to contemporary challenges and redefine its objectives beyond its Cold War origins. As a platform for the Global South, NAM can continue to be a significant collective voice against unilateralism, promoting multilateralism, sustainable development, and a more inclusive international order. For India, maintaining engagement with NAM, even if on a more pragmatic basis, offers a valuable avenue to assert its leadership among developing nations and reinforce strategic autonomy in an increasingly complex world.
Answer Length
This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.