UPSC MainsPSYCHOLOGY-PAPER-I202510 Marks150 Words
हिंदी में पढ़ें
Q5.

Answer the following questions in about 150 words each : (e) 'IQ tests are too narrow in focus.' Evaluate the statement from the perspectives of Sternberg and Gardner's theories of intelligence.

How to Approach

The answer should begin by briefly introducing IQ tests and their traditional focus. The core of the answer will then evaluate the statement by presenting the critiques from both Sternberg's Triarchic Theory of Intelligence and Gardner's Theory of Multiple Intelligences. For each theorist, explain their alternative view of intelligence and how it broadens the concept beyond what IQ tests measure. Conclude by summarizing their combined argument against the narrowness of IQ tests.

Model Answer

0 min read

Introduction

Intelligence Quotient (IQ) tests have historically been a primary tool for measuring cognitive abilities, typically focusing on logical-mathematical and linguistic skills. Developed primarily in the early 20th century, these tests quantify intelligence as a single, general factor ("g"). However, a growing consensus among psychologists, especially from the late 20th century onwards, suggests that this approach is overly simplistic. The statement that 'IQ tests are too narrow in focus' directly challenges this traditional view, positing that human intelligence is far more multifaceted than what a singular score can capture. This critique is strongly supported by the influential theories of Robert Sternberg and Howard Gardner, who propose more comprehensive models of intelligence.

Evaluating the Narrow Focus of IQ Tests: Sternberg and Gardner's Perspectives

Traditional IQ tests primarily assess analytical or academic intelligence, measuring abilities like verbal reasoning, logical problem-solving, and spatial manipulation. However, this narrow scope fails to capture the full spectrum of human capabilities and potential, as highlighted by contemporary theories of intelligence.

Sternberg's Triarchic Theory of Intelligence

Robert Sternberg's Triarchic Theory (1985) argues that intelligence is not a single entity but comprises three distinct, yet interconnected, sub-theories necessary for "successful intelligence" – the ability to succeed in life based on one's standards and sociocultural context. He criticized IQ tests for their limited focus on analytical skills.

  • Analytical Intelligence (Componential): This is the academic, problem-solving ability typically measured by IQ tests. It involves planning, monitoring, and evaluating. While recognized, Sternberg argues it's only one aspect.
  • Creative Intelligence (Experiential): This involves the ability to deal with novel situations and generate new ideas or solutions. It emphasizes insight and the capacity to automate information processing, which IQ tests largely ignore.
  • Practical Intelligence (Contextual): Often called "street smarts," this is the ability to adapt to, shape, or select real-world environments. It involves applying knowledge effectively in everyday situations, a skill set minimally assessed by standard IQ tests.

From Sternberg's perspective, IQ tests are narrow because they predominantly evaluate analytical intelligence, neglecting the crucial creative and practical dimensions that are vital for real-world success and adaptation.

Gardner's Theory of Multiple Intelligences

Howard Gardner's Theory of Multiple Intelligences (1983) radically departed from the idea of a single intelligence, proposing instead that humans possess several distinct intelligences that are relatively independent of each other. He argued that traditional IQ tests only scratch the surface of human cognitive diversity.

Gardner initially identified seven (later expanded to nine) intelligences:

  • Linguistic Intelligence: Word smarts (e.g., writers, poets).
  • Logical-Mathematical Intelligence: Number/reasoning smarts (e.g., scientists, mathematicians). This is heavily emphasized by IQ tests.
  • Spatial Intelligence: Picture smarts (e.g., artists, architects).
  • Bodily-Kinesthetic Intelligence: Body smarts (e.g., dancers, athletes).
  • Musical Intelligence: Music smarts (e.g., musicians, composers).
  • Interpersonal Intelligence: People smarts (e.g., leaders, teachers).
  • Intrapersonal Intelligence: Self smarts (e.g., therapists, philosophers).
  • Naturalistic Intelligence: Nature smarts (e.g., biologists, environmentalists).
  • Existential Intelligence (proposed): Life smarts (e.g., philosophers, spiritual leaders).

Gardner contends that IQ tests are narrow because they primarily measure only linguistic and logical-mathematical intelligences, thereby overlooking a vast array of other valuable human talents and abilities. This limited assessment can lead to mislabeling individuals and failing to recognize diverse forms of intellectual strength.

Conclusion

Both Sternberg and Gardner offer robust evaluations, concluding that IQ tests are indeed too narrow in focus. Sternberg emphasizes the importance of creative and practical intelligence alongside analytical skills for successful adaptation, while Gardner highlights the existence of diverse, independent intelligences beyond the scope of traditional assessments. Their theories advocate for a broader, more holistic understanding of human intelligence, urging educational and societal systems to move beyond a singular, limited measure and recognize the multifaceted nature of human potential.

Answer Length

This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.

Additional Resources

Key Definitions

Intelligence Quotient (IQ)
A score derived from standardized tests designed to assess cognitive abilities, historically used as a measure of a person's intellectual potential relative to their age group. It typically focuses on logical reasoning, verbal comprehension, and spatial ability.
Successful Intelligence
A concept introduced by Robert Sternberg, defining intelligence as the ability to achieve success in life, according to one's own definition of success, within one's sociocultural context. It involves a balance of analytical, creative, and practical abilities.

Key Statistics

A 2021 study by Adam Hampshire of the Brain and Mind Institute found that standard IQ tests are poor indicators of overall intelligence, identifying at least three distinct factors (short-term memory, reasoning, and a verbal component) essential to predicting intelligence, and noting their inability to measure emotional and social intelligence.

Source: Educational Connections (2021)

Despite the popularity of Gardner's theory among educators, a 2023 journal article described the theory of Multiple Intelligences as a "neuromyth" due to a lack of empirical evidence supporting distinct neurological bases for each intelligence, highlighting ongoing debate in scientific communities.

Source: Verywell Mind (2025)

Examples

The Unrecognized Genius

A student who consistently performs poorly on standardized tests (low IQ score) might excel in building complex mechanical models or demonstrate exceptional leadership skills in group projects. Traditional IQ tests would fail to recognize their high bodily-kinesthetic or interpersonal intelligence, leading to a narrow perception of their intellectual capacity.

Practical Problem Solvers

An entrepreneur who lacks formal education but possesses exceptional "street smarts" – the ability to navigate complex social situations, negotiate deals, and adapt quickly to changing market conditions – demonstrates high practical intelligence. Their success would not be predicted or adequately explained by a high IQ score alone.

Frequently Asked Questions

Do IQ tests have any valid use?

While heavily criticized for their narrowness, IQ tests can still be useful for specific purposes, such as identifying learning disabilities, assessing cognitive decline, or predicting academic performance in certain contexts. However, they should not be seen as a comprehensive measure of overall intelligence or life success.

Can intelligence be improved?

Both Sternberg and Gardner suggest that intelligence is not static. Sternberg views it as dynamic and capable of development through experience and internal processes, while Gardner implies that different intelligences can be nurtured and strengthened through appropriate educational practices and exposure to diverse experiences.

Topics Covered

PsychologyCognitive PsychologyIntelligenceIntelligence TestingTheories of Intelligence