UPSC MainsPUBLIC-ADMINISTRATION-PAPER-I202510 Marks150 Words
हिंदी में पढ़ें
Q3.

Has the media nixed its role in holding the governments accountable and ensuring transparency? Argue.

How to Approach

The question asks to argue whether the media has "nixed" (negated/abandoned) its role in holding governments accountable and ensuring transparency. The approach should involve presenting a balanced argument, acknowledging both the media's continued positive contributions and the significant challenges and criticisms that suggest a diminished role. The answer needs to cite specific examples, challenges, and regulatory aspects in the Indian context to strengthen the argument.

Model Answer

0 min read

Introduction

The media, often hailed as the "fourth pillar of democracy," traditionally plays a crucial role in a vibrant democracy by acting as a watchdog, holding governments accountable, and ensuring transparency. This function is enshrined implicitly in Article 19(1)(a) of the Indian Constitution, guaranteeing freedom of speech and expression. However, in recent times, there's a growing debate on whether the Indian media has effectively abandoned this vital role. While pockets of independent journalism continue to thrive, several systemic issues and emerging trends suggest a complex picture, indicating both persistent efforts and significant erosions in its capacity to fulfill this critical democratic mandate.

Media's Continuing Role in Accountability and Transparency

Despite significant challenges, the media continues to play a role in promoting accountability and transparency in governance. This is evident through:

  • Investigative Journalism: Historically, the media has exposed major scams and wrongdoings, forcing governments to address corruption and mismanagement. Examples include the Bofors scam and the 2G spectrum scam, which led to significant public discourse and calls for accountability.
  • Public Awareness and Education: Media serves as a vital platform for informing citizens about government policies, schemes, and societal issues. This enables informed public participation and demands for better governance.
  • Platform for Dissent and Debate: Independent media outlets and digital platforms often provide a space for diverse opinions, critical analysis, and citizen voices, which can act as a check on governmental power.
  • Use of RTI Act: Journalists frequently leverage the Right to Information Act (2005) to uncover information of public interest, thereby fostering transparency.
  • Social Media's Role: Social media platforms have democratized information dissemination, allowing citizens to directly engage with governments, voice opinions, and mobilize collective action, thereby enhancing accountability in real-time.

Challenges Leading to a Nixed Role

However, several factors suggest that the media's role in holding governments accountable and ensuring transparency has been significantly compromised:

1. Political and Corporate Influence

  • Ownership Concentration: Many media houses are owned by large business conglomerates or individuals with strong political ties, leading to editorial bias and a blurring of lines between news and propaganda. This "owner's shadow" can dictate editorial choices, often aligning with government narratives.
  • Government Advertising Revenue: Governments are major advertisers, creating an economic dependency that can lead to self-censorship and a reluctance to publish critical stories to ensure continued financial support.

2. Decline in Journalistic Ethics and Standards

  • TRP-Driven Sensationalism: The fierce competition for Television Rating Points (TRPs) often prioritizes sensationalism over accurate and in-depth reporting. This can lead to exaggerated headlines, biased reporting, and a focus on trivial issues rather than substantive governance concerns. The TRP manipulation scam of 2020 highlighted how channels allegedly inflated viewership ratings for higher advertising revenue.
  • Paid News and Fake News: The phenomenon of "paid news," where news items are published for a fee, and the proliferation of fake news, especially on digital platforms, erode public trust and distort factual reporting, making it difficult for citizens to distinguish between authentic and manipulated information.

3. Threats to Press Freedom and Journalists' Safety

  • Declining Press Freedom Index: India's ranking in the World Press Freedom Index has shown a concerning decline. In 2024, India ranked 159 out of 180 countries (Reporters Without Borders). This indicates a challenging environment for journalists to work freely and independently.
  • Harassment and Legal Persecution: Journalists who are critical of the government often face online harassment, intimidation, physical assaults, criminal charges (e.g., sedition laws), and arbitrary arrests, particularly in sensitive regions.

4. Inadequate Regulatory Frameworks

  • Self-Regulation Limitations: Bodies like the Press Council of India (PCI) for print media and the News Broadcasting Standards Authority (NBSA) for television are largely self-regulatory and have limited punitive powers, often issuing guidelines rather than enforcing strict compliance.
  • Digital Media Regulation Gaps: The rapidly evolving digital media landscape often lacks comprehensive and effective regulatory oversight, leading to challenges in accountability.

Comparative Analysis of Media's Role

Aspect Positive Contributions Challenges/Nixed Role
Investigative Reporting Exposed scams (Bofors, 2G Spectrum), forced government action. Reduced due to corporate pressure, political intimidation.
Information Dissemination Informs public on policies, social issues, electoral processes. Rise of "Godi Media," biased reporting, spread of misinformation.
Watchdog Function Scrutiny of government actions, using RTI for transparency. Self-censorship, lack of critical reporting, fear of reprisal.
Public Discourse Provides platform for diverse voices and debates (especially social media). Polarization of debates, echo chambers, spread of hate speech.

Conclusion

While the media, particularly some independent digital platforms and local journalism, continues to make efforts to uphold its role as a watchdog, the argument that its capacity to hold governments accountable and ensure transparency has been "nixed" holds considerable weight. Factors like political and corporate control, the pursuit of TRPs, the rise of misinformation, and threats to journalistic freedom have significantly eroded its autonomy and credibility. Restoring this crucial pillar of democracy requires a multi-pronged approach involving stronger ethical standards, media literacy campaigns, robust legal protections for journalists, transparent media ownership, and a committed civil society demanding unbiased reporting.

Answer Length

This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.

Additional Resources

Key Definitions

Fourth Estate
A term referring to the media (press and broadcast journalism) as a sector of society whose collective role is to inform the public and act as a watchdog on government and corporate power, thus serving as a vital check and balance in a democracy.
Godi Media
A colloquial and critical term used in India to describe media outlets perceived to be biased towards and subservient to the ruling government, often amplifying government narratives and suppressing critical voices. The term literally translates to "lapdog media."

Key Statistics

India ranked 159 out of 180 countries in the 2024 World Press Freedom Index, published by Reporters Without Borders (RSF). This reflects a decline from its 2014 rank of 140.

Source: Reporters Without Borders (RSF) - World Press Freedom Index 2024

Approximately 70% of revenue for television channels in India comes from advertising, highlighting the significant financial dependence on advertising, which can be influenced by TRP ratings and government expenditure.

Source: The Federal (2020) and various media reports on TRP scam

Examples

TRP Manipulation Scam (2020)

Mumbai Police unearthed a scam where certain television channels, including a leading English news channel, allegedly manipulated their Television Rating Points (TRPs) by bribing households to keep their TVs tuned to specific channels. This was done to fraudulently inflate viewership ratings and thereby secure higher advertising revenues, severely compromising media ethics.

NDTV Acquisition by Adani Group (2022)

The acquisition of a significant stake in NDTV, a news channel known for its critical stance, by the Adani Group raised concerns about media independence. Critics pointed to the close association of the Adani Group's chairman with the ruling political establishment, fearing a potential shift in editorial policy and reduced critical coverage.

Frequently Asked Questions

What role do regulatory bodies play in ensuring media accountability in India?

Bodies like the Press Council of India (for print) and the News Broadcasting Standards Authority (for TV) issue guidelines and codes of conduct. However, their powers are largely advisory, lacking strong punitive measures, which limits their effectiveness in enforcing accountability.

Topics Covered

Public Administration and SocietyMedia and GovernanceAccountabilityTransparency