UPSC MainsPUBLIC-ADMINISTRATION-PAPER-II202510 Marks150 Words
हिंदी में पढ़ें
Q2.

Answer the following in about 150 words each : (b) Trace the reasons for limited effectiveness of the NITI Aayog.

How to Approach

The question asks to trace the reasons for the limited effectiveness of NITI Aayog. The approach should involve defining NITI Aayog and its mandate briefly in the introduction. The body should systematically discuss structural and functional limitations, including its advisory role, lack of financial powers, federal friction, and issues related to capacity and politicization. Conclude with suggestions for enhancing its effectiveness.

Model Answer

0 min read

Introduction

NITI Aayog, established on January 1, 2015, replaced the erstwhile Planning Commission with the mandate to serve as the premier policy 'think tank' of the Government of India. It aims to foster cooperative federalism, provide strategic and technical advice to central and state governments, and facilitate a "bottom-up" approach to development. While envisioned to promote dynamic policy shifts and inclusive growth, its effectiveness has been constrained by several structural and functional limitations that hinder its ability to achieve its transformative impact fully.

Reasons for Limited Effectiveness of NITI Aayog

  • Advisory-Only Role: Unlike the Planning Commission, NITI Aayog functions purely as an advisory body. Its recommendations are not binding on either the Central or State governments, significantly reducing its influence on policy implementation and practical impact on the ground. This often leads to it being perceived as a "glorified recommendatory body" [2, 5].
  • Lack of Budgetary Powers: NITI Aayog does not have the authority to allocate funds to states or ministries, a crucial power that the Planning Commission wielded. This absence of financial leverage limits its capacity to incentivize states to adopt its policy recommendations or implement development programs effectively [2, 8].
  • Challenges in Cooperative Federalism: While designed to promote cooperative federalism, NITI Aayog often faces friction with states' autonomy. States, particularly those ruled by opposition parties, have expressed dissatisfaction, perceiving a lack of consultation on financial matters and alleging political favoritism in project allocations [6, 9, 14]. This uneven adoption of suggestions makes it challenging to translate high-level discussions into uniform, actionable strategies across diverse states.
  • Structural and Functional Constraints:
    • Limited Influence on Investments: NITI Aayog has no direct role in influencing private or public investment decisions, further restricting its ability to drive economic change [5].
    • Staffing and Expertise Gaps: Concerns exist regarding perceived gaps in technical expertise across all sectors, which can sometimes limit the quality and comprehensiveness of its advice [6].
    • Politicization: There have been concerns about the politicization of the organization, with its recommendations sometimes seen as closely aligned with central government perspectives rather than independent, objective counsel [5, 6].
  • Inadequate Resources: NITI Aayog sometimes operates with limited financial and human resources, impacting its ability to conduct comprehensive research, develop innovative policies, and effectively monitor implementation [7, 13].

Conclusion

Despite its progressive mandate to act as a think tank fostering cooperative federalism and bottom-up planning, NITI Aayog's effectiveness remains limited by its advisory nature, lack of financial powers, and occasional friction with state governments. To unlock its full potential, there is a need to empower NITI Aayog with some degree of legislative or financial authority, ensure greater transparency and non-partisanship, and strengthen consultation mechanisms with states. This would enable it to truly drive transformative change and effectively coordinate national development priorities.

Answer Length

This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.

Additional Resources

Key Definitions

NITI Aayog
The National Institution for Transforming India, an apex public policy think tank of the Government of India, tasked with catalyzing economic development and fostering cooperative federalism through a bottom-up approach.
Cooperative Federalism
A concept where the central and state governments cooperate in the formulation and implementation of public policies, moving away from a hierarchical 'bargaining federalism'.

Key Statistics

NITI Aayog replaced the Planning Commission, established in 1950, on January 1, 2015, marking a significant shift in India's governance approach from centralized planning.

Source: NITI Aayog Official Website / Government of India Cabinet Resolution

As of July 2024, several Chief Ministers boycotted a NITI Aayog Governing Council meeting, highlighting concerns over perceived lack of allocations and projects for their states, indicating ongoing federal friction.

Source: The Hindu (July 2024) / ForumIAS (July 2024)

Examples

Planning Commission vs. NITI Aayog

The Planning Commission had executive powers to approve and allocate funds for state plans, allowing it to directly influence development trajectories. In contrast, NITI Aayog, being an advisory body without such financial powers, relies solely on persuasion and consensus, limiting its direct implementational impact.

Aspirational Districts Programme (ADP)

While NITI Aayog's Aspirational Districts Programme (launched 2018) aims to improve socio-economic indicators in identified districts through competitive and cooperative federalism, its success largely depends on the active participation and resource allocation by state governments, underscoring the advisory body's reliance on state cooperation for tangible outcomes.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the primary difference between NITI Aayog and the erstwhile Planning Commission?

The primary difference lies in their operational roles: the Planning Commission was a centralized body with powers to allocate funds and approve state plans (top-down approach), while NITI Aayog is an advisory think tank promoting cooperative federalism and a bottom-up approach, lacking direct financial allocation powers.

Is NITI Aayog a constitutional or statutory body?

NITI Aayog is neither a constitutional body nor a statutory body. It was established by a Cabinet Resolution of the Government of India, making it an extra-constitutional body.

Topics Covered

GovernancePolicyNITI AayogPolicy FormulationInstitutional Effectiveness