Dalvoy Logo
Dalvoy
UPSC MainsSOCIOLOGY-PAPER-I202510 Marks150 Words
हिंदी में पढ़ें
Q16.

Answer the following questions in about 150 words each: (b) Does the structural-functionalist perspective on social stratification promote a status quo? Give reasons for your answer.

How to Approach

The approach to this question should begin by defining structural-functionalism and its core tenets regarding social stratification, particularly the Davis-Moore thesis. The answer should then take a clear stand on whether this perspective promotes the status quo, providing specific reasons. Critiques of the functionalist view, highlighting how it legitimizes existing inequalities, should form the core of the argument. Conclude by acknowledging the perspective's contributions while emphasizing its limitations in addressing social change and justice.

Model Answer

0 min read

Introduction

Social stratification refers to the hierarchical arrangement of individuals and groups in society based on factors like wealth, status, and power. Different sociological perspectives offer varying explanations for its existence. The structural-functionalist perspective, notably articulated by Kingsley Davis and Wilbert Moore, posits that social stratification is universal, inevitable, and functionally necessary for the smooth operation and stability of society. This perspective argues that unequal distribution of rewards serves to motivate talented individuals to fill important and demanding societal roles, thereby ensuring the most crucial positions are competently occupied.

Does Structural-Functionalism Promote a Status Quo?

Yes, the structural-functionalist perspective on social stratification is widely criticized for inherently promoting and legitimizing the status quo. This stems from its foundational assumptions and the implications of its arguments.

Reasons for Promoting the Status Quo:

  • Justification of Inequality: The Davis-Moore thesis argues that differential rewards (income, prestige) are necessary incentives to attract the most capable individuals to functionally important positions. By framing inequality as a prerequisite for societal efficiency, it implicitly justifies existing disparities rather than questioning their origins or fairness. This rationalization discourages any radical redistribution of wealth or power.
  • Emphasis on Social Stability and Order: Functionalism views society as an integrated system striving for equilibrium. It highlights how various social strata contribute to collective order and integration, focusing on the harmonious aspects of the system. This emphasis on stability over change tends to maintain current social arrangements and discourages reform movements that might threaten the existing balance.
  • Neglect of Power, Exploitation, and Conflict: A significant criticism is that this perspective largely overlooks the role of power dynamics, exploitation, and historical injustices in shaping social hierarchies. It downplays how elites might maintain their privileged positions through control of resources, political influence, and cultural domination, rather than purely through merit. By ignoring these elements, functionalism presents stratification as consensual and beneficial, thereby legitimizing existing power structures.
  • Assumption of Meritocracy: The functionalist perspective often assumes an open and meritocratic system where individuals rise based on their talents and efforts. However, critics like Melvin Tumin argue that social stratification itself limits the discovery and development of talent from lower strata due to unequal access to opportunities, education, and resources. This assumption masks systemic barriers and inherited advantages, thereby reinforcing the existing hierarchy.
  • Naturalization of Hierarchy: By arguing that stratification is a universal and "functionally necessary" mechanism, the theory risks naturalizing existing hierarchies. It treats current social arrangements, even those emerging from historical processes of exploitation or colonialism, as inevitable and natural, making them appear unchallengeable rather than historically contingent and reformable.

Therefore, by portraying inequality as a functional and necessary mechanism for societal efficiency and stability, structural-functionalism implicitly legitimizes existing hierarchies and discourages fundamental social change, reinforcing the status quo.

Conclusion

In conclusion, while the structural-functionalist perspective offers valuable insights into how social stratification might contribute to societal order and motivate individuals, its inherent focus on the functional necessity and stability of existing hierarchies leads it to largely promote the status quo. By justifying inequalities as essential for societal functioning and often overlooking the role of power, conflict, and systemic barriers, it tends to legitimize existing social arrangements rather than encouraging critical examination or fundamental social reform. A comprehensive understanding of social stratification requires considering alternative perspectives that highlight its exploitative dimensions and the potential for social change.

Answer Length

This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.

Evaluate your handwritten answer in under a minute

Free trial available • Trusted by 1,00,000+ aspirants

Additional Resources

Key Definitions

Structural-Functionalism
A sociological paradigm that views society as a complex system whose parts work together to promote solidarity and stability. It focuses on how social structures contribute to the overall functioning of society.
Davis-Moore Thesis
A central claim within structural-functionalism, advanced by Kingsley Davis and Wilbert Moore, which argues that social stratification is functionally necessary. It posits that society must offer greater rewards for functionally important and difficult positions to motivate talented individuals to fill them.

Key Statistics

The top 1% of the Indian population owned over 40% of the country's total wealth in 2022, while the bottom 50% owned less than 3%. This highlights extreme wealth inequality that challenges purely meritocratic explanations of stratification.

Source: Oxfam India, "Survival of the Richest" Report (2023)

According to the World Bank, India's Gini coefficient, a measure of income inequality, was estimated at 35.7 in 2021, indicating significant income disparities within the country.

Source: World Bank Data (2021)

Examples

Critique by Melvin Tumin

Melvin Tumin, in his 1953 critique of the Davis-Moore thesis, argued that stratification systems often limit the discovery of talent by restricting opportunities for those in lower strata. He questioned the criteria for "functional importance" and highlighted how existing inequalities perpetuate themselves.

Inherited Wealth and Privilege

The prevalence of inherited wealth, access to elite education, and strong social networks among privileged groups in many societies demonstrates that success is not solely a result of individual merit or the functional importance of roles, but also of pre-existing structural advantages, challenging the functionalist ideal of meritocracy.

Frequently Asked Questions

▶What is the alternative perspective to structural-functionalism on social stratification?

The main alternative is the Conflict Theory (e.g., Marxian perspective), which argues that social stratification is a result of power struggles and exploitation, where dominant groups maintain their position by controlling resources and ideologies, leading to inherent inequalities and conflict rather than consensus.

▶Does structural-functionalism completely ignore social change?

Structural-functionalism does not completely ignore social change, but it tends to view it as an adaptive response to internal tensions or external pressures that helps the system regain equilibrium. It generally prefers gradual, evolutionary change over revolutionary or radical transformations, which are seen as disruptive to social order.

Topics Covered

Sociological TheorySocial StratificationStructural FunctionalismSocial OrderInequalitySocial Stability
Back to all SOCIOLOGY-PAPER-I 2025 questions