Which one of the following statements is correct?

Correct Answer: C) No procedure has been laid down in the Constitution of India for the removal of a Governor from his/her post

This is correct. The Constitution of India does not specify any formal procedure for the removal of a Governor. While the Governor holds office at the pleasure of the President (Article 156), this doesn't translate to a defined removal process like impeachment. The President can remove a Governor without stating any reason.

Let's analyze why other options are incorrect:

A) In India, the same person cannot be appointed as Governor for two or more States at the same time - This is incorrect. The President can appoint the same person as Governor for multiple states simultaneously. This practice has been followed in the past to address administrative convenience.

B) The Judges of the High Court of the States in India are appointed by the Governor of the State just as the Judges of the Supreme Court are appointed by the President - This is incorrect. High Court Judges are appointed by the President in consultation with the Chief Justice of India and the Chief Justice of the High Court concerned. The Governor plays no direct role in their appointment. Supreme Court Judges are appointed by the President in consultation with the CJI and other senior judges.

D) In the case of a Union Territory having a legislative setup, the Chief Minister is appointed by the Lt. Governor on the basis of majority support - This is incorrect. In UTs with legislative assemblies, the Lt. Governor appoints the Chief Minister who commands the majority in the assembly. However, this is done based on the election results and the support demonstrated by the elected representatives, not simply 'on the basis of majority support' as a continuous process.