UPSC MainsGeneral Studies Paper IIndian PolityPractice question

Role of Governor in Centre-State Relations

Discuss the role of the Governor in maintaining the state-level power balance and the reasons that give rise to conflicts in Centre-State relations. Suggest measures to address these challenges.

DiscussSuggest~250 words2 min readmedium
Attempt it first, timed · optional

Write the answer on paper, as in the exam. Start the timer, keep to the word target.

00:00/ 11 min · 250 words

Done writing? Photograph the sheet and see how it scores against this model answer, with feedback on what to fix.

Upload your answer sheet

How to approach

Begin by outlining the constitutional position and dual role of the Governor under Article 153. Detail the executive, legislative, and statutory functions affecting state power balance, followed by the contemporary points of friction between Governors and elected state governments. Conclude by suggesting reformative measures based on landmark judicial pronouncements and administrative committee recommendations.

Model answer

359 words

Introduction

Under Article 153 of the Constitution, the Governor serves as the constitutional head of the State and acts as a vital link between the Union and the States. While envisioned to promote cooperative federalism and constitutional stability, the exercise of gubernatorial powers has frequently become a major flashpoint in Centre-State relations.

Role in the State-Level Power Balance

  • Executive Authority: The Governor appoints the Chief Minister and Council of Ministers, exercising situational discretion under Article 163 during hung assemblies or abrupt loss of legislative majority.
  • Legislative Oversight: The office summons, prorogues, and dissolves the legislative assembly, issues ordinances under Article 213 during recess, and grants assent to state legislation under Article 200.
  • Statutory Responsibilities: The Governor typically serves as the ex-officio Chancellor of state-run universities, presiding over university governance and academic appointments.

Key Drivers of Centre-State Conflict

  • Withholding Assent to Bills: Governors indefinitely delaying state bills create an effective pocket veto not sanctioned by the Constitution, sparking litigation in states such as Kerala, Tamil Nadu, and Punjab.
  • Arbitrary Reservation for Presidential Assent: Broad or politicised use of Article 201 to reserve state legislation for the President bypasses the authority of democratically elected state assemblies.
  • Partisan Discretion and Central Intervention: Recommendations for President’s Rule under Article 356, along with contentious exercises of authority in appointing Vice-Chancellors or selecting leaders post-election, often raise accusations of partisan bias.

Suggested Measures for Reform

  • Judicial Timelines on Assent: In State of Punjab v. Principal Secretary (2023), the Supreme Court ruled that Governors cannot sit on bills indefinitely and must return them to the legislature 'as soon as possible' under the first proviso to Article 200.
  • Punchhi Commission Recommendations: Prescribe a fixed five-year tenure, remove the 'pleasure of the President' doctrine, and introduce an impeachment process by the State Legislature for the Governor's removal.
  • Sarkaria Commission Guidelines: Appoint eminent individuals outside active party politics in direct consultation with the State Chief Minister to ensure neutral constitutional stewardship.

Conclusion

To safeguard the federal architecture of the Constitution, the Governor must function as an impartial constitutional statesman rather than an agent of the Union government. Implementing institutional checks and adherence to established constitutional conventions are essential for cooperative federalism.

Key facts to remember

case study
State of Punjab v. Principal Secretary (2023)

The Supreme Court held that the Governor cannot indefinitely hold back assent to bills passed by the state legislature, reiterating that gubernatorial powers cannot be used to thwart the law-making authority of elected assemblies.

scheme
Punchhi Commission Recommendations (2010)

The Commission recommended amending the Constitution to provide a fixed five-year tenure for Governors and enabling their removal through an impeachment procedure modeled on that of the President.

definition
Situational Discretion under Article 163

The narrow constitutional sphere where the Governor acts without ministerial aid and advice, typically during the appointment of a Chief Minister in a hung assembly or when deciding on the dismissal of a ministry that has lost majority support.

Frequently asked questions

Can a Governor indefinitely delay granting assent to a state bill?

No. The Supreme Court clarified in 2023 that the phrase 'as soon as possible' under Article 200 carries constitutional urgency, meaning Governors must either give assent, withhold assent, or return the bill without creating a de facto pocket veto.