Model Answer
0 min readIntroduction
The Constitution of India recognizes the unique socio-cultural and economic vulnerabilities of Scheduled Tribes (STs), constituting approximately 8.6% of the country’s population (as per 2011 Census). To safeguard their interests and preserve their distinct identities, the Constitution incorporates special provisions through the Fifth and Sixth Schedules. These schedules aim to grant a degree of autonomy and self-governance to tribal communities, particularly in areas with a predominant tribal population. The implementation, however, has been fraught with challenges, necessitating constant review and adaptation to evolving needs. This answer will delve into the provisions of both schedules, highlighting their scope, strengths, and weaknesses.
The Fifth Schedule – Administration of Tribal Areas
The Fifth Schedule deals with the administration of Scheduled Areas in states like Andhra Pradesh, Telangana, Maharashtra, Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, and Odisha. It came into effect in 1950, with subsequent amendments in 1976.
Key Provisions of the Fifth Schedule:
- Areas Defined: Defines "Scheduled Areas" as areas predominantly inhabited by Scheduled Tribes as specified in the Schedule.
- Legislative Powers: Grants the state legislature power to make laws concerning land, forest, water, minerals, and other matters within the Scheduled Areas. However, Parliament has overriding powers.
- Administration of Tribal Affairs: Provides for the establishment of a Tribal Advisory Council (TAC) to advise the state government on tribal affairs. While the TAC is mandatory, its recommendations are advisory and not binding on the state government.
- Local Self-Governance: Encourages local self-governance through the creation of Village Councils. Article 244(3) mandates that laws made by the State Legislature relating to the transfer of land or its occupancy in the Scheduled Areas shall not be valid without the prior approval of the TAC.
- Protection of Tribal Culture & Traditions: Aims to preserve tribal culture, customs, and traditions.
Limitations of the Fifth Schedule:
- Advisory Nature of TAC: The non-binding nature of TAC recommendations often undermines its effectiveness.
- State Control: The schedule primarily vests power in the state government, which can lead to exploitation and marginalization of tribal communities.
- Lack of Genuine Decentralization: The Village Councils often lack adequate resources and authority to effectively manage local affairs.
The Sixth Schedule – Autonomous District Councils
The Sixth Schedule was introduced in 1952 and applies to states of Assam, Meghalaya, Tripura, and Mizoram. It aims to provide greater autonomy to tribal-dominated districts.
Key Provisions of the Sixth Schedule:
- Autonomous District Councils (ADCs): Establishes ADCs for tribal-dominated districts, granting them legislative, administrative, and judicial powers.
- Powers & Functions: ADCs have powers to make laws on matters like:
- Land and forest
- Agriculture
- Mines and minerals
- Local customary laws
- Local institutions
- Representation: Provides for the election of members to the ADCs.
- Executive Committees: Each ADC has an Executive Committee responsible for the administration of the council.
- Governor’s Role: The Governor can issue directions to the ADC, and the ADC is bound to comply.
Limitations of the Sixth Schedule:
- Limited Powers: The powers of ADCs are limited and subject to the control of the state government.
- Financial Dependence: ADCs are heavily dependent on state government funding, which can compromise their autonomy.
- Political Interference: ADCs are often susceptible to political interference from the state government.
- Lack of Resources and Capacity: Many ADCs lack the resources and expertise to effectively discharge their responsibilities.
Comparison: Fifth vs. Sixth Schedule
| Feature | Fifth Schedule | Sixth Schedule |
|---|---|---|
| Geographic Scope | Andhra Pradesh, Telangana, Maharashtra, Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Odisha | Assam, Meghalaya, Tripura, Mizoram |
| Type of Governance | Advisory councils and Village Councils | Autonomous District Councils |
| Level of Autonomy | Lower, primarily advisory | Higher, with legislative and administrative powers |
| State Control | Significant | Significant, but ADCs have more defined powers |
Recent Developments and Challenges
The NITI Aayog's report on ‘Revisiting the Sixth Schedule’ (2020) has highlighted the need for reforms to enhance the effectiveness of ADCs. Issues like overlapping jurisdictions, inadequate funding, and lack of capacity building remain significant challenges. The demand for a separate state of Bodoland in Assam, with an autonomous council enjoying greater powers, exemplifies the ongoing struggle for tribal self-determination.
Conclusion
The Fifth and Sixth Schedules represent a significant attempt by the Indian Constitution to address the unique needs of Scheduled Tribes. While they have provided a framework for tribal self-governance, their effectiveness remains limited by factors like state control, inadequate funding, and political interference. The need for continuous review, greater decentralization, and enhanced tribal participation in decision-making processes is paramount. Future reforms should prioritize empowering ADCs and strengthening TACs to ensure that these schedules truly fulfill their intended purpose of safeguarding tribal rights and promoting inclusive development.
Answer Length
This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.