UPSC MainsPOLITICAL-SCIENCE-INTERANATIONAL-RELATIONS-PAPER-II201610 Marks150 Words
हिंदी में पढ़ें
Q16.

Comment on India's contribution to Non-Alignment Movement and its contemporary relevance.

How to Approach

This question requires a nuanced understanding of India’s historical role in the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) and its continuing relevance in the current geopolitical landscape. The answer should begin by defining NAM and India’s foundational principles in joining it. It should then detail India’s contributions – leadership, advocacy, and practical support. Finally, it must assess NAM’s contemporary relevance, acknowledging its limitations while highlighting its continued importance for countries seeking an independent foreign policy. A balanced approach, acknowledging both successes and failures, is crucial.

Model Answer

0 min read

Introduction

The Non-Aligned Movement (NAM), formally established in Belgrade in 1961, emerged during the Cold War as a forum for countries that did not align themselves with or against either the United States or the Soviet Union. India, under the leadership of Jawaharlal Nehru, was a founding member and a key architect of NAM. Rooted in the principles of anti-colonialism, anti-imperialism, and peaceful coexistence, NAM aimed to provide a platform for newly independent nations to pursue their own development paths and advocate for a more equitable international order. India’s commitment to these principles shaped its foreign policy for decades, and its contributions to NAM were substantial.

India’s Contribution to the Non-Aligned Movement

India’s contribution to NAM extended beyond mere membership; it actively shaped the movement’s agenda and provided significant leadership.

  • Foundational Role & Leadership: Jawaharlal Nehru was a central figure in conceptualizing and establishing NAM. India hosted the New Delhi Summit in 1967, solidifying its leadership position. Subsequent Indian Prime Ministers continued to actively participate in NAM summits and initiatives.
  • Advocacy for Disarmament: India consistently advocated for nuclear disarmament and a world free of weapons of mass destruction within the NAM framework. This stance was particularly prominent during the Cold War and continues to be relevant today.
  • South-South Cooperation: India championed South-South cooperation, promoting economic and technical assistance among developing countries. The Indian Technical and Economic Cooperation (ITEC) program, launched in 1964, became a key instrument for providing capacity building and training to partner countries in the South.
  • Anti-Colonialism & Anti-Apartheid: India played a crucial role in mobilizing international opinion against colonialism and apartheid. It provided material and diplomatic support to liberation movements in Africa and other parts of the world.
  • Promoting a Multipolar World: India consistently advocated for a multipolar world order, resisting the dominance of any single power. This position resonated with many NAM members and helped shape the movement’s overall agenda.

Contemporary Relevance of NAM

While the Cold War context that birthed NAM has disappeared, the movement continues to hold relevance in the 21st century, albeit in a modified form.

  • Voice of the Global South: NAM remains a significant platform for developing countries to articulate their concerns and advocate for their interests on the global stage. Issues like climate change, sustainable development, and fair trade are central to NAM’s agenda.
  • Promoting Multilateralism: In an era of increasing unilateralism and great power competition, NAM continues to champion multilateralism and the strengthening of international institutions like the United Nations.
  • Addressing New Challenges: NAM is adapting to address new challenges such as terrorism, cyber security, and pandemics. It provides a forum for member states to share experiences and coordinate responses.
  • Economic Cooperation: NAM promotes economic cooperation among developing countries through initiatives like the NAM Fund for Science and Technology.
  • Limitations: NAM faces challenges such as internal divisions, lack of cohesion, and limited financial resources. The movement’s effectiveness is often hampered by differing national interests and priorities.

However, the relevance of NAM is debated. Some argue it has become largely symbolic, lacking the influence it once held. Others maintain that it remains a vital platform for countries seeking to navigate a complex and increasingly polarized world, offering an alternative to aligning with major powers.

Conclusion

India’s contribution to the Non-Aligned Movement was pivotal in shaping its early trajectory and establishing its core principles. While the context of NAM has evolved significantly since its inception, its fundamental ideals of independent foreign policy, South-South cooperation, and multilateralism remain relevant. NAM continues to provide a valuable platform for developing countries to voice their concerns and advocate for a more equitable global order, even as it navigates internal challenges and adapts to a changing world. India’s continued engagement with NAM, albeit with a pragmatic approach, is crucial for promoting its own interests and contributing to a more stable and just international system.

Answer Length

This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.

Additional Resources

Key Definitions

Non-Alignment
A foreign policy doctrine adopted by nations that do not formally align with or against any major power bloc. It emphasizes independence, neutrality, and peaceful coexistence.
South-South Cooperation
A framework for collaboration among developing countries, focusing on sharing knowledge, resources, and expertise to promote mutual development and address common challenges.

Key Statistics

As of 2023, NAM comprises 120 member states, representing nearly two-thirds of the world’s population.

Source: NAM Official Website (as of knowledge cutoff)

In 2022, trade among NAM member states accounted for approximately 15% of global trade.

Source: UNCTAD Handbook of Statistics (as of knowledge cutoff)

Examples

India’s stance on the Ukraine conflict

India’s refusal to explicitly condemn Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and its continued engagement with both sides demonstrates its adherence to the principles of non-alignment, prioritizing its own strategic interests and advocating for a peaceful resolution.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is NAM still relevant after the end of the Cold War?

While the original context of the Cold War is gone, NAM remains relevant as a platform for developing countries to address contemporary challenges like climate change, economic inequality, and great power competition, advocating for a more equitable global order.

Topics Covered

International RelationsIndian PoliticsForeign PolicyNAMSouth-South Cooperation