UPSC MainsANTHROPOLOGY-PAPER-II202510 Marks150 Words
हिंदी में पढ़ें
Q5.

Write short notes on the following in about 150 words each: (e) Characteristics and communication between Little and Great Traditions

How to Approach

The question asks for short notes on the characteristics and communication between Little and Great Traditions. The approach should involve defining both concepts as proposed by Robert Redfield and further elaborated by scholars like Milton Singer and McKim Marriott. It is crucial to highlight their distinct features and then delve into the dynamic processes of interaction, such as universalization and parochialization, providing relevant examples from the Indian context. A balanced structure with clear headings will ensure comprehensive coverage within the word limit.

Model Answer

0 min read

Introduction

The concepts of "Little Tradition" and "Great Tradition" were initially proposed by anthropologist Robert Redfield in his studies of civilizations, particularly in Mexico, and later extensively applied and refined by scholars like Milton Singer and McKim Marriott in the Indian context. These concepts provide a valuable framework for understanding the complex interplay of cultural practices within a society, especially in peasant societies with long histories. They recognize that a civilization is not a homogenous entity but a dynamic system where different cultural streams coexist and interact, shaping each other continuously.

Characteristics of Little and Great Traditions

The two traditions are distinguished by their scope, carriers, and forms of transmission:
  • Little Tradition:
    • Localized and Oral: Primarily found in rural, less literate settings; transmitted orally through folklore, myths, local rituals, and customs.
    • Diverse and Heterogeneous: Varies significantly from one local community to another, reflecting specific ecological, social, and economic conditions.
    • Folk Culture: Encompasses everyday practices, local deities, folk artists, medicine men, and community-level moral codes.
    • Informal and Uncodified: Often unwritten, spontaneous, and adapted to immediate local needs.
  • Great Tradition:
    • Formal and Textual: Associated with the educated elite, urban centers, and formal institutions; preserved in written texts like scriptures, epics, and classical literature.
    • Standardized and Homogeneous: Tends to be pan-regional or pan-national, aiming for a broader, more uniform cultural consciousness.
    • Elite Culture: Carried by priests, theologians, scholars, and other cultural specialists; emphasizes formal religion, philosophy, and high art.
    • Codified and Institutionalized: Governed by established norms, institutions, and often state or religious authority.

Communication between Little and Great Traditions

The interaction between these two traditions is dynamic and reciprocal, leading to cultural change and synthesis. McKim Marriott and Milton Singer further elaborated on these processes in India:
  • Universalization: This is the process where cultural elements from the Little Tradition are absorbed, refined, and formalized into the Great Tradition.
    • Example: Local folk deities or practices might gain wider acceptance and become incorporated into the pantheon or rituals of a classical religion, often undergoing systematization and textual validation.
  • Parochialization: This refers to the downward movement of cultural traits from the Great Tradition, which are then localized, reinterpreted, and adapted to suit the specific contexts and needs of the Little Tradition.
    • Example: Complex philosophical concepts or classical epics like the Ramayana are often retold in local dialects, through folk theatre (like Ramlila), or incorporated into regional festivals, making them accessible and relevant to village communities.
  • Cultural Specialists: Mediators like priests, bards, teachers, and religious leaders play a crucial role in facilitating this communication, interpreting and transmitting elements between the two traditions.
  • Constant Interaction: The relationship is not static but a continuous flow, ensuring cultural continuity and allowing for innovation and adaptation within a civilization. Both traditions are interdependent, with local variations influencing broader cultural currents and vice versa.

Conclusion

The concepts of Little and Great Traditions, developed by Robert Redfield and refined by others, offer a fundamental understanding of how complex civilizations maintain unity amidst diversity. They illustrate that culture is a living, evolving entity, shaped by a constant, reciprocal exchange between its local, informal expressions and its formalized, widespread manifestations. This dynamic interaction, characterized by processes like universalization and parochialization, ensures that cultural systems remain vibrant, adaptable, and reflective of both local specificities and overarching civilizational ethos.

Answer Length

This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.

Additional Resources

Key Definitions

Little Tradition
The unwritten, localized, and often orally transmitted customs, beliefs, and practices of rural communities, folk religions, and everyday life, typically found in less literate societies.
Great Tradition
The formalized, codified, and often textual traditions of the elite, urban centers, and religious institutions, typically associated with classical texts, formalized rituals, and high art.

Key Statistics

A study by McKim Marriott in a North Indian village observed that 15 out of 19 village festivals celebrated were sanctioned by at least one Sanskrit text, indicating significant overlap and interaction between the local (Little) and textual (Great) traditions in religious practices.

Source: McKim Marriott (1955), "Little Communities in an Indigenous Civilization"

Examples

Sanskritic Hinduism

In India, the 'Great Tradition' is largely carried by Sanskrit, embodying pan-Indian, prestigious, and ancient textual authorities like the Vedas, Puranas, and epics such as the Ramayana and Mahabharata. Conversely, local village deities, specific regional festivals, and folk tales constitute the 'Little Tradition', which often reinterpret or localise elements of the Great Tradition.

Ramlila as Parochialization

The classical Sanskrit epic 'Ramayana' (Great Tradition) is performed as 'Ramlila' in countless villages across India during Dussehra. This folk theatrical representation, with its local dialects, musical forms, and community participation, is a prime example of parochialization, making the grand narrative accessible to the masses.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who originally proposed the concepts of Little and Great Traditions?

The concepts were originally proposed by American anthropologist Robert Redfield in his studies of peasant societies and civilizations, particularly in Mexico. They were later applied and elaborated in the Indian context by scholars like Milton Singer and McKim Marriott.

What is the main difference between universalization and parochialization?

Universalization is the upward process where elements of the Little Tradition become part of the Great Tradition, gaining wider recognition and formalization. Parochialization is the downward process where elements of the Great Tradition are adapted and localized to suit the contexts of the Little Tradition.

Topics Covered

AnthropologySociologyCultural AnthropologyFolk CultureClassical CultureSocial ChangeTradition